FORT WORTH, TX —
OSHA Inspection: ELMER CADENA
Accident-driven inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an accident-driven safety inspection of ELMER CADENA in 9028 STEINER STREET, FORT WORTH, TX 76248 (NAICS 238910). OSHA activity number 308651173.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ELMER CADENA
- Site address
- 9028 STEINER STREET
- City
- FORT WORTH
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 76248
- Mailing
- 4950 NOLAN ST., FORT WORTH, TX 76119
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Accident-driven (A)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238910
- SIC code (legacy)
- 1794
- Employees
- 12
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Oct 16, 2006
- Abate by
- Oct 26, 2006
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees: On or about April 17 & 18, 2006 at the construction site of a single family dwelling in Fort Worth, TX, workers performing work activity outdoors were subjected to excessive levels of heat stress due to a combination of work activities and weather conditions. Exposure to heat stress may result in serious heat-induced illnesses which include: transient heat fatigue, heat rash, fainting, heat cramps, heat exhaustion, and heat stroke. Among other means, one feasible and acceptable method to correct this hazard is to develop and implement an effective heat stress program that includes, but is not limited to the following: 1.Providing adequate amounts of cool potable water and/or electrolyte replacements in the work area to ensure employees are recuperating lost fluids and/or minerals; 2.Establishing a work/rest regimen so that exposure time to high temperatures and/or the work rate is decreased and/or rest periods increased in length and frequency; 3.Establishing a training program to inform employees about the effects of heat stress and how to recognize, prevent, and treat heat-induced illnesses/symptoms; 4.Utilizing a screening program to identify health conditions aggravated by elevated environmental temperatures; 5.Implementing a heat acclimatization program for new employees or employees returning to work from absence; 6.Wearing light, loose-fitting, breathable (like cotton) clothing and/or utilizing cooling products, i.e., cooling vests, liners, neck shades, etc. to cool body temperature; 7.Providing a cooler area where heat-affected employees may recover when signs and symptoms of heat-related illnesses are recognized and/or reported; 8.Developing specific procedures to be followed for heat-related emergency situations; and 9.Establishing provisions that first aid be administered immediately to employees displaying symptoms of heat related illnesses.
Recent events (2)
- — J (S) $500.00
- — Z (S) $1500.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Oct 16, 2006
- Abate by
- Oct 20, 2006
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees. On or about April 26, 2006 at the construction site of a single family dwelling in Fort Worth, TX, employees operated and/or worked in close proximity to a CASE TF300 Trencher that was not adequately maintained exposing workers to hazards that included, but were not limited to: a)The hazard of being caught in the unguarded moving parts of the equipment, i.e., drive chain, cutting chain and/or the point of operation. b)The CASE TF300 trencher was not equipped with a seat and the seat interlock system which requires the operator to be seated when starting and operating this machine was not functional potentially exposing the user and/or nearby workers to a struck-by hazard of the equipment and/or its attachments. Among other means, some feasible and acceptable methods to correct these hazards are to install guards over exposed rotating parts, replace and/or repair the safety interlock system, and maintaining the equipment as detailed in the tractor's operators manual.
Recent events (2)
- — J (S) $500.00
- — Z (S) $1500.00
1926.20 B02
- Issued
- Oct 16, 2006
- Abate by
- Oct 20, 2006
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $500 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — J (S) $500.00
- — Z (S) $1500.00
1926.20 B04
- Issued
- Oct 16, 2006
- Abate by
- Oct 20, 2006
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $500 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — J (S) $500.00
- — Z (S) $1500.00
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238910)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 308651173.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.