READING, OH —
OSHA Inspection: ROHM AND HAAS CHEMICALS, LLC
Accident-driven inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an accident-driven health inspection of ROHM AND HAAS CHEMICALS, LLC in 2000 WEST STREET, READING, OH 45215 (NAICS 325199). OSHA activity number 309702538.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ROHM AND HAAS CHEMICALS, LLC
- Site address
- 2000 WEST STREET
- City
- READING
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 45215
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Accident-driven (A)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 325199
- SIC code (legacy)
- 2869
- Employees
- 125
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
10 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- May 12, 2006
- Abate by
- Jun 29, 2006
- Penalty
- Initial $5,000 · Current $5,000
1480
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or were likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that workers were exposed to contact with or inhalation of process chemicals or gases capable of causing serious injury or illness such as: a) On or about February 15, 2006, maintenance workers were exposed to the hazards created by excessive airborne levels of hydrogen sulfide in Building #3 where: (a) No line breaking permits were completed for opening process equipment; (b) No locking out or tagging out of valving leading to the 4D Ejection system was performed; (c) No isolating of the vent/drain line for the 4D Ejectors was performed; (d) No pre-flushing of the system with water was performed to remove materials which could liberate Hydrogen Sulfide (also, pre-flushing could detect the presence of blockages and leaks in the system); and, (e) No air monitoring was done of any potentially hazardous hydrogen sulfide, carbon monoxide or flammable vapor levels. b) Chemical operators regularly opened up process equipment in order to clean or replace traps and filters without performing any air monitoring, locking or tagging out of the equipment to be serviced, and completing a Line Breaking Permit and Lockout/Tagout Permit, potentially exposing them to process chemical contact or inhalation hazards. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method to correct this hazard is to completely implement an equipment opening procedure that includes appropriate: pre- flushing, and air monitoring for all potential chemical hazards that could be reasonably expected in the building or process area where the work is taking place and that is applicable to both operations workers and maintenance workers.nce
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $5000.00
- — Z (S) $5000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- May 12, 2006
- Abate by
- Aug 11, 2006
- Penalty
- Initial $5,000 · Current $5,000
1480
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or were likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that the Process Hazard Analysis performed by the employer did not address the following conditions that created hydrogen sulfide exposure hazards to workers: a) The HAZOP performed in 2001 on the 2MET and TO26 processes did not address the following conditions: (1) 2-Mercapto Ethanol begins to decompose at 150 degrees Celsius, releasing highly toxic and flammable Hydrogen Sulfide gas; (2) Any 2-Mercapto Ethanol which passed through the condenser will encounter 160 degree Celsius steam lines; (3) Due to the presence of additives, any 2-Mercapto Ethanol which travels beyond the steam ejector system may polymerize and either partially or completely plug pipes through which it has the opportunity to travel, including the scrubber line and the surge tank vent line; (4) The absence of monitors in the scrubber line or in the surge tank vent line which would alert the operator in the control room to the presence of abnormal pressures or flow rates in these lines, which could be due to the presence of a blockage, such as 2-ME polymer; and (5) A common surge tank vent line which could become plugged was being used to vent both processes - to vent the 4E Ejector Vacuum System for the 2-MET Process and to vent the 4D Ejector Vacuum System for the TO-26 Process. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method to correct these hazards is to: (A) Install monitors into the scrubber line and into the surge tank vent line which would detect and alert the control room regarding any abnormalities in line flow rates and pressures which could be caused by an accumulating blockage in these lines; or (B) Test or inspect the Scrubber Line and the Surge Tank Vent Line for blockages on a frequent basis, and remove any accumulations of polymer which are found; (C) Install separate surge tank vent lines for the 4E System and for the 4D System; (D) Independently ventilate the drain lines for the Steam Ejector systems; (E) Install different types of vacuum systems which do not require the use of steam.e
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $5000.00
- — Z (S) $5000.00
1910.120 Q02 III
- Issued
- May 12, 2006
- Abate by
- May 17, 2006
- Penalty
- Initial $5,000 · Current $3,500 Reduced
1480
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3500.00
- — Z (S) $5000.00
1910.134 D01 III
- Issued
- May 12, 2006
- Abate by
- May 17, 2006
- Penalty
- Initial $5,000 · Current $4,000 Reduced
1480
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4000.00
- — Z (S) $5000.00
1910.1000 B02
- Issued
- May 12, 2006
- Abate by
- May 17, 2006
- Penalty
- Initial $5,000 · Current $4,000 Reduced
1480
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $4000.00
- — Z (S) $5000.00
1910.1000 E
- Issued
- May 12, 2006
- Abate by
- May 17, 2006
1480
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.147 D03
- Issued
- May 12, 2006
- Abate by
- Aug 11, 2006
- Penalty
- Initial $5,000 · Current $3,500 Reduced
1480
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3500.00
- — Z (S) $5000.00
1910.147 D04 I
- Issued
- May 12, 2006
- Abate by
- Aug 11, 2006
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.1200 D02
- Issued
- May 12, 2006
- Abate by
- Aug 11, 2006
- Penalty
- Initial $5,000 · Current $3,500 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3500.00
- — Z (S) $5000.00
1910.147 D06
- Issued
- May 12, 2006
- Abate by
- Aug 11, 2006
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
More inspections at Rohm and Haas Chemicals, LLC
View Rohm and Haas Chemicals, LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 325199)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 309702538.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.