Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: WILLIAMS METAL FINISHING, INCORPORATED

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of WILLIAMS METAL FINISHING, INCORPORATED in 870 COMMERCE STREET, SINKING SPRING, PA 19608 (NAICS 332813). OSHA activity number 308472075.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Williams Metal Finishing, Incorporated — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Williams Metal Finishing, Incorporated is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
870 COMMERCE STREET
City
SINKING SPRING
State
PA
ZIP
19608
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
N
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
332813
SIC code (legacy)
3471
Employees
74
Ownership type
A
Industry flags
Manufacturing safety.

5 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 02 8 instances 50 exposed
Issued
Dec 9, 2005
Abate by
Jan 1, 2007
Penalty
Initial $700 · Current $350 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not furnish employment
and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that
were causing or likely to cause
death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed
to severe burn injuries from a
potential dust explosion hazard that could have resulted from, or been
exacerbated by the (a) failure to locate
dust collectors that collect combustible/explosive dust outside of the
building; (b) failure to install abort
dampers on return air ductwork of dust collectors to protect downstream
processes; (c) failure to install
backdraft dampers on dust collectors to protect upstream processes; (d)
failure to install deflagration vents on
dust collectors; (e) failure to install deflagration vents on Harper
Booths; (f) failure to remove excess dust by
vacuuming prior to utilization of compressed air for blowing down
equipment:
(a)Harper Polishing Department - The Torit HPH 54 Dust Collector which
collects dust that was
determined to be explosive from the Harper Booths 7 through 12 was located
inside the
buiding, on or about October 25, 2005.
(b)Robot Polishing - The Torit HPH 96 Dust Collector which collects dust
determined to be
explosive from the Robot Stations D through J was set up to recirculate
filtered air back into
the building without utilizing any sort of isolation device such as abort
dampers, on or about
October 25, 2005.
(c)Robot Polishing, Hand Polishing,  and Harper Polishing - The Torit HPH
96 Dust Collector
which collects dust determined to be explosive from Robot Stations D
through J, the Torit
HPH 54 Dustcollector which collects dust determined to be explosive from
Robot Stations A
through C, the Torit Dust Collector which collects dust from the Hand
Polishing Stations, the
Torit Cyclone which collects dust determined to be explosive from Harper
Booths 4 through 6,
and the Torit Cyclone which collects dust from the Harper Booths 1 through
3 were not
isolated from upstream operations by the use of back draft dampers or
other
similar devices,
on or about October 25,2005.
(d)Harper Polishing Department - The Torit HPH 54 and the Torit Cyclones
which collect dust
determined to be explosive from the Harper Booths 1 through 12 were not
equipped with
deflagration vents which minimize the forces and pressures developed in
the event of an
explosion, on or about October 25, 2005.
(e)Harper Polishing Department - The Harper Booths which contained
accumulations of
combustible dust on horizontal surface areas sufficient to create a fire
or explosion hazard,
were not equipped with deflagration vents to minimize forces and pressures
developed in the
event of an explosion, on or about October 25, 2005.
(f)Harper Polishing Department - The Harper Booths which contain
accumulations of combustible
dust were not vacuumed to reduce these dust accumulations prior to using
compressed air to
"blowdown" equipment, on or about October 25, 2005.
ABATEMENT NOTE:  Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable
abatement method to
correct these hazards includes following NFPA 654 (Standard for the
Prevention of Fire and Dust
Explosions from the Manufacturing, Processing, and Handling of Combustible
Particulate Solids)
and/or NFPA 484 (Standard for Combustible Metals, Metal Powders, and Metal
Dusts) including but
not limited to:
Relocate the Torit HPH 54 Dust Collector to outside of the building or
comply with the requirements
of the exceptions listed in Paragraph 3.13.1.1 of NFPA 654.
Cease recirculating filtered air from the Torit HPH 96 Dust Collector back
into the building unless the
provisions of Paragraph 3.1.3 (Isolation of Equipment) of NFPA 654 are met.
Isolate all dust collectors from upstream operations by installing
backdraft dampers or otherwise
meeting the provisions of Paragraph 3.1.3 of NFPA 654.
Provide deflagration venting for all dust collectors that currently are
not equipped with such devices or
otherwise comply with the provisions of Paragraph 3.1.1 of NFPA 654.
Provide deflagration venting for all Harper Booths in accordance with
Chapter 2 of NFPA 654.
Devise cleaning strategies for Harper Booths that minimize the use of
compressed air or otherwise
comply with the requirements of Paragraph 4.2.2 of NFPA 654.
VERIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (3)
  • — P (S) $350.00
  • — I (S) $350.00
  • — Z (S) $700.00

1910.22 A01

Serious Gravity 02 1 instance 30 exposed
Issued
Dec 9, 2005
Abate by
Jan 11, 2006
Penalty
Initial $700 · Current $350 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $350.00
  • — Z (S) $700.00

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 02 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Dec 9, 2005
Abate by
Jan 11, 2006
Penalty
Initial $700 · Current $350 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $350.00
  • — Z (S) $700.00

1910.157 G03

Serious Gravity 02 1 instance 25 exposed
Issued
Dec 9, 2005
Abate by
Jan 11, 2006
Penalty
Initial $700 · Current $350 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $350.00
  • — Z (S) $700.00

1910.307 B

Serious Gravity 02 2 instances 35 exposed
Issued
Dec 9, 2005
Abate by
Sep 1, 2006
Penalty
Initial $700 · Current $350 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $350.00
  • — Z (S) $700.00

View Williams Metal Finishing, Incorporated's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 308472075.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.