Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ENVIRONMENTAL INKS AND COATINGS CORPORATION

Planned inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned health inspection of ENVIRONMENTAL INKS AND COATINGS CORPORATION in 1 QUALITY PRODUCTS ROAD, MORGANTON, NC 28655 (NAICS 325910). OSHA activity number 309978419.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Environmental Inks and Coatings Corporation — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Environmental Inks and Coatings Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1 QUALITY PRODUCTS ROAD
City
MORGANTON
State
NC
ZIP
28655
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
N
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
325910
SIC code (legacy)
2893
Employees
110
Ownership type
A
Industry flags
Manufacturing health.

7 citations on file for this inspection.

95012901

Serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 28, 2006
Abate by
Jul 11, 2006
Penalty
Initial $313 · Current $104 Reduced
North Carolina General Statue 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety and
Health Act of North Carolina:  The
employer did not furnish to each of his employees conditions of employment
and a place of employment which
were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause
death or serious physical harm to
employees:
a)  Facility, Shot Mill - The crane system was not load tested prior to
initial use.
REF:  ANSI B30.11-1998, Chapter 11-2, Paragraph 11-2.2.2.
(a)New, reinstalled, altered, repaired and modified equipment should be
load tested prior
to initial use as determined by a qualified person.
(b)If a load test is conducted, the load shall be not less than 100of
the rated load of the
equipment or more than 125of the rated load of the equipment, unless
otherwise
recommended by the manufacturer.
(c)If a load test is conducted, the person conducting the load test shall
prepare a written
report of the load sustained during the test and the operations performed
during the test.
Reports shall be placed on file.
NOTE:  Among other methods, one feasible acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to
conduct load testing of the crane system per the requirements of section
2.2.2 of ANSI B30-11-1998.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $104.33
  • — Z (S) $313.00

95012901

Serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 28, 2006
Abate by
Jul 11, 2006
Penalty
Initial $313 · Current $104 Reduced
North Carolina General Statue 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety and
Health Act of North Carolina:  The
employer did not furnish to each of his employees conditions of employment
and a place of employment which
were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause
death or serious physical harm to
employees:
a)  Facility, Shot Mill - The crane system was not inspected annually.
REF:  ANSI B30.11-1998, Chapter 11-2, Paragraph 11-2.1.3.
(a)Periodic inspections shall be performed at intervals defined in
paragraph 11-2.1.1(b)(2):
Visual inspection by an appointed person making records of apparent
external
conditions to provide the basis for a continuing evaluation, as follows:
normal
service,
equipment in place --- annually.
(b)A qualified person shall examine any deficiencies found during the
inspection to
determine whether conditions found constitute a hazard, require
disassembly for further
inspection, or require replacement.
NOTE:  Among other methods, one feasible acceptable abatement method to
correct this hazard is to
conduct annual, periodic inspections of the crane system per the
requirements of section 11-2.1.3 of
ANSI B30-11-1998.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $104.33
  • — Z (S) $313.00

95012901

Serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 28, 2006
Abate by
Jul 11, 2006
Penalty
Initial $313 · Current $104 Reduced
North Carolina General Statue 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety and
Health Act of North Carolina:  The
employer did not furnish to each of his employees conditions of employment
and a place of employment which
were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause
death or serious physical harm to
employees:
a)  Facility, Shot Mill - The rated load capacity was not displayed on the
side
of a crane structure.
REFERENCE: ANSI/ASME B30.11-1998 - Monorails and Underhung Cranes, Chapter
11-1 -
Construction and Installation, Section 11.1.1.1 - Rated Load Markings -
Crane:  The rated load of the
crane shall be marked on the crane, and if the crane has more than one
hoisting unit, each hoist shall
have its rated load marked on the hoist or its load block so that the
rated load marking shall be legible
from the ground or floor.  The combined load on all hoists on the crane
shall not exceed the rated load
of the crane.
NOTE:Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method to correct
this hazard is to
clearly mark or label the rated capacity of the system on both sides of
the hoist support
beam.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $104.33
  • — Z (S) $313.00

1910.151 C

Serious 1 instance 110 exposed
Issued
Jun 28, 2006
Abate by
Jul 25, 2006
Penalty
Initial $188 · Current $141 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $141.00
  • — Z (S) $188.00

1910.305 J02 II

Serious 2 instances 110 exposed
Issued
Jun 28, 2006
Abate by
Jul 11, 2006
Penalty
Initial $438 · Current $383 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $382.50
  • — Z (S) $438.00

1910.178 A06

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Jun 28, 2006
Abate by
Sep 27, 2006
Recent events (2)
  • — P (O)
  • — Z (O)

1910.304 F04

Other-than-serious 1 instance 110 exposed
Issued
Jun 28, 2006
Abate by
Jul 11, 2006

View Environmental Inks and Coatings Corporation's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 309978419.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.