ST. FRANCISVILLE, LA —
OSHA Inspection: WAGNER & ASSOCIATES, L.L.C.
Unprogrammed Related inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related safety inspection of WAGNER & ASSOCIATES, L.L.C. in MISSIPPI RIVER, MILE MARKER 259.3, ST. FRANCISVILLE, LA 70775 (NAICS 237310). OSHA activity number 309087385.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- WAGNER & ASSOCIATES, L.L.C.
- Site address
- MISSIPPI RIVER, MILE MARKER 259.3
- City
- ST. FRANCISVILLE
- State
- LA
- ZIP
- 70775
- Mailing
- 8068 HWY 944, GONZALES, LA 70737
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Unprogrammed Related (G)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 237310
- SIC code (legacy)
- 1622
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Dec 8, 2006
- Abate by
- Dec 20, 2006
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $1,500
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish to each of his employees a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to struck-by hazards: a) The employer did not insure that employee(s) designated to operate a barge-mounted crane to extract spuds and drill casing from the Mississippi River had been trained or had previous experience in the marine operation they were assigned to perform. Employee(s) were exposed to a crane boom overload and failure. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method to abate the hazard includes, but is not limited to, implementation of the required elements of ASME B30.8-2004, Floating Cranes And Derricks, chapter 8-3 Operation, section .1.2, Qualifications for Operators, subsection (a) which states, "Operators shall be required by the employer to pass a written or oral examination and a practical operation examination unless satisfactory evidence of qualifications and experience can be furnished. Qualifications shall be limited to the specific type of equipment for which examined." DISCLAIMERS: 1) You are not limited to the abatement methods suggested above. 2) The methods explained are general and may not be effective in all cases. 3) The employer is responsible for selecting and carrying out an appropriate method.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1500.00
- — Z (S) $1500.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Dec 8, 2006
- Abate by
- Dec 18, 2006
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $2,100
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish to each of his employees a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the hazard of crane collapse: a) Employees were exposed to the hazards of boom overload and failure during barge- mounted truck crane ("Lima" BLH, 50-Ton, model 500T, #3511-12) operations to extract a drill casing of unknown weight from the Mississippi River. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method to abate the hazard includes, but is not limited to, adherence to the required elements of ASME B30.8-2004, Floating Cranes And Derricks, chapter 8-3 Operating Practices, section .2.1, Load Weight, subsection (a) which states, "No crane or derrick shall be loaded beyond the load rating, except for test purposes as provided in section 8-2.2." DISCLAIMERS: 1) You are not limited to the abatement methods suggested above. 2) The methods explained are general and may not be effective in all cases. 3) The employer is responsible for selecting and carrying out an appropriate method.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2100.00
- — Z (S) $2100.00
1926.550 A06
- Issued
- Dec 8, 2006
- Abate by
- Dec 20, 2006
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $1,500
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1500.00
- — Z (S) $1500.00
1926.550 F01 I
- Issued
- Dec 8, 2006
- Abate by
- Dec 20, 2006
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S) $1500.00
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 237310)
More inspections in LA
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 309087385.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.