DENVER, CO —
OSHA Inspection: A-DU WELL AUTO SALVAGE
Accident-driven inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an accident-driven safety inspection of A-DU WELL AUTO SALVAGE in 5135 EMMERSON STREET, DENVER, CO 80216 (NAICS 423930). OSHA activity number 309004877.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- A-DU WELL AUTO SALVAGE
- Site address
- 5135 EMMERSON STREET
- City
- DENVER
- State
- CO
- ZIP
- 80216
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Accident-driven (A)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 423930
- SIC code (legacy)
- 5093
- Employees
- 4
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
12 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Aug 4, 2006
- Abate by
- Aug 30, 2006
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to caught-between and struck-by hazards: a)A-Du Well Auto Salvage & 5135 Emerson St. in Denver, CO: The employer did not ensure only trained and authorized operators were permitted to operate the rough terrain forklift. This condition exposed employees to caught-between and struck-by hazards. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to perform the following: ASME B56.6-1992, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Section 5.16.1 "Only trained and authorized operators shall be permitted to operate a rough terrain forklift truck. Operators of rough terrain forklift trucks shall be qualified as to visual, auditory, physical, and mental ability to operate the equipment safely according to paragraphs 5.17 and all other applicable parts of Section 5". NOTE: The ASME B56.6-1992 Section 5.16.1 standard can be obtained by contacting the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 345 East 47th Street, New Tork, NY 10017. b)A-Du Well Auto Salvage & 5135 Emerson St. in Denver, CO: The employer did not ensure an effective operator training program was developed and implemented. This condition exposed employees to caught-between and struck-by hazards. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to perform the following: ASME B56.6-1992, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Section 5.17.4 "An operator training program should consist of the following:" 1)Careful selection of the operator, considering physical qualifications, job attitude, and aptitude; 2)Emphasis on safety of stock, equipment, operator, and other personnel; 3)Citing of rules and whey there were formulated; 4)Basic fundamentals of rough terrain forklift truck and component design as related to safety, loading, mechanical limitations, center of gravity, stability, ect.; 5)Introduction to equipment, control locations, and functions. Explain how they work when used properly and problems when used improperly;6)Supervised practice on operating course remote from normal activity and designed to simulate actual operations; 7)Oral, written, and operational performance tests and evaluations during and at completion of the course; 8)Refersher courses, which may be condensed versions of the primary course, and periodic, "on job" operator evaluation: and 9)Understanding of nameplate data and operator instructions and warning information appearing on the rough terrain forklift truck. Note: The ASME B56.5-1992 Section 5.17.4 standard can be obtained by contacting the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 345 East 47th Street, New York, NY 10017. Abatement Note: Abatement certification and documentation are required for this item (See enclosed "Sample Abatement-Certification Letter").
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1400.00
- — Z (S) $2100.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Aug 4, 2006
- Abate by
- Aug 30, 2006
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $1,400 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to caught-between hazards: a)A-Du Well Auto Salvage & 5135 Emerson St. in Denver, CO: The employer did not ensure employees were kept from working under the elevated portion of rough terrain forklifts in that employees were permitted to work under elevated vehicles in order to remove parts. This condition exposed employees to caught-between hazards. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to perform the following: ASME B56.6-1992, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Section 6.2.7 "Do not allow anyone to stand or pass under the elevated portion of any rough terrain forklift truck, whether empty or loaded". NOTE: The ASME B56.6-1992 Section 6.2.7 standard can be obtained by contacting the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 345 East 47th Street, New Tork, NY 10017. Abatement Note: Abatement certification and documentation are required for this item (See enclosed "Sample Abatement-Certification Letter").-Certification
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1400.00
- — Z (S) $2100.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Aug 4, 2006
- Abate by
- Aug 30, 2006
