HAMILTON, OH —
OSHA Inspection: GE ENGINE SERVICES, INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of GE ENGINE SERVICES, INC. in 3024 SYMMES ROAD, HAMILTON, OH 45015 (NAICS 336412). OSHA activity number 309490704.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- GE ENGINE SERVICES, INC.
- Site address
- 3024 SYMMES ROAD
- City
- HAMILTON
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 45015
- Mailing
- 3024 SYMMES ROAD, HAMILTON, OH 45014
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 336412
- SIC code (legacy)
- 3724
- Employees
- 190
- Ownership type
- A
- Industry flags
- Manufacturing safety.
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Dec 28, 2005
- Abate by
- Jan 10, 2006
- Penalty
- Initial $1,625 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: Employees working with, and in the vicinity of, loads suspended from the 1 ton jib crane in the Blohm Grinder Room were exposed to the hazard of being struck by falling loads as a result of improper rigging in that eye bolts used as lifting eyes were the incorrect type or size bolts for the purpose. In some instances the eye bolts were too small to fully accommodate the load hooks of the double legged chain sling that was used to attach the load to the crane. In other instances shoulderless eye bolts were used to rig the loads and were then pulled at an angle, or shouldered eye bolts were either not inserted to their full depth or were not used with spacers to shim between the bolt's shoulder and the load surface. Among others, feasible and acceptable means to correct this hazard would be to follow safe rigging practices for the use of eye bolts such as, but not limited to, those published in The Rigging Manual of the Construction Safety Association of Ontario.
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $1000.00
- — Z (S) $1625.00
1910.147 C04 II
- Issued
- Dec 28, 2005
- Abate by
- Jan 3, 2006
- Penalty
- Initial $1,625
Recent events (2)
- — F (S)
- — Z (S) $1625.00
1910.303 G02 II
- Issued
- Dec 28, 2005
- Abate by
- Jan 3, 2006
- Penalty
- Initial $1,625
Recent events (2)
- — F (S)
- — Z (S) $1625.00
More inspections at GE Engine Services, INC.
View GE Engine Services, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 336412)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 309490704.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.