HOUSTON, TX —
OSHA Inspection: WORLDWIDE OILFIELD MACHINE INC.
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of WORLDWIDE OILFIELD MACHINE INC. in 11809 CANEMONT, HOUSTON, TX 77035 (NAICS 332919). OSHA activity number 310267398.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- WORLDWIDE OILFIELD MACHINE INC.
- Site address
- 11809 CANEMONT
- City
- HOUSTON
- State
- TX
- ZIP
- 77035
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332919
- SIC code (legacy)
- 3494
- Employees
- 180
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
35 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jun 18, 2008
- Abate by
- Sep 15, 2008
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $2,100 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to being crushed: a) The employer did not protect employees from the recognized hazards of being struck by and caught between crane loads. In the production area where employees were using jib cranes to lift large valve parts, varying in weight from a couple hundred pounds to several thousand pounds. The cranes that were being used did not have load rating markings. The main production area is used to manufacture, machine and assemble oil field valves. The cranes were not labeled with the load capacities, and no load test documentation was available to determine the load capacity of the jib cranes being used in the facility among other methods of abatement, one feasible and acceptable method to correct this hazard is to complete load testing on all cranes and hoists, and label the cranes and hoists with the load capacity. (ANSI B30.11 section 11- 1.1.1) b) The employer did not protect employees from the recognized hazards of being struck by and crushed while operating Jib Cranes. Each control element was not clearly marked to indicate the direction of resultant motion. The pendants did not have any legible markings to indicate the direction of travel. Among other methods of abatement, one feasible and accepted method to correct this hazard is to replace the control pendant or label the pendants with the direction of travel. (ANSI B30.11 section 11-1.11.3) c) The employer did not implement a frequent inspection program to inspect cranes on a daily to monthly interval. The employer did not have a program in place to inspect the cranes to ensure the operating mechanisms are functioning properly. Among other methods of abatement, one feasible and accepted method to correct this hazard is to implement a frequent inspection program to identify malfunctioning operating mechanisms, excessive wear of components, all hoist and limit switches, deterioration or leakage of lines, tanks, valves, drain pumps or other parts of air or hydraulic systems. (ANSI B30.11 section 11-2.1.2 and section 11-2.3.3) d) The employer did not correct unsafe conditions disclosed during the periodic inspection before further use. The inspection identified both safety hazards and production critical components that were not corrected or addressed by the employer. An example of some of the items identified are as follows: hoist connection needs repair or replacement, holding brake needs adjusting, bottom block assembly needs replacement or repair, hook and latch needs replacing, control enclosure needs repair, mast needs repair, etc. Among other methods of abatement, one feasible and accepted method to correct this hazard is to repair the cranes. (ANSI B30.11 section 11- 2.1.2 and section 11-2.3.3) e) Employees were exposed to crushing injuries in an unexpected roll over of the Hyster Model fork lifts while moving a valve and valve parts. Employees were observed not using the installed seatbelts when rollover protection was present on the forklifts. (ANSI B56.1-1993, Part II, Paragraph 5.3.19), Among other methods of abatement, one feasible and acceptable method to correct this hazard is to require that all employees wear seatbelts during forklift operations.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2100.00
- — Z (S) $3500.00
1910.22 D01
- Issued
- Jun 18, 2008
- Abate by
- Jul 8, 2008
- Penalty
- Initial $1,750 · Current $1,100 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1100.00
- — Z (S) $1750.00
1910.95 C01
- Issued
- Jun 18, 2008
- Abate by
- Sep 15, 2008
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $2,100 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2100.00
- — Z (S) $3500.00
1910.95 D01
- Issued
- Jun 18, 2008
- Abate by
- Sep 15, 2008
- Penalty
- Initial $1,750 · Current $1,200 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1200.00
- — Z (S) $1750.00
1910.134 D01 I
- Issued
- Jun 18, 2008
- Abate by
- Jun 23, 2008
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $2,200 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2200.00
