Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,198,201Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-31 Last loaded 2026-09-03

OSHA Inspection: ED BENNER D/B/A BENNER BUILDERS

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ED BENNER D/B/A BENNER BUILDERS in HWY 96 AT LAKEVIEW RD, HAMILTON, IL 62341 (NAICS 236115). OSHA activity number 308566942.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch ED Benner D/B/A Benner Builders for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for ED Benner D/B/A Benner Builders is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
HWY 96 AT LAKEVIEW RD
City
HAMILTON
State
IL
ZIP
62341
Mailing
2200 JOHNSON STREET RD, KEOKUK, IA 52632
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (N)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
236115
SIC code (legacy)
1521
Employees
2
Ownership type
Private (A)

1 citation on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 01 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
May 26, 2005
Abate by
Jun 8, 2005
Penalty
Initial $450 · Current $450
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not
furnish to each of his employees employment and a place of employment
which were free
from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or
serious physical harm
to employees in that employees were exposed to:
On May 17, 2005 at a residential construction site located on State
Highway 96 at Lakeview
Road in Hamilton, Illinois, an employee was exposed to fall hazards while
working from a
platform resting on the forks of a rough terrain fork lift, because:
a)The platform was approximately 8.5 feet high, the platform was not
provided with
guard rails and the employee was not wearing a personal fall protection
system;
b)The platform was not secured to the rough terrain forklift;
c)The platform did not indicate the maximum work load, including personnel
and
equipment, or the weight of the empty platform;
d)The rough terrain forklift was moved with the workers on the elevated
platform;
e)The rough terrain forklift operator left the vehicle unattended and the
wheels were not
blocked while workers were on the elevated platform.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard
is to block the wheels of the forklift when it is unattended; lower
personnel platform and
have employees dismount prior to repositioning the forklift; and obtain
and use a platform in
accordance with ASME B56.6-2002, American National Safety Standard for
Rough Terrain
Forklift Trucks.

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 308566942.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.