HOUSTON, TX —
OSHA Inspection: RST MANUFACTURING
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of RST MANUFACTURING in 8516 HWY 6 S HOUSTON, HOUSTON, TX 77083 (NAICS 332312). OSHA activity number 308321116.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- RST MANUFACTURING
- Site address
- 8516 HWY 6 S HOUSTON
- City
- HOUSTON
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 77083
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332312
- SIC code (legacy)
- 3449
- Employees
- 25
- Ownership type
- A
- Industry flags
- Manufacturing safety.
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Nov 1, 2006
- Abate by
- Dec 4, 2006
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $1,500
General-duty citation text
hazards are to: (1) Follow the directions in Monorail Systems and Underhung Cranes of ANSI B30.11- 1973, Paragraph 11.2.1.3, Periodic Inspection (a through i) (PG 16). 2. Follow the directions in Monorail Systems and Underhung Cranes of ANSI B30.11- 1973, Paragraph 11.2.1.2, Frequent Inspection (a through h) (PG 16) 3. Follow the directions in Monorail Systems and Underhung Cranes of ANSI B30.11- 1973, Paragraph 11.2.3.1 A, Preventative Maintenance (PG 17). 4. Follow the direction in Monorail Systems and Underhung Cranes of and ANSI B30.11-1973, Paragraph 11.2.1.5, Inspection Records (PG 17) These methods are published by The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) to include manufactures recommendation. DISCLAIMERS: 1. You are not limited to the abatement methods suggested above. 2. The methods explained are general and may not be effective in all cases. 3. The employer is responsible for selecting and carrying out an appropriate method of abatement.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Nov 1, 2006
- Abate by
- Dec 4, 2006
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $1,500
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a) (1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: the hazard of being struck by or crushed when attempting to use a underhung crane to lift metal tubing. On or about 15 May 2006 an employees was using a monorail system and underhung crane to move a load. The employee did not ensure hat there was no sudden acceleration deceleration of the moving load and that the load did not contact any obstruction. The load oscillated, fell off of the magnet, hit a table and fell on the employee's foot. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement methods to correct this hazard is to (1) follow the direction in Monorail Systems and Underhung Cranes of ANSI B30.11-1973, Paragraph 11-3.2.1, Moving the Load, C 1(no sudden acceleration or deceleration of the load), C 2 (Loads does not contact any obstruction, f (operator should not carry load over people) PG 21, Published by The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) to include manufactures recommendation. DISCLAIMERS: 1. You are not limited to the abatement methods suggested above. 2. The methods explained are general and may not be effective in all cases. 3. The employer is responsible for selecting and carrying out an appropriate method of abatement. a) At 8516 Hwy 6 South Houston, TX where the employee did not ensure that there was no sudden acceleration deceleration of the moving load and that the load did not contact any obstruction. The load oscillated, fell off of the magnet, hit a table and fell on the employee's foot.
1910.184 D
- Issued
- Nov 1, 2006
- Abate by
- Dec 4, 2006
- Penalty
- Initial $600 · Current $600
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a) (1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: the hazard of being struck by or crushed when attempting to use a underhung crane to lift metal tubing. On or about 15 May 2006 an employees was using a monorail system and underhung crane to move a load. The employee did not ensure hat there was no sudden acceleration deceleration of the moving load and that the load did not contact any obstruction. The load oscillated, fell off of the magnet, hit a table and fell on the employee's foot. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement methods to correct this hazard is to (1) follow the direction in Monorail Systems and Underhung Cranes of ANSI B30.11-1973, Paragraph 11-3.2.1, Moving the Load, C 1(no sudden acceleration or deceleration of the load), C 2 (Loads does not contact any obstruction, f (operator should not carry load over people) PG 21, Published by The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) to include manufactures recommendation. DISCLAIMERS: 1. You are not limited to the abatement methods suggested above. 2. The methods explained are general and may not be effective in all cases. 3. The employer is responsible for selecting and carrying out an appropriate method of abatement. ***Certification AND Documentation of Abatement Required*** a) At 8516 Hwy 6 South Houston, TX where the employee did not ensure that there was no sudden acceleration deceleration of the moving load and that the load did not contact any obstruction. The load oscillated, fell off of the magnet, hit a table and fell on the employee's foot.
1910.184 I03 II
- Issued
- Nov 1, 2006
- Abate by
- Dec 4, 2006
- Penalty
- Initial $600 · Current $600
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332312)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 308321116.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.