CASCADE, ID —
OSHA Inspection: DATUM CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC.
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of DATUM CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC. in 109 WEST PINE, CASCADE, ID 83611 (NAICS 236220). OSHA activity number 308341981.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- DATUM CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT, INC.
- Site address
- 109 WEST PINE
- City
- CASCADE
- State
- ID
- ZIP
- 83611
- Mailing
- 12554 W. BRIDGER STREET, BOISE, ID 83713
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 236220
- SIC code (legacy)
- 1542
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Nov 7, 2005
- Abate by
- Nov 10, 2005
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $900 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety & Health Act of 1970:The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to structural collapse: a)South exterior wall of the Sanctuary - Cascade Community Church - 109 West Pine, Cascade, ID; On or about 10/26/05 and at times prior thereto, as the controlling employer, it was not determined/ensured that a load-bearing exterior wall was adequately constructed and laterally supported prior to placing roof trusses onto the wall, thereby exposing employees working on/around/under the wall and/or trusses to the hazard of being struck by the collapsing structure. Note: Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard would be following the temporary bracing requirements for roof truss installation per the Truss Manufacturer and/or Wood Truss Council of America's "Building Component Safety Information" Bulletin BCSI 1-03. b)Sanctuary area - Cascade Community Church - 109 West Pine, Cascade, ID; On or about 10/26/05 and at times prior thereto, as the controlling employer, it was not determined/ensured that roof trusses were laterally supported with diagonal bracing as they were installed, thereby exposing employees working on/around/under the wall and/or trusses to the hazard of being struck by the collapsing structure. Note: Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard would be following the temporary bracing requirements for roof truss installation per the Truss Manufacturer and/or Wood Truss Council of America's "Building Component Safety Information" Bulletin BCSI 1-03.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $900.00
- — Z (S) $1500.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Nov 7, 2005
- Abate by
- Nov 10, 2005
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety & Health Act of 1970:The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to structural collapse: a)South side staging area and Sanctuary area - Cascade Community Church - 109 West Pine, Cascade, ID; On or about 10/26/05 and at times prior thereto, as the controlling employer, it was not ensured that a spreader bar or "stiffback" was utilized for hoisting/placing roof trusses with a span greater than 30 feet, thereby exposing employees working on/around/under the trusses and/or parts of the structure to the hazard of being struck by the collapsing truss or structural collapse. Note: Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard would be following the hoisting requirements for roof trusses with a span greater than 30 feet per the Truss Manufacturer and/or Wood Truss Council of America's "Building Component Safety Information" Bulletin BCSI 1-03.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1926.501 B01
- Issued
- Nov 7, 2005
- Abate by
- Nov 10, 2005
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $900 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $900.00
- — Z (S) $1500.00
1926.550 A09
- Issued
- Nov 7, 2005
- Abate by
- Nov 10, 2005
Recent events (2)
- — I (O)
- — Z (O)
More inspections at Datum Construction Management, INC.
View Datum Construction Management, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 236220)
More inspections in ID
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 308341981.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.