Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,124Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-25 Last loaded 2026-08-28

OSHA Inspection: K & W WELL SERVICE, INC.

Accident-driven inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an accident-driven safety inspection of K & W WELL SERVICE, INC. in 5.2 MI EAST OF PRAGUE ON HWY 62 & THEN NORTH 3 MI, PRAGUE, OK 74864 (NAICS 213111). OSHA activity number 309791788.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch K & W Well Service, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for K & W Well Service, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
5.2 MI EAST OF PRAGUE ON HWY 62 & THEN NORTH 3 MI
City
PRAGUE
State
OK
ZIP
74864
Mailing
P.O. BOX 511, CUSHING, OK 74023
Inspection type
Accident-driven (A)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (N)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
213111
SIC code (legacy)
1381
Employees
4
Ownership type
Private (A)

6 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 29, 2007
Abate by
Jul 7, 2007
Penalty
Initial $2,500 · Current $1,500 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not
furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards
that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm:
At the jobsite on or about 02/22/07 the employer provided a well servicing
structure (work-
over rig) for employees use during a well service operation without (1)
the means being
available to secure the guywire system to anchors designed to support the
imposed loads and
(2) the stabilizer and guywire system not of the manufacture's original
equipment and design.
The employees were exposed to the type of hazards associated with
catastrophic failure of a
well servicing structure.
Among others, one feasible and acceptable method of abatement would be to
assure the rig is
rigged up in a safe manner in accordance with API Recommended Practice 54,
Recommended Practice for Occupational Safety for Oil and Gas Well Drilling
and Servicing
Operations, section 6.3, Preliminary Rig-Up Operations and Recommended
Practice 4G,
Recommended Practice for Use and Procedures for Inspection, Maintenance,
and Repair of
Drilling and Well Servicing Structures, section 13.3, Guywire End
Terminations and
Hardware.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1500.00
  • · Z (S) $2500.00

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 29, 2007
Abate by
Jul 7, 2007
Penalty
Initial $2,500 · Current $1,500 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not
furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards
that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm:
At the jobsite on or about 02/22/07 the employer provided a well servicing
structure (work-
over rig) for employees use during a well service operation without a
means of auxiliary
escape when and employee was working in the derrick or mast.  The employee
was exposed
to the type of hazards associated with the inability to escape from the
derrick or mast during
an emergency situation.
Among others, one feasible and acceptable method of abatement would be to
assure
the rig is
rigged up in a safe manner in accordance with API Recommended Practice 54,
Recommended Practice for Occupational Safety for Oil and Gas Well Drilling
and Servicing
Operations, section 6.10, Auxiliary Escape.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1500.00
  • · Z (S) $2500.00

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 29, 2007
Abate by
Jul 7, 2007
Penalty
Initial $2,500 · Current $1,500 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not
furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards
that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm:
At the jobsite on or about 02/22/07 the employer provided a well servicing
structure (work-
over rig) for employees use during a well service operation that had been
structurally
modified without the manufactures approval or the services of a qualified
person utilizing
accepted engineering practices.  (1) The manufacture's original derrick
had been removed
and replaced with a 96 foot Lee derrick.  (2) The original stabilizer
system had been
removed and replaced with hydraulic jack system.  (3) The original guywire
system had been
removed and modified with hardware of a lesser strength.  The employees
were
exposed to
the type of hazards associated with catastrophic failure of a well
servicing structure.
Among others, two feasible and acceptable method of abatement would be to:
Assure the rig modifications are made in accordance with API Recommended
Practice 4G,
Recommended Practice for Use and Procedures for Inspection, Maintenance,
and Repair of
Drilling and Well Servicing Structures, section 8, Modification/Upgrade.
OR
API Recommended Practice 54, Recommended Practice for Occupational Safety
for Oil and
Gas Well Drilling and Servicing Operations, section 9.2, Derricks and
Masts.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1500.00
  • · Z (S) $2500.00

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 29, 2007
Abate by
Jul 7, 2007
Penalty
Initial $2,500 · Current $1,500 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not
furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards
that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm:
At the jobsite on or about 02/22/07 the employer allowed employees to work
at heights
greater than 10 feet without a means of fall protection.  The employees
were exposed to the
type of hazards associated with falls from heights.
Among others, one feasible and acceptable method of abatement would be to
assure fall
protection is provided and worn in accordance with the requirements of API
Recommended
Practice 54, Recommended Practice for Occupational Safety for Oil and Gas
Well Drilling
and Servicing Operations, section 5.5, Fall Protection.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1500.00
  • · Z (S) $2500.00

1910.132 D01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 29, 2007
Abate by
Jul 7, 2007

1910.151 B

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Jun 29, 2007
Abate by
Jul 7, 2007
Penalty
Initial $2,500 · Current $1,500 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1500.00
  • · Z (S) $2500.00

View K & W Well Service, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 309791788.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.