HARTFORD, CT —
OSHA Inspection: ABOVE & BEYOND CLEANING SYSTEMS, INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of ABOVE & BEYOND CLEANING SYSTEMS, INC. in 750 MAIN STREET, HARTFORD, CT 06103 (NAICS 561720). OSHA activity number 308279918.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ABOVE & BEYOND CLEANING SYSTEMS, INC.
- Site address
- 750 MAIN STREET
- City
- HARTFORD
- State
- CT
- ZIP
- 06103
- Mailing
- 2269 S. UNIVERSITY DRIVE, SUITE 390, DAVIE, FL 33328
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 561720
- SIC code (legacy)
- 7349
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
2 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Aug 1, 2006
- Abate by
- Aug 7, 2006
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to serious fall hazards: Boxer Building, 750 Main Street, Hartford, CT: Employees of Above & Beyond Window Washers performing window washing activities on the exterior of the 17 story building were using rope descent systems consisting of a Miller chair and a Sky Genie chair, a Petzel mountain climbing belt and a Singing Rock rock climbing belt with descent device racks. 1. The support lines and the safety lines for the rope descent systems were tied to free standing counterweights on the roof. The counterweights did not have enough weight to safety support the employees. 2. The support lines and safety lines were tied together to the same counterweights on the roof. The tiebacks for the support lines and the tie backs for the safety lines were attached to the same roof railings. Tiebacks were not perpendicular to the wall of the building. A tieback on the west wall had excessive slack in the rope between the counterweight and the tieback attaching point. 3. Round counterweights were attached to the rigging at the roof using short lengths of violet color polypropylene rope that did not have adequate strength. A carabiner used to connect the counterweights was not locked. 4. Where support lines and safety lines for the rope descent systems went over the edge of the parapet walls and went over the edges of the roof, the cloth rags used to protect the lines from abrasion were not adequate. 5. On the west wall two rope sections were tied together to make one of the safety lines long enough to reach the ground. This required disconnecting the rope grab as the worker descended past the knot. In addition, the knot significantly reduced the impact strength of the rope. 6. One black safety line being used had a badly frayed section that was nicked. The safety line being used on the west wall had excessive wear. The webbing material for both the Sky Genie and the Miller chair had excessive wear. 7. The two employees doing window washing were wearing rock climbing harnesses. One harness was a Singing Rock harness. The other harness was a Pezel harness. Neither harness was rated as a fall arrest harness. Lanyards were made out of nylon webbing material that did not have adequate strength or shock absorbing characteristics. Rope grabs being used were designed for ascending fixed ropes and did not have adequate strength. A carabiner connector being used was marked "For Climbing and Mountaineering Use Only." Among other methods the following are feasible and acceptable means of abating the hazards: 1. Install roof support equipment and suspension devices for rope descent systems that meet the design and installation requirements of American National Standards Institute standard ANSI/IWCA I-14.1 "Window Cleaning Safety". Ensure that all components of the system have an adequate safety factor. Eliminate the use of free standing counterweights. 2. Ensure that fall arrest systems including safety lines are independent of support systems. Ensure that tiebacks are attached to an anchorage in line (within 15 degrees of perpendicular) with the area being accessed. Ensure that anchorage points have been certified that they are capable of sustaining a 5000 pound minimum load or a minimum 4 to 1 safety factor whichever is larger. Ensure that tiebacks have a minimum amount of slack. 3. Eliminate the use of polypropylene rope. Ensure that all carabiners are locked before use. 4. Provide better protection for all ropes to protect them from contact with surfaces that may abrade, sever, weaken or damage them. 5. Use safety lines that are not spliced or knotted to ensure that the workers are connected to the fall arrest system at all times when suspended and to ensure that the strength of the rope is not compromised. 6. Develop and implement a comprehensive maintenance and inspection program to cover window washing equipment including rope descent systems and safety devices. Conduct a thorough inspection of all lines and equipment before each use. Immediately remove from service those components that have defects. Permanently mark all ropes with the date of manufacture and the date they were placed in service. Remove ropes from service if they have been in use over 2 years or if they are more than three years from the date of manufacture. 7. Ensure that employees who are using rope descent systems wear full body harnesses, use lanyards, and use rope grabs that meet the requirements of the American National Standards Institute standard ANSI Z359.1 "Safety Requirements for Personal Fall Arrest Systems." Do not use ascenders in lieu of fall protection rope grabs. Ensure that all carabineers and other hardware being used meet the requirements of ANSI Z359.1 and contain the specific marking requirements called for in the ANSI standard.
1910.23 C01
- Issued
- Aug 1, 2006
- Abate by
- Aug 7, 2006
- Penalty
- Initial $2,800 · Current $2,800
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 561720)
More inspections in CT
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 308279918.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.