Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: GE ENGINE SERVICES, INC.

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of GE ENGINE SERVICES, INC. in 3024 SYMMES ROAD, HAMILTON, OH 45015 (NAICS 336412). OSHA activity number 309490704.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch GE Engine Services, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for GE Engine Services, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
3024 SYMMES ROAD
City
HAMILTON
State
OH
ZIP
45015
Mailing
3024 SYMMES ROAD, HAMILTON, OH 45014
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
N
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
336412
SIC code (legacy)
3724
Employees
190
Ownership type
A
Industry flags
Manufacturing safety.

3 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 03 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 28, 2005
Abate by
Jan 10, 2006
Penalty
Initial $1,625 · Current $1,000 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not
furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards that
were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees in that employees
were exposed to:
Employees working with, and in the vicinity of, loads suspended from the 1
ton jib crane in the
Blohm Grinder Room were exposed to the hazard of being struck by falling
loads as a result of
improper rigging in that eye bolts used as lifting eyes were the incorrect
type or size bolts for
the purpose. In some instances the eye bolts were too small to fully
accommodate the load hooks
of the double legged chain sling that was used to attach the load to the
crane. In other instances
shoulderless eye bolts were used to rig the loads and were then pulled at
an angle, or shouldered
eye bolts were either not inserted to their full depth or were not used
with spacers to shim
between the bolt's shoulder and the load surface.
Among others, feasible and acceptable means to correct this hazard would
be to follow safe
rigging practices for the use of eye bolts such as, but not limited to,
those published in The
Rigging Manual of the Construction Safety Association of Ontario.
Recent events (2)
  • — F (S) $1000.00
  • — Z (S) $1625.00

1910.147 C04 II

Deleted Serious Gravity 03 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 28, 2005
Abate by
Jan 3, 2006
Penalty
Initial $1,625
Recent events (2)
  • — F (S)
  • — Z (S) $1625.00

1910.303 G02 II

Deleted Serious Gravity 03 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 28, 2005
Abate by
Jan 3, 2006
Penalty
Initial $1,625
Recent events (2)
  • — F (S)
  • — Z (S) $1625.00

View GE Engine Services, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 309490704.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.