BURLINGTON, MA —
OSHA Inspection: UNICCO SERVICE COMPANY
Accident-driven inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an accident-driven safety inspection of UNICCO SERVICE COMPANY in SIX NEW ENGLAND EXECUTIVE PARK, BURLINGTON, MA 01803 (NAICS 561720). OSHA activity number 309008597.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- UNICCO SERVICE COMPANY
- Site address
- SIX NEW ENGLAND EXECUTIVE PARK
- City
- BURLINGTON
- State
- MA
- ZIP
- 01803
- Mailing
- 275 GROVE STREET, AUBURNDALE, MA 02466
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Accident-driven (A)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Y
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 561720
- SIC code (legacy)
- 7349
- Employees
- 18000
- Ownership type
- A
- Industry flags
- Construction safety.
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Dec 6, 2005
- Abate by
- Jan 25, 2006
- Penalty
- Initial $70,000 · Current $70,000
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that workers engaged in window washing operations were exposed to fall hazards, crushing hazards, and struck-by hazards resulting from an improperly rigged, anchored and/or operated outrigger beam suspension unit in such operations. (a) Location - Six New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA: On 6/8/2005, an employee washing windows while suspended from an improperly rigged, anchored and/or operated Fitch Mule Mid-Size Roof Roller on the building's flat roof top fell about 48 feet and then was struck by the Roof Roller when it rolled or fell off the roof top and landed on him. * The Roof Roller was not tied back to an anchorage point on the building, as per the manufacturer's instructions and ANSI/IWCA STD I-14.1-2001. * The Roof Roller was not equipped with sufficient weight in counterweights to provide for minimum weight and stability factors, e.g. the 4 to 1 safety ratio set forth in ANSI/IWCA STD I-14.1-2001 (or otherwise established in the manufacturer's instructions) regarding static position use and horizontal traveling position use. * The Roof Roller's 2 front wheels were improperly installed. * The employee tending the Roof Roller had little or no on-the-job training -- and no formal training at all -- in setting up, rigging, anchoring or using the Roof Roller, contrary to ANSI/IWCA STD I-1.1-2001. * Horizontal movement of the employee suspended from the Roof Roller occurred despite the absence of the requisite 4 to 1 safety ratio for stability in the Roof Roller as assembled and the absence of mandatory independent anchorage for the Roof Roller and the safety line as set forth in ANSI/IWCA STD I-1.1-2001. * The employee suspended from the Roof Roller did not drop down to the ground as per the manufacturer's instructions when the Roof Roller made angled turns around the perimeter of the roof. * No hazard assessment was performed prior to the start of the work. * No on-site inspection was performed prior to the start of the work. * No manufacturer's instructions were provided to the employee tending the Roof Roller, contrary to ANSI/IWCA STD I-14.1-2001. Among other methods, feasible and acceptable abatement methods to correct this hazard include but are not limited to: 1) Conduct comprehensive, effective hands-on training and testing, repeated periodically, to ensure that each employee engaged in window washing operations safely and properly rigs, anchors and operates the Roof Roller and any other outrigger beam suspension units used in such operations. Such training shall be conducted in employees' native language(s). Do not permit employees to engage in window washing operations with outrigger beam suspension units until they have completed such training and testing in a satisfactory manner. 2) When scheduling work to be performed, ensure that a competent person conducts a full and complete on-site inspection and hazard assessment for the rigging, anchoring and operation of outrigger beam suspension units to be used in the window washing operation. A competent person is defined as a person who is capable of identifying existing and predictable hazards with respect to window washing operations and who is authorized to take prompt corrective measures to eliminate such hazards. 3) Ensure that warning signs on equipment are written in the native language(s) spoken by employees. 4) Ensure that outrigger beam suspension units such as the Roof Roller are assembled according to the manufacturers' instructions and provide a minimum 4 to 1 safety ratio on each worksite as set forth in ANSI/IWCA STD I-14.1-2001. By way of example this includes but is not limited to ensuring that: (a) the front wheels of the Roof Roller - which serve as the fulcrum point of the outrigger beam - are properly positioned along the beam and also that they are properly installed with respect to the vertical positioning bolts, with regard to the job needs at each worksite; and (b) sufficient weight in counterweights is calculated -- with due regard for the fulcrum point and the safety ratio -- then installed on the Roof Roller. 5) Ensure that outrigger beam suspension units such as the Roof Roller are anchored & tied back to a secure anchorage point on the building at all times when in use as required by ANSI/IWCA STD I-14.1-2001 and the manufacturer's instructions 6) Do not use outrigger beam suspension units such as the Roof Roller on a roof with no parapet wall unless the roof edge is otherwise guarded so as to prevent roll off. 7) Assign a competent person to each job site and ensure that (s)he inspects the set up, rigging, anchorage, counterweights and all aspects of the Roof Roller &/or any other outrigger beam suspension unit prior to and during each use. A competent person is defined as a person who is capable of identifying existing and predictable hazards with respect to window washing operations and who is authorized to take prompt corrective measures when needed.
