ASHEVILLE, NC ·
OSHA Inspection: CAROLINA STONE WORKS, INC.
Planned inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of CAROLINA STONE WORKS, INC. in 176 CLINGMAN AVENUE, ASHEVILLE, NC 28801 (NAICS 327991). OSHA activity number 309112134.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- CAROLINA STONE WORKS, INC.
- Site address
- 176 CLINGMAN AVENUE
- City
- ASHEVILLE
- State
- NC
- ZIP
- 28801
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (N)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 327991
- SIC code (legacy)
- 3281
- Employees
- 7
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
- Industry flags
- Manufacturing health.
Citations
17 citations on file for this inspection.
95012901
- Issued
- Aug 15, 2005
- Abate by
- Aug 25, 2005
- Penalty
- Initial $125 · Current $125
General-duty citation text
North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of North Carolina: The employer did not furnish to each of his employees conditions of employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees: a) Facility, Shop - The Coffing 1 Ton Underhung Jib Crane used to lift marble / granite slabs, was not being inspected as required. Reference:ANSI B30.16-2003, Chapter 16-2, Section 16-2.1 Inspection, Paragraph 126-2.1.1 Inspection Classification. (a)Prior to initial use, all new, altered, modified hoists shall be inspected by a designated person to ensure compliance with this standard. (b)Inspection Intervals. Inspection procedures for hoists in regular service is divided into two general classifications based upon the intervals at which inspections should be performed. (1)Frequent Inspection (2)Periodic Inspection NOTE:Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method to correct this hazard is to conduct hoist inspections as required.
95012901
- Issued
- Aug 15, 2005
- Abate by
- Sep 9, 2005
- Penalty
- Initial $125 · Current $125
General-duty citation text
North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of North Carolina: The employer did not furnish to each of his employees conditions of employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees: a) Facility, Shop Area - The Coffing 1 Ton Underhung Jib Crane had not been load tested as required. Reference:ANSI B30.16-2, Section 16-2.2 Testing, Paragraph 16-2.2.2 Load Tests (b)Electric Powered or Air Powered Hoists (1)Complete new hoists shall be dynamically load tested by the manufacturer as specified in paragraphs 16-2.2.1(b)(1) and (2) with a load test not less than 125of the rated load, except that if testing cannot be performed by the manufacturer, the user shall be notified and the load test shall be accomplished at another location or job site, by or under the direction of a designated person prior to the hoist being placed into service. (The user is testing the complete structure whether or not the hoist was tested by the manufacturer.) (c)The person conducting the load test shall prepare a written report of the load sustained during the test and the operations performed during the test. Reports must be place on file. NOTE: Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method to correct this hazard is to load test the underhung hoist as required and maintain a record of the load test.
95012901
- Issued
- Aug 15, 2005
- Abate by
- Aug 25, 2005
- Penalty
- Initial $125 · Current $125
General-duty citation text
North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of North Carolina: The employer did not furnish to each of his employees conditions of employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees: a) Facility, Shop Area - There was no safety latch on the hook on the Coffing 1 Ton Underhung Jib Crane. Reference:ANSI B30.16-2003, Chapter 16-1, Section 16-1.2 Construction, Paragraph 16-1.2.9 Hooks (a)If hooks are of the swiveling type, they should rotate freely. Hooks shall be equipped with latches unless use of the latch creates a hazardous condition. NOTE: Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method to correct this hazard is to install a safety switch onto the hook.
95012901
- Issued
- Aug 15, 2005
- Abate by
- Sep 9, 2005
- Penalty
- Initial $125 · Current $125
General-duty citation text
North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of North Carolina: The employer did not furnish to each of his employees conditions of employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees: a) Facility, Shop Area - The rail of the Coffing 1 Ton Underhung Jib Crane did not contain a posted rated load. Reference: ANSI B30.11-1998, Chapter 11-1, Section 11-1.1 Markings, Paragraph 11-1.1.1 Rated Load Markings - Crane. The rated load of the crane shall be marked on the crane and if the crane has more than one hoisting unit, each hoist shall have its rated load marked on the hoist or it load block so that the rated load marking shall be legible from the ground or floor. The combined load on all hoists on the crane shall not exceed the rated load of the crane. NOTE: Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method to correct this hazard is to properly mark the rated load on the components of the system.
