MORGANTON, NC —
OSHA Inspection: SKELLY, INCORPORATED
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of SKELLY, INCORPORATED in 130 ROMARCO ROAD, MORGANTON, NC 28655 (NAICS 321912). OSHA activity number 308787241.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SKELLY, INCORPORATED
- Site address
- 130 ROMARCO ROAD
- City
- MORGANTON
- State
- NC
- ZIP
- 28655
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 321912
- SIC code (legacy)
- 2426
- Employees
- 12
- Ownership type
- A
- Industry flags
- Manufacturing safety.
Citations
16 citations on file for this inspection.
95012901
- Issued
- Sep 7, 2005
- Abate by
- Oct 25, 2005
- Penalty
- Initial $125 · Current $125
General-duty citation text
North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of North Carolina: The employer did not furnish to each of his employees conditions of employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees: a)Glue area -- the supporting structure used to support a 1/2 ton chain hoist, which was used to lift and support a 55 gallon barrel of glue, was not inspected and load tested to ensure the structure could support the load(s) applied when using the hoist. Reference:ANSI B30.16-2003, Section 16-1.3: Installation, Paragraph 16-1.3.2 Support: The supporting structure, including trolleys, monorail, or crane, shall be designed to withstand the loads and forces imposed by the hoist for the rated load. NOTE:Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method to correct this hazard is to have all supporting structures used with overhead hoists inspected and load tested to determine the load(s) can be sustained without damage.
95012901
- Issued
- Sep 7, 2005
- Abate by
- Oct 25, 2005
- Penalty
- Initial $125 · Current $125
General-duty citation text
North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of North Carolina: The employer did not furnish to each of his employees conditions of employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees: a)Glue area - the under-the-hook lifting was not marked with the maximum weight it was load tested to support. Reference:ANSI B30.20-1985, Chapter 20, Section 20-1.2 Markings and Construction, Paragraph 20-1.2.1 Markings: (a) Rated Load Marking. The rated load of the lifting device shall be marked on the main structure where it is visible. NOTE:Among other feasible and acceptable method to correct this hazard is to label the under-the-hook lifting device with the required information.ok
95012901
- Issued
- Sep 7, 2005
- Abate by
- Oct 25, 2005
- Penalty
- Initial $125 · Current $125
General-duty citation text
place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees: a)Glue area -- the under-the-hook lifting device, being used to lift 55 gallon drums of glue, was not provided with a load test prior to being placed into operation. Reference:ANSI B30.20-1985, Chapter 20, Section 20-1.4 Testing, Paragraph 20-1.4.2 Rated Load Test: Prior to initial use\, all new, altered, modified, or repaired lifting devices should be tested and inspected by or under the direction of a qualified person and a written report be furnished by such person, confirming the load rating of the lifter. NOTE:Among other acceptable and feasible methods to correct this hazard, one method is to have the under-the-hook lifting device immediately load tested.tely
1910.303 G02 I
- Issued
- Sep 7, 2005
- Abate by
- Sep 12, 2005
- Penalty
- Initial $350 · Current $350
1910.145 F03
- Issued
- Sep 7, 2005
- Abate by
- Sep 12, 2005
1910.303 B02
- Issued
- Sep 7, 2005
- Abate by
- Sep 12, 2005
1910.304 F06 I
- Issued
- Sep 7, 2005
- Abate by
- Sep 12, 2005
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- Sep 7, 2005
- Abate by
- Oct 25, 2005
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Sep 7, 2005
- Abate by
- Sep 12, 2005
1910.215 A04
- Issued
- Sep 7, 2005
- Abate by
- Sep 12, 2005
1910.215 B09
- Issued
- Sep 7, 2005
- Abate by
- Sep 12, 2005
1910.303 F
- Issued
- Sep 7, 2005
- Abate by
- Sep 19, 2005
1910.305 B01
- Issued
- Sep 7, 2005
- Abate by
- Sep 19, 2005
1910.305 B02
- Issued
- Sep 7, 2005
- Abate by
- Sep 12, 2005
1910.305 G01 III
- Issued
- Sep 7, 2005
- Abate by
- Sep 12, 2005
1910.305 G02 III
- Issued
- Sep 7, 2005
- Abate by
- Sep 12, 2005
More inspections at Skelly, Incorporated
View Skelly, Incorporated's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 321912)
More inspections in NC
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 308787241.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.