Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: FRANCHISE OFFSHORE MANAGEMENT INC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of FRANCHISE OFFSHORE MANAGEMENT INC in CARR 2 KM 111.11 # 3945, ISABELA, PR 00662 (NAICS 441110). OSHA activity number 308165190.

Watch Franchise Offshore Management INC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Franchise Offshore Management INC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
CARR 2 KM 111.11 # 3945
City
ISABELA
State
PR
ZIP
00662
Mailing
PMB 487 SUITE 140 AVE RAFAEL CORDERO # 200, CAGUAS, PR 00725
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
N
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
441110
SIC code (legacy)
5511
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

6A0001

Serious Gravity 02 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 24, 2007
Abate by
Jun 16, 2007
Penalty
Initial $300 · Current $300
7.Establecer un record de reparaciones por escrito.
8.Disponibilidad de los manuales del manufacturero."d
Section 6(a) of the Puerto Rico Occupational Safety and Health Act: The
employer did not
furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards that
were causing or likely to cause death or physical harm to employees in
that employees were
exposed to:
Seccion 6(a) de la Ley de Seguridad y Salud en el Trabajo de Puerto Rico:
El patrono no
proveyo empleo y un sitio de empleo libre de riesgos reconocidos que esten
causando o que
puedan causar muerte o dano fisico a los empleados, por cuanto empleados
estaban expuestos
a:
a)At Franchise Offshore Management Inc. workshop - The following hydraulic
systems Rotary Lift Model, SPOA 9N400, Serial No. ARZ02K028; Rotary Lift
Model, SPOA 9N400, Serial No. ARZ0210892; Rotary Lift Model SPOA 9N400,
Serial No. ARZ02H0656, which one were used by the employees to lift the
vehicule and repair then, were not comply with the requirements establish
in
the
ANSI/ALI-2000:
1.Leak of operator training about the systems use and operation.
2.A daily inspection were not perform about the following points:
a.Accessibility of operating procedures and safety tips.
b.Accessibility of the warning labels.
c.Accessibility of the rated load capacity of the lift.
d.Verify the proper operation of the lifts controls and restraints.
e.Verify deformation or excessive wear of other components such as
electrical wires, drive chains, cables or screw.
f.Verify damage or excessive wear on any of the lift contact points
wich engage the vehicle during lifts.
g.Verify evidence of hydraulic or pneumatic leaks.
3.The employer did not establish a procedure of periodics inspeccion
according the manufacturer manual.
4.A inspection record and findings with all points recomended by the
manufacturer and repairs perform did not establish.
5.A qualified inspection according the manufacturer recomendations or at
least annually did not perform.
6.A maintenance periodic preventive written record with the manufacturer
recomendations that included the repairs and adjustments were not
establish.
7.A repairs written record with the manufacturer recomendations were not
establish.
8.The manufacturer manuals were not accesible.
Hazard:  malfunction of the hydraulics systems and mechanicals fails.
Among other correction methods some feasible correction method and
acceptable
are the followings:
1.Trained the employees about the use and operation of the systems.
2.Perform daily inspections about the followings points:
a.Accessibility of the operation procedure and general information.
b.Accessibility and readability of the safety warning labels.
c.Readability of the rated load capacity of the lift.
d.Verify the proper operation of the lifts controls and restaints.
e.Verify the deformation or excessive wear of the other components
such as electrical wires, drive chains, cables or screws.
f.Verify the evidence of damage or excessive wear on any of the lift
contact points which engage the vehicle during lifting.
g.Verify evidence of hydraulic or pneumatic leaks.
h.Verify evidence of cracks or loose concrete around floor anchor
bolts.
3.Establish a periodic inspection procedure in accordance with the
recommendations of the manufacturer.
4.Establish a inspection record and findings with all points recommended by
the manufacturer and repairs perform.
5.Perform a qualified inspection according the manufacturer recomendations
or at least annually.6.Establish a maintenance periodic preventive written
record with the
manufacturer recommendations that included the repairs and adjustments.
7.Establish a repairs written record with the manufacturer recommendations.
8.Accessibility of the manufacturer manuals.
a)En el taller de Franchise Offshore Management Inc. - Los siguientes
sistemas
