HIGGINS, TX —
OSHA Inspection: BOOM DRILLING, LLC
Accident-driven inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an accident-driven safety inspection of BOOM DRILLING, LLC in CR T & CR 1454, HIGGINS, TX 79046 (NAICS 211111). OSHA activity number 310223847.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BOOM DRILLING, LLC
- Site address
- CR T & CR 1454
- City
- HIGGINS
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 79046
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 1087, WOODWARD, OK 73802
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Accident-driven (A)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 211111
- SIC code (legacy)
- 1311
- Employees
- 350
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Feb 8, 2007
- Abate by
- Feb 14, 2007
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500 · Current $4,500
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the condition(s) listed below: Boom Drilling, LLC, Rig #10, Jones Energy - Willis D Price 16-H, Lipscomb County, Texas. For the period of time up to and including 09/06/06, employees were exposed to struck-by hazards due to the lack of anti-two blocking or some other device that would positively prevent the traveling block from striking the crown block. The rig was equipped with a crown-o-matic, however it was not functioning. API Recommended Practice 54, Third Edition, April 1999, titled "Recommended Practice for Occupational Safety for Oil and Gas Drilling and Servicing Operations", states in Section 6, Paragraph 6.3.2, "Well operations involving the rig shall not be commenced until the rig is rigged up in a safe manner." Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to equip the drilling rig(s) with anti-two blocking, crown-o-matics or other positive devices that will prevent the traveling block from making contact with the crown block. "Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19(d), the employer must provide documentation that this violation has been abated within 10 calendar days after the abatement date."ent
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Feb 8, 2007
- Abate by
- Feb 14, 2007
- Penalty
- Initial $1,350 · Current $1,350
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the condition(s) listed below: Boom Drilling, LLC, Rig #10, Jones Energy - Willis D Price 16-H, Lipscomb County, Texas. For the period of time up to and including 09/06/06, the escape guywire was not flagged as per API RP 4G 14.5.f. API Recommended Practice 4G, Third Edition, June 2004, titled "Recommended Practice for Use and Procedures for Inspection, Maintenance, and Repair of Drilling and Well Servicing Structures", states in 14.5.f "The rig contractor shall be responsible for placing a visible marker on each guywire." Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to ensure escape lines are flagged with visible material as per API RP 4G. "Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19(d), the employer must provide documentation that this violation has been abated within 10 calendar days after the abatement date."
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Feb 8, 2007
- Abate by
- Feb 14, 2007
- Penalty
- Initial $1,350 · Current $1,350
1910.151 C
- Issued
- Feb 8, 2007
- Abate by
- Feb 14, 2007
1910.1200 E01 I
- Issued
- Feb 8, 2007
- Abate by
- Feb 14, 2007
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 211111)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 310223847.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.