Recent events (2)
- — F (R) $70000.00
- — Z (W) $70000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Dec 6, 2005
- Abate by
- Dec 9, 2005
- Penalty
- Initial $70,000 · Current $70,000
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that workers engaged in window washing operations were exposed to fall hazards resulting from improperly rigged &/or anchored personal fall protection equipment and an improperly anchored Sky Genie Descent Control chair system. (a) Location - Six New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA: On or about 6/8/2005, an employee washing windows while suspended in a Sky Genie Descent Control chair and wearing a full-body safety harness with an attached lifeline fell about 48 feet. A single 1/2 inch Kernmantle rope was used as both the Descent Control chair support line and the full-body safety harness life line. This single rope line was connected to a single anchorage point on the unanchored Fitch Mule Mid-Size Roof Roller. When the Roof Roller rolled off the roof, the employee fell to the ground below and was injured. (b) Location - Six New England Executive Park, Burlington, MA: On or about 6/8/2005, an employee tending the roof top Fitch Mule Mid-Size Roof Roller, engaged in window washing operations, was wearing a full-body safety harness with a retractable lanyard that was anchored to the unanchored Fitch Mule Mid-Size Roof Roller. When the Roof Roller rolled off the flat roof with an unguarded roof edge, the employee was catapulted off the roof by his lanyard attached to the Roof Roller. He fell 53 feet to his death. For both Instance (a) and Instance (b): The two employees noted in (a) and (b) constituted the window washing crew. Communication between these crew members was problematic because one employee's native language was Portuguese, the other employee's native language was Spanish, and neither employee was fluent in English. The employer supplied these two employees with two ropes for a set-up that required a minimum of four ropes for safety purposes as follows: --1 rope to tie back the Roof Roller to a secure anchorage point on the building --1 rope for the support line of the Sky Genie Descent Control chair --1 rope for the life line of the window washing employee suspended in the Descent Control chair --1 rope for the life line of the employee tending the Roof Roller on the roof top Among other methods, feasible and acceptable abatement methods to correct this hazard include but are not limited to: 1) Conduct comprehensive, effective hands-on training and testing, repeated periodically, to ensure that each employee engaged in window washing operations understands and uses the safe working practices applicable to his work and his equipment, including but not limited to: * use of independent ropes for his life line and for his support equipment such as the descent chair; * use of independent anchorage points for his life line and for his support equipment such as the descent chair; and * use of the support equipment such as the descent chair and the fall protection systems in accord with the manufacturer's instructions and ANSI/IWCA I 14.1 2001, especially with regard to warnings and design limitations. Such training shall be conducted in employees' native language(s). Do not permit employees to engage in window washing operations until they have completed such training and testing in a satisfactory manner. 2) When scheduling work to be performed, ensure that a competent person conducts a complete and comprehensive on-site hazard assessment to ensure: * that all necessary equipment and personal fall protection equipment is listed and brought to the site, including a sufficient number of ropes for life lines and equipment support lines; * that there are sufficient independent anchorage points for personal fall protection life lines and equipment support lines; * that each anchorage point to be used for such life lines is independent and capable of holding a 5000 lb load; and * that each anchorage point to be used for life lines will not be used simultaneously to support equipment. A competent person is defined as a person who is capable of identifying existing and predictable hazards with respect to window washing operations and who is authorized to take prompt corrective measures to eliminate such hazards. 3) Assign a competent person to each work site and ensure that all work practices for window cleaning operations are performed under his/her supervision, including but not limited to the following: * Prior to the start of work, the competent person shall ensure that sufficient ropes are on site to provide adequate numbers of rope for each support line, life line, and any other mandatory lines (such as tie back lines for Roof Roller equipment) needed to perform the assigned work in a safe manner. * Prior to the start of work and during the work, ensure that a competent person inspects all anchorage points, oversees each employee's proper use of independent anchorage points for equipment lines and fall protection life lines, and oversees each employee's proper use of independent ropes for equipment lines (such as the line supporting each descent chair) and for fall protection life lines. A competent person is defined as a person who is capable of identifying existing and predictable hazards with respect to window washing operations and who is authorized to take prompt corrective measures to eliminate such hazards.
Recent events (2)
- — F (R) $70000.00
- — Z (W) $70000.00
1910.132 E
- Issued
- Dec 6, 2005
- Abate by
- Dec 9, 2005
- Penalty
- Initial $12,500 · Current $70,000
Recent events (2)
- — F (R) $70000.00
- — Z (R) $12500.00
More inspections at Unicco Service Company
View Unicco Service Company's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 561720)
More inspections in MA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 309008597.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.