hidraulicos modelo Rotary Lift Model, SPOA 9N400, Serial No. ARZ02K028;
Rotary Lift Model, SPOA 9N400, Serial No. ARZ0210892; Rotary Lift Model
SPOA 9N400, Serial No. ARZ02H0656, eran utilizados por los empleados para
levantar y reparar los autos, no cumplian con los siguientes requisitos
establecidos
en el ANSI/ALI-2000:
1.Falta de adiestramiento del operador en el uso y operacion de los
sistemas.
2.No se realizaron inspecciones diarias sobre los siguientes puntos:
a.Acceso a los procedimientos de operacion e informacion general
de seguridad.
b.Acceso a las etiquetas de aviso.
c.Legibilidad de la capacidad de carga del pino.
d.Verificar la operacion apropiada de los controles del pino y
restricciones.
e.Verificar evidencia de deformacion o desgaste excesivo de
componentes como lo son la cableria electrica, cadenas, cadenas,
cables y/o tornillos.
f.Verificar evidencia de dano o desgaste excesivo de cualquier punto
de contacto que pudiera estar ocupado mientras un vehiculo es
levantado.
g.Verificar evidencia de liqueos hidraulicos o neumaticos.
h.Verificar evidencia de grietas en el concreto alrededor de los
puntos de anclaje.
3.El patrono no establecio un procedimiento de inspecciones periodicas
segun el manual del manufacturero.
4.No existia un record de inspeccion con las observaciones y hallazgos de
todos los puntos de inspeccion recomendados por el manufacturero y las
reparaciones realizadas.
5.No se realizaron inspecciones cualificadas segun las recomendaciones del
manufacturero o por lo menos 1 vez al ano.
6.No se establecio un record de mantenimiento periodico preventivo por
escrito de acuerdo con las recomendaciones de manufacturero  que
incluyera las partes reparadas y ajustadas.
7. No se establecio un record de reparaciones por escrito de acuerdo con
las
recomendaciones del manufacturero.
8.Los manuales de los manufactureros no estaban disponibles.
Riesgo:  mal funcionamiento de los sistemas hidraulicos y fallas mecanicas.
Entre otros medios de correccion varios metodos de correccion factible y
aceptable se encuentran los siguientes:
1.Adiestrar a los operadores en el uso y operacion de los sistemas.
2.Realizar inspecciones diarias sobre los siguientes puntos:
a.Que los procedimientos de operacion e informacion general de
seguridad este accesible.
b.Que las etiquetas de aviso esten accesibles y legibles.
c.Que la capacidad de carga del pino este legible.
d.Verificar la operacion apropiada de los controles del pino y
restricciones.
e.Verificar la evidencia de deformacion o desgaste excesivo de otros
componentes como los son la cableria electrica, cadenas, cables
y/o tornillos.
f.Verificar la evidencia de dano o desgaste excesivo de cualquier
pinto de contacto que pueda estar ocupado mientras el vehiculo es
levantado.
g.Verificar la evidencia de liqueos hidraulicos y neumaticos.
h.Verificar que no haya grietas en el concreto alrededor de os puntos
de anclaje.
3.Establecer un procedimiento de inspecciones periodicas preventivos segun
el manual del manufacturero.
4.Establecer un record de inspeccion con todas las observaciones y
hallazgos
de todos los puntos de inspeccion recomendados por el manufacturero y
las reparaciones realizadas.
5.Realizar una inspeccion cualificada, segun las recomendaciones del
manufacturero o por lo menos una vez al ano.
6.Establecer un record de mantenimiento periodico preventivo por escrito
de acuerdo con las recomendaciones del manufacturero.

1910.37 Q01

Serious Gravity 02 2 instances 1 exposed
Issued
May 24, 2007
Abate by
May 30, 2007
Penalty
Initial $300 · Current $300

1910.132 D01

Serious Gravity 01 1 instance
Issued
May 24, 2007
Abate by
Jun 6, 2007
Penalty
Initial $225 · Current $225

1910.132 F01

Serious Gravity 01 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 24, 2007
Abate by
Jun 6, 2007
Penalty
Initial $225 · Current $225

1910.133 A01

Serious Gravity 01 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 24, 2007
Abate by
Jun 6, 2007
Penalty
Initial $225 · Current $225

1910.141 A05

Serious Gravity 01 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 24, 2007
Abate by
May 30, 2007
Penalty
Initial $225 · Current $225

1910.141 D02 III

Serious Gravity 02 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 24, 2007
Abate by
May 30, 2007
Penalty
Initial $300 · Current $300

1910.157 D01

Serious Gravity 02 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 24, 2007
Abate by
May 30, 2007
Penalty
Initial $300 · Current $300

1700IV0A01

Other-than-serious Gravity 01 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 24, 2007
Abate by
Jun 16, 2007
Penalty
Initial $75 · Current $75

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 308165190.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.