95012901
- Issued
- Aug 15, 2005
- Abate by
- Aug 25, 2005
- Penalty
- Initial $125 · Current $125
General-duty citation text
North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of North Carolina: The employer did not furnish to each of his employees conditions of employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees: a) Facility, Shop - Inspections of the under hook lifting device, attached to the Coffing 1 Ton Underhung Jib Crane used to lift marble / granite slabs, was not being inspected as required. Reference:ANSI B30.20-1985, Section 20-1.3 Inspections, Paragraph 20-1.3.1 Inspection Classification. (a)Prior to initial use, all new, altered, modified, or repaired lifting devices shall be inspected by a designated person to ensure compliance with this standard. (b)Inspection Intervals. Inspection procedures for lifters in regular service is divided into two general classifications based upon the intervals at which inspections are to be performed. (1)Frequent inspection. (2)Periodic inspection. NOTE: Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method to correct this hazard is to conduct frequent and periodic inspections as required.
95012901
- Issued
- Aug 15, 2005
- Abate by
- Sep 9, 2005
- Penalty
- Initial $125 · Current $125
General-duty citation text
North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of North Carolina: The employer did not furnish to each of his employees conditions of employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees: a) Facility, Shop - The under the hook lifting device, attached to the Coffing 1 Ton Underhung Jib Crane used to lift marble / granite slabs, had not been load tested as required. Reference:ANSI B30.20-1985, Chapter 20-1, Section 20-1.4 Testing, Paragraph 20-1.4.1 Operational Tests. Prior to initial use, all new, altered, modified, or repaired lifting devices shall be tested to ensure compliance with this standard, including the following functions: (a)Moving parts. Lifters with moving parts shall be tested to determine that a lifter operates in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions. NOTE: Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method to correct this hazard is to properly load test the under the hook lifting device as required.
95012901
- Issued
- Aug 15, 2005
- Abate by
- Sep 9, 2005
- Penalty
- Initial $125 · Current $125
General-duty citation text
North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of North Carolina: The employer did not furnish to each of his employees conditions of employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees: a) Facility, Shop Area - The rated load was not marked on the under the hook lifting device that was attached to the Coffing 1 Ton Underhung Jib Crane. Reference:ANSI B30.20-1985, Chapter 20-1, Section 20-1.2 Markings, Paragraph 20-1.1.2. (a)Rated load marking. The rated load of the lifting device shall be marked on the structure where it is visible. (b)Identification. A nameplate or other permanent marking shall be affixed displaying the following information: (1)Manufacturer's name (2)Serial number (3)Lifter weight, if over 100 lbs. (4)Rated load NOTE: Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method to correct this hazard is to properly mark the rated load on the below the hook lifting device.
1910.95 C01
- Issued
- Aug 15, 2005
- Abate by
- Sep 30, 2005
- Penalty
- Initial $125 · Current $125
81108111
1910.95 B01
- Issued
- Aug 15, 2005
- Abate by
- Sep 30, 2005
8110
1910.1000 C
- Issued
- Aug 15, 2005
- Abate by
- Sep 9, 2005
- Penalty
- Initial $350 · Current $350
9010
1910.1000 E
- Issued
- Aug 15, 2005
- Abate by
- Sep 30, 2005
9010
1910.134 C01
- Issued
- Aug 15, 2005
- Abate by
- Sep 9, 2005
1910.134 E01
- Issued
- Aug 15, 2005
- Abate by
- Sep 9, 2005
1910.134 F02
- Issued
- Aug 15, 2005
- Abate by
- Sep 9, 2005
1910.134 K03
- Issued
- Aug 15, 2005
- Abate by
- Sep 9, 2005
1910.134 C02 I
- Issued
- Aug 15, 2005
- Abate by
- Sep 9, 2005
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Aug 15, 2005
- Abate by
- Sep 30, 2005
More inspections at Carolina Stone Works, INC.
View Carolina Stone Works, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 327991)
More inspections in NC
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 309112134.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.