SINKING SPRING, PA —
OSHA Inspection: WILLIAMS METAL FINISHING, INCORPORATED
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of WILLIAMS METAL FINISHING, INCORPORATED in 870 COMMERCE STREET, SINKING SPRING, PA 19608 (NAICS 332813). OSHA activity number 308472075.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- WILLIAMS METAL FINISHING, INCORPORATED
- Site address
- 870 COMMERCE STREET
- City
- SINKING SPRING
- State
- PA
- ZIP
- 19608
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332813
- SIC code (legacy)
- 3471
- Employees
- 74
- Ownership type
- A
- Industry flags
- Manufacturing safety.
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Dec 9, 2005
- Abate by
- Jan 1, 2007
- Penalty
- Initial $700 · Current $350 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to severe burn injuries from a potential dust explosion hazard that could have resulted from, or been exacerbated by the (a) failure to locate dust collectors that collect combustible/explosive dust outside of the building; (b) failure to install abort dampers on return air ductwork of dust collectors to protect downstream processes; (c) failure to install backdraft dampers on dust collectors to protect upstream processes; (d) failure to install deflagration vents on dust collectors; (e) failure to install deflagration vents on Harper Booths; (f) failure to remove excess dust by vacuuming prior to utilization of compressed air for blowing down equipment: (a)Harper Polishing Department - The Torit HPH 54 Dust Collector which collects dust that was determined to be explosive from the Harper Booths 7 through 12 was located inside the buiding, on or about October 25, 2005. (b)Robot Polishing - The Torit HPH 96 Dust Collector which collects dust determined to be explosive from the Robot Stations D through J was set up to recirculate filtered air back into the building without utilizing any sort of isolation device such as abort dampers, on or about October 25, 2005. (c)Robot Polishing, Hand Polishing, and Harper Polishing - The Torit HPH 96 Dust Collector which collects dust determined to be explosive from Robot Stations D through J, the Torit HPH 54 Dustcollector which collects dust determined to be explosive from Robot Stations A through C, the Torit Dust Collector which collects dust from the Hand Polishing Stations, the Torit Cyclone which collects dust determined to be explosive from Harper Booths 4 through 6, and the Torit Cyclone which collects dust from the Harper Booths 1 through 3 were not isolated from upstream operations by the use of back draft dampers or other similar devices, on or about October 25,2005. (d)Harper Polishing Department - The Torit HPH 54 and the Torit Cyclones which collect dust determined to be explosive from the Harper Booths 1 through 12 were not equipped with deflagration vents which minimize the forces and pressures developed in the event of an explosion, on or about October 25, 2005. (e)Harper Polishing Department - The Harper Booths which contained accumulations of combustible dust on horizontal surface areas sufficient to create a fire or explosion hazard, were not equipped with deflagration vents to minimize forces and pressures developed in the event of an explosion, on or about October 25, 2005. (f)Harper Polishing Department - The Harper Booths which contain accumulations of combustible dust were not vacuumed to reduce these dust accumulations prior to using compressed air to "blowdown" equipment, on or about October 25, 2005. ABATEMENT NOTE: Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct these hazards includes following NFPA 654 (Standard for the Prevention of Fire and Dust Explosions from the Manufacturing, Processing, and Handling of Combustible Particulate Solids) and/or NFPA 484 (Standard for Combustible Metals, Metal Powders, and Metal Dusts) including but not limited to: Relocate the Torit HPH 54 Dust Collector to outside of the building or comply with the requirements of the exceptions listed in Paragraph 3.13.1.1 of NFPA 654. Cease recirculating filtered air from the Torit HPH 96 Dust Collector back into the building unless the provisions of Paragraph 3.1.3 (Isolation of Equipment) of NFPA 654 are met. Isolate all dust collectors from upstream operations by installing backdraft dampers or otherwise meeting the provisions of Paragraph 3.1.3 of NFPA 654. Provide deflagration venting for all dust collectors that currently are not equipped with such devices or otherwise comply with the provisions of Paragraph 3.1.1 of NFPA 654. Provide deflagration venting for all Harper Booths in accordance with Chapter 2 of NFPA 654. Devise cleaning strategies for Harper Booths that minimize the use of compressed air or otherwise comply with the requirements of Paragraph 4.2.2 of NFPA 654. VERIFICATION REQUIRED
Recent events (3)
- — P (S) $350.00
- — I (S) $350.00
- — Z (S) $700.00
1910.22 A01
- Issued
- Dec 9, 2005
- Abate by
- Jan 11, 2006
- Penalty
- Initial $700 · Current $350 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $350.00
- — Z (S) $700.00
1910.147 C04 I
- Issued
- Dec 9, 2005
- Abate by
- Jan 11, 2006
- Penalty
- Initial $700 · Current $350 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $350.00
- — Z (S) $700.00
1910.157 G03
- Issued
- Dec 9, 2005
- Abate by
- Jan 11, 2006
- Penalty
- Initial $700 · Current $350 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $350.00
- — Z (S) $700.00
1910.307 B
- Issued
- Dec 9, 2005
- Abate by
- Sep 1, 2006
- Penalty
- Initial $700 · Current $350 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $350.00
- — Z (S) $700.00
More inspections at Williams Metal Finishing, Incorporated
View Williams Metal Finishing, Incorporated's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332813)
More inspections in PA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 308472075.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.