- — Z (S) $3500.00
1910.134 D01 II
- Issued
- Jun 18, 2008
- Abate by
- Jun 30, 2008
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.1026 G01 I
- Issued
- Jun 18, 2008
- Abate by
- Jun 23, 2008
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.147 C04 I
- Issued
- Jun 18, 2008
- Abate by
- Aug 5, 2008
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S) $3500.00
1910.147 C04 IID
- Issued
- Jun 18, 2008
- Abate by
- Aug 5, 2008
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.147 D06
- Issued
- Jun 18, 2008
- Abate by
- Aug 5, 2008
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S) $3500.00
1910.176 B
- Issued
- Jun 18, 2008
- Abate by
- Jun 30, 2008
- Penalty
- Initial $1,750 · Current $1,100 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1100.00
- — Z (S) $1750.00
1910.178 G02
- Issued
- Jun 18, 2008
- Abate by
- Aug 5, 2008
- Penalty
- Initial $1,400 · Current $1,100 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1100.00
- — Z (S) $1400.00
1910.178 L01 I
- Issued
- Jun 18, 2008
- Abate by
- Aug 5, 2008
- Penalty
- Initial $1,750 · Current $1,100 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1100.00
- — Z (S) $1750.00
1910.178 N04
- Issued
- Jun 18, 2008
- Abate by
- Jul 15, 2008
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.184 C01
- Issued
- Jun 18, 2008
- Abate by
- Sep 15, 2008
- Penalty
- Initial $1,750 · Current $1,100 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1100.00
- — Z (S) $1750.00
1910.184 D
- Issued
- Jun 18, 2008
- Abate by
- Aug 5, 2008
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.184 E02 II
- Issued
- Jun 18, 2008
- Abate by
- Sep 15, 2008
- Penalty
- Initial $1,750 · Current $1,100 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1100.00
- — Z (S) $1750.00
1910.215 A04
- Issued
- Jun 18, 2008
- Abate by
- Jul 8, 2008
- Penalty
- Initial $1,750 · Current $1,100 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1100.00
- — Z (S) $1750.00
1910.215 B09
- Issued
- Jun 18, 2008
- Abate by
- Jun 23, 2008
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.242 B
- Issued
- Jun 18, 2008
- Abate by
- Jul 15, 2008
- Penalty
- Initial $1,750 · Current $1,200 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1200.00
- — Z (S) $1750.00
1910.243 C01
- Issued
- Jun 18, 2008
- Abate by
- Sep 15, 2008
- Penalty
- Initial $2,450 · Current $1,400 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1400.00
- — Z (S) $2450.00
1910.253 B02 II
- Issued
- Jun 18, 2008
- Abate by
- Jul 8, 2008
- Penalty
- Initial $1,750 · Current $1,100 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1100.00
- — Z (S) $1750.00
1910.253 B04 I
- Issued
- Jun 18, 2008
- Abate by
- Jul 8, 2008
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.305 G02 II
- Issued
- Jun 18, 2008
- Abate by
- Jun 30, 2008
- Penalty
- Initial $1,750 · Current $1,100 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1100.00
- — Z (S) $1750.00
1910.305 G02 III
- Issued
- Jun 18, 2008
- Abate by
- Jun 30, 2008
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.1026 C
- Issued
- Jun 18, 2008
- Abate by
- Sep 15, 2008
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $2,300 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2300.00
- — Z (S) $3500.00
1910.1026 D01
- Issued
- Jun 18, 2008
- Abate by
- Sep 15, 2008
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.1026 E01
- Issued
- Jun 18, 2008
- Abate by
- Sep 15, 2008
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.1026 K01 IA
- Issued
- Jun 18, 2008
- Abate by
- Sep 15, 2008
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.1026 L02 IA
- Issued
- Jun 18, 2008
- Abate by
- Aug 5, 2008
- Penalty
- Initial $1,400 · Current $1,000 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000.00
- — Z (S) $1400.00
1910.1200 G01
- Issued
- Jun 18, 2008
- Abate by
- Sep 15, 2008
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.147 C04 I
- Issued
- Jun 18, 2008
- Abate by
- Sep 15, 2008
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $3,000 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $3000.00
- — Z (S) $3500.00
1910.147 C04 IID
- Issued
- Jun 18, 2008
- Abate by
- Sep 15, 2008
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.147 D06
- Issued
- Jun 18, 2008
- Abate by
- Sep 15, 2008
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S) $3500.00
1910.178 A06
- Issued
- Jun 18, 2008
- Abate by
- Sep 15, 2008
Recent events (2)
- — I (O)
- — Z (O)
More inspections at Worldwide Oilfield Machine INC.
View Worldwide Oilfield Machine INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332919)
More inspections in TX
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 310267398.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.