Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: THUNDER DISASTER SERVICES, INC.

Referral inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of THUNDER DISASTER SERVICES, INC. in NEWMAN ROAD, MOBILE, AL 36695 (NAICS 562119). OSHA activity number 309100279.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Thunder Disaster Services, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Thunder Disaster Services, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
NEWMAN ROAD
City
MOBILE
State
AL
ZIP
36695
Mailing
P.O. BOX 853, HAZELWOOD, NC 28738
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
N
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
562119
SIC code (legacy)
4212
Employees
10
Ownership type
A

1 citation on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 1, 2005
Abate by
Dec 6, 2005
Penalty
Initial $1,500 · Current $750 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not furnish employment
and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that
were causing or likely to cause
death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed
to struck-by hazards:
West side lane of Newman Road, Mobile County, Alabama:
a1.On October 2, 2005, an employee working as a flag person was struck by
a vehicle while directing
traffic. The work zone signs alerting drivers of the work ahead and the
presence of a flag person were
not properly spaced.
a2.On October 3, 2005, an employee working as a flag person was exposed to
struck-by hazards in that
the warning signs alerting the drivers of the work ahead and the presence
of a flag person were not
properly spaced.
b.On October 2, 2005, an employee working as a flag person was struck by a
vehicle
because the flag
person was standing on the road instead of standing on the shoulder.
Among other methods, one feasible abatement method to abate these hazards
is by assuring that the warning
signs are spaced 500 feet from each other and by assuring that the flag
person stands on the shoulder of the
road. Reference Part VI Section 6C.04 Advance Warning Area and Section
6E.05 Flagger Stations of the
Manual on Uniform Control Devices (MUTCD) 2000 Millennium Edition.um
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $750.00
  • · Z (S) $1500.00

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 309100279.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.