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $1,300 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to caught-between and struck-by hazards: a)A-Du Well Auto Salvage & 5135 Emerson St. in Denver, CO: The employer did not ensure rough terrain forklift trucks were inspected prior to use and removed from service when unsafe conditions existed such as but not limited to a missing gas cap, a missing engine cover, a cracked windshield, hydraulic fluid leak, broken operator's panel, tires in poor condition, and broken lights. This condition exposed employees to caught-between and struck-by hazards. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to perform the following: ASME B56.6-1992, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Section 6.5.1.1 "If the rough terrain forklift truck is found to be in need of repair or in any way unsafe, or if it contributes to an unsafe condition, the matter shall be reported immediately to the user's designated authority, and the truck shall not be operated until it has been restored to safe operating condition. NOTE: The ASME B56.6-1992 Section 6.2.7 standard can be obtained by contacting the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 345 East 47th Street, New Tork, NY 10017. b)A-Du Well Auto Salvage & 5135 Emerson St. in DEnver, CO: The employer did not ensure the rough terrain forklift truck was inspected prior to use. This condition exposed employees to struck-by hazards. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to perform the following: ASME B56.6-1992, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Section 6.5.1 "At the beginning of each shift and before operating the rough terrain forklift truck, check its condition, giving special attention to": 1)Tires and their inflation pressure; 2)Warning devices; 3)Lights: 4)Lift and tilt systems, load-engaging means, chains, cables, and limit switches; 5)Brakes;6)Steering mechanism; and 7)Fuel system(s). Abatement Note: Abatement certification and documentation are required for this item (See enclosed "Sample Abatement-Certification Letter").-Certification
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1300.00
- — Z (S) $2100.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Aug 4, 2006
- Abate by
- Aug 30, 2006
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to caught-between hazards: a)A-Du Well Auto Salvage & 5135 Emerson St. in Denver, CO: The employer did not ensure the job-made base-mounted drum hoist was rated, constructed, inspected, maintained, and operated in accordance with the specifications of ASME B30.1-2001. This condition exposed employees to caught-between hazards. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to perform the following: ASME B30.7-2001, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Base-Mounted Drum Hoists. Deficiencies per this document include all sections of Chapters 7-1, 7-2, and 7-3 addressing items such as but not limited to: 1)Absence of load ratings, 2)Absence of markings (load rating, drum size, rope size, rated power supply); 3)Improper hoist and swinger mechanisms; 4)Braking systems; 5)Absence of guards; 6)Inspections of hoist, frames, welds, and ropes; 7)Testing of equipment; 8)Maintenance of equipment; and 9)Conditions set for operators. NOTE: The ASME B30.7-2001 standard can be obtained by contacting the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, Three Park Avenue, New York, NY 10016-5990. Abatement Note: Abatement certification and documentation are required for this item (See enclosed "Sample Abatement-Certification Letter").-Certification
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $500.00
- — Z (S) $2100.00
1910.101 B
- Issued
- Aug 4, 2006
- Abate by
- Aug 30, 2006
- Penalty
- Initial $1,050 · Current $500 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $500.00
- — Z (S) $1050.00
1910.147 C01
- Issued
- Aug 4, 2006
- Abate by
- Sep 22, 2006
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $1,000 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000.00
- — Z (S) $2100.00
1910.253 A03
- Issued
- Aug 4, 2006
- Abate by
- Aug 30, 2006
- Penalty
- Initial $1,050 · Current $400 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $400.00
- — Z (S) $1050.00
1910.303 F
- Issued
- Aug 4, 2006
- Abate by
- Sep 22, 2006
- Penalty
- Initial $600 · Current $250 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $250.00
- — Z (S) $600.00
1910.303 G01 I
- Issued
- Aug 4, 2006
- Abate by
- Aug 30, 2006
- Penalty
- Initial $600 · Current $250 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $250.00
- — Z (S) $600.00
1910.305 B02
- Issued
- Aug 4, 2006
- Abate by
- Aug 30, 2006
- Penalty
- Initial $600 · Current $250 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $250.00
- — Z (S) $600.00
1910.305 G02 II
- Issued
- Aug 4, 2006
- Abate by
- Aug 30, 2006
- Penalty
- Initial $1,050 · Current $250 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $250.00
- — Z (S) $1050.00
1910.305 G02 III
- Issued
- Aug 4, 2006
- Abate by
- Aug 30, 2006
More inspections at A-DU Well Auto Salvage
View A-DU Well Auto Salvage's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 423930)
More inspections in CO
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 309004877.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.