Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: WOLFF & DUNGEY, INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of WOLFF & DUNGEY, INC. in 325 TEMPLE STREET, SYRACUSE, NY 13202 (NAICS 331524). OSHA activity number 309377570.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Wolff & Dungey, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Wolff & Dungey, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
325 TEMPLE STREET
City
SYRACUSE
State
NY
ZIP
13202
Mailing
P.O. BOX 3673, SYRACUSE, NY 13220
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
N
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
331524
SIC code (legacy)
3365
Employees
15
Ownership type
A
Industry flags
Manufacturing safety.

13 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 03 6 instances 12 exposed
Issued
Mar 1, 2006
Abate by
Mar 6, 2006
Penalty
Initial $375 · Current $225 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not
furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards that
were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees in that employees
were exposed to THE HAZARD OF BEING STRUCK-BY:
a)Impeller Floor, Roll-Over Area, on or about 11/29/05: Employees using a
Ingersoll Rand one ton capacity air-powered wire rope hoist to lift poured
molds weighing approximately 500lbs. Hoist was not being inspected using
the
frequent and periodic procedures as specified in American Society of
Mechanical Engineers ASME B30.16-1993.
ABATEMENT NOTE: One means of abatement would be to ensure that the
Ingersoll Rand wire rope hoist be inspected per American Society of
Mechanical Engineers, ASME B30.16-1993, Chapter 16-2, Sections 16-2.1.1,
16-2.1.2 and 16-2.1.3.
b)Core Room, on or about 11/29/05: Employee using a 500lb.capacity air -
powered chain hoist to lift cores weighing up to 300lbs. Hoist was not
being
inspected using the frequent and periodic procedures as specified in
American
Society of Mechanical Engineers ASME B30.16-1993.
ABATEMENT NOTE: One means of abatement would be to ensure that the
air-powered chain hoist be inspected per American Society of Mechanical
Engineers, ASME B30.16-1993, Chapter 16-2, Sections 16-2.1.1, 16-2.1.2 and
16-2.1.3.
c)Impeller Floor, Roll-Over Area, on or about 11/29/05: The supporting
structure including monorail for the Ingersoll Rand one ton capacity air-
powered wire rope hoist was not designed nor rated to with stand the loads
and forces imposed by the hoist for the rated load. Hoist is used to lift
molds
weighing approximately 500lbs.
ABATEMENT NOTE: One means of abatement would be to have a qualified
person review the design of the supporting structure and establish rated
load
capacity as per American Society of Mechanical Engineers, ASME B30.16-
1993, Chapter 16-1, Section 16-1.3.2.
d)Impeller Floor, Roll-Over Area, on or about 11/29/05: Ingersoll Rand one
ton
capacity air-powered wire rope hoist used by employees to lift molds, the
upper limit device was inoperative in that employee could accidentally
raise
the load block into the hoist.
ABATEMENT NOTE: One means of abatement would be to follow the
procedure addressed in American Society of Mechanical Engineers,
ASMEB30.16-1993, Chapter 16-2, Section 16-2.1.2(c)(2), hoist upper limit
device is
inspected at the beginning of each shift.
e)Impeller Floor, Roll-Over Area, on or about 11/29/05: One below-the-hook
lifting device used to support molds and attach said load to a Ingersoll
Rand
one ton capacity air-powered hoist was not marked as to its rated capacity.
ABATEMENT NOTE: One means of abatement is to have a qualified person
review the design of th below-the-hook device and have its established
capacity marked on the device per American Society of Mechanical Engineers
ASME B30.20-1993, Chapter 20-1, Section 20-1.2.1.
f)Impeller Floor, Roll-Over Area, on or about 11/29/05: One below-the-hook
lifting device used to support molds and attach said load to a Ingersoll
Rand
one ton capacity air-powered hoist was not being inspected using the
frequent
and periodic procedures as specified in American Society of Mechanical
Engineers ASME B30.20-1993.
ABATEMENT NOTE: One means of abatement would to ensure that the
below-the-hook lifting device be inspected per American Society of
Mechanical Engineers ASME B30.20-1993, Chapter 20-1, Section 20-1.3.1.
Recent events (2)
  • — J (S) $225.00
  • — Z (S) $375.00

1910.37 B02

Serious Gravity 01 2 instances 8 exposed
Issued
Mar 1, 2006
Abate by
Mar 6, 2006
Penalty
Initial $225 · Current $135 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — J (S) $135.00
  • — Z (S) $225.00

1910.178 L06

Serious Gravity 01 3 instances 8 exposed
Issued
Mar 1, 2006
Abate by
Mar 6, 2006
Penalty
Initial $225 · Current $135 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — J (S) $135.00
  • — Z (S) $225.00

1910.178 P01

Serious Gravity 03 2 instances 8 exposed
Issued
Mar 1, 2006
Abate by
Mar 6, 2006
Penalty
Initial $375 · Current $225 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — J (S) $225.00
  • — Z (S) $375.00

1910.212 A01

Serious Gravity 01 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Mar 1, 2006
Abate by
Mar 6, 2006
Penalty
Initial $225 · Current $135 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — J (S) $135.00
  • — Z (S) $225.00

1910.212 A03 II

Serious Gravity 02 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 1, 2006
Abate by
Mar 6, 2006
Penalty
Initial $300 · Current $180 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — J (S) $180.00
  • — Z (S) $300.00

1910.213 B03

Serious Gravity 03 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 1, 2006
Abate by
Mar 6, 2006
Penalty
Initial $375 · Current $225 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — J (S) $225.00
  • — Z (S) $375.00

1910.243 B01

Serious Gravity 01 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Mar 1, 2006
Abate by
Mar 6, 2006
Penalty
Initial $225 · Current $135 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — J (S) $135.00
  • — Z (S) $225.00

1910.254 D09 III

Serious Gravity 01 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Mar 1, 2006
Abate by
Mar 6, 2006
Penalty
Initial $225 · Current $135 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — J (S) $135.00
  • — Z (S) $225.00

1910.304 F04

Serious Gravity 03 3 instances 12 exposed
Issued
Mar 1, 2006
Abate by
Mar 6, 2006
Penalty
Initial $375 · Current $225 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — J (S) $225.00
  • — Z (S) $375.00

1904.29 A

Other-than-serious Gravity 00 2 instances 12 exposed
Issued
Mar 1, 2006
Abate by
Mar 6, 2006
Recent events (2)
  • — J (O)
  • — Z (O)

1910.132 D01

Other-than-serious Gravity 01 10 instances 15 exposed
Issued
Mar 1, 2006
Abate by
Apr 10, 2006
Recent events (2)
  • — J (O)
  • — Z (O)

1910.1200 H01

Other-than-serious Gravity 01 1 instance 15 exposed
Issued
Mar 1, 2006
Abate by
Mar 6, 2006
Recent events (2)
  • — J (O)
  • — Z (O)

View Wolff & Dungey, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 309377570.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.