Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,191,473Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-28 Last loaded 2026-07-31

OSHA Inspection: BRIDGE DISPOSAL

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of BRIDGE DISPOSAL in 22 OAKLAND CT., OLD BRIDGE, NJ 08857 (NAICS 541614). OSHA activity number 308288133.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Bridge Disposal — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Bridge Disposal is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
BRIDGE DISPOSAL
Site address
22 OAKLAND CT.
City
OLD BRIDGE
State
NJ
ZIP
08857
Mailing
PO BOX 373, MATAWAN, NJ 07747
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
N
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
541614
SIC code (legacy)
4731
Employees
25
Ownership type
A

3 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 05 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 15, 2005
Abate by
Apr 20, 2005
Penalty
Initial $525 · Current $525
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not
furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards that
were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees in that employees
were exposed to a crushing hazard:  Employees working as refuse collectors
on the rear loading
waste collection vehicles were exposed to the hazard of being struck by
vehicular traffic and
were not wearing reflective or high visibility vests or equivalent
personal protective equipment.
Violation observed on or about 1/25/05
ONE MEANS OF FEASIBLE ABATEMENT WOULD BE TO REQUIRE EMPLOYEES TO
WEAR REFLECTIVE OR HIGH VISIBILITY VESTS.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 15, 2005
Abate by
May 11, 2005
Penalty
Initial $1,500 · Current $1,500
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not
furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards that
were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees in that employees
were exposed to a crushing hazard:The refuse truck being operated was
known to have
mechanical problems before being placed in service on January 19, 2005.
Violation observed on or about 1/25/05.
AMONG OTHER METHODS, ONE FEASIBLE AND ACCEPTABLE ABATEMENT
METHOD TO CORRECT THIS HAZARD IS to repair and/or replace the solenoid
speed up
in accordance with ANSI Z245.1 6.1(d) which states repairing, prior to
placing equipment into
service, any mechanical malfunction or breakdown that affects the safe
operation of the
equipment.

1904.29 A

Other-than-serious Gravity 00 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Apr 15, 2005
Abate by
May 11, 2005

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 308288133.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.