CHILLICOTHE, OH —
OSHA Inspection: PACCAR, INC., DBA KENWORTH TRUCK COMPANY
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of PACCAR, INC., DBA KENWORTH TRUCK COMPANY in 65 KENWORTH DRIVE, CHILLICOTHE, OH 45601 (NAICS 488490). OSHA activity number 310352026.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- PACCAR, INC., DBA KENWORTH TRUCK COMPANY
- Site address
- 65 KENWORTH DRIVE
- City
- CHILLICOTHE
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 45601
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 488490
- SIC code (legacy)
- 4231
- Employees
- 1750
- Ownership type
- A
- Industry flags
- Manufacturing safety.
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Nov 15, 2006
- Abate by
- Jan 4, 2007
- Penalty
- Initial $3,150
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to crushing hazards due to failure of hoists and its' components in that hoists were being left suspended and unattended for an extended amount of time and hoist operators were not adequately trained on operating procedures for operating hoists such as the DeMags and Yales in the following areas: (a)In the Axle area, operators left loads suspended on the Yale hoists for extended periods of time and, work under, near and around suspended and moving loads, and allowed their attention to be diverted during lifts, in that hoist operators were performing duties such as placing a piece of wood in the frame of the axle while operating the hoist. (b)In the Turnover area, operators operating the two Yale 5-ton turnover hoists were not aware of the weight of the load (chassis) lifted on the turnover hoists, and allowed their attention to be diverted when turning over the load in that hoist operators would use their foot to move the dollies into place and hold them in place while operating the hoists. (c)In the Cab Set area, operators operating the DeMag 2-ton hoists were working under suspended loads and working under loads (cabs) while they were still moving such as the cabs, left loads suspended (staging area) for an extended amount of time and had their attention diverted when operating the hoists in that operators would also move hoses while operating the hoists. (d)In the Engine Set area, operators operating the Yale 3-ton hoists left the load suspended and worked under and around the suspended loads (motors) and had their attention diverted while lifting loads in that the hoist operators' would move hoses under the load while operating the hoist. (e)In the Radiator Set area, operators operating the Yale hoists left the load suspended and worked under and around the suspended loads (radiators). (f)In the Staging area for cabs the control devices for the DeMag hoists were left unattended and the loads were left suspended for an extended amount of time. In the Axle Set area, Engine Set area and the Radiator Set area, loads were left suspended by chains for extended amounts of time. Among feasible abatement methods is to follow the recommendations of ANSI/ASME B30.16- 2003 and the manufacturer's of the Yale and DeMag hoist in regard to the operating instructions specified in the hoist manufacturer's manuals.urer's
Recent events (2)
- — F (S)
- — Z (S) $3150.00
1910.24 B
- Issued
- Nov 15, 2006
- Abate by
- Jan 4, 2007
- Penalty
- Initial $1,800
Recent events (2)
- — F (S)
- — Z (S) $1800.00
1910.184 C02
- Issued
- Nov 15, 2006
- Abate by
- Dec 12, 2006
- Penalty
- Initial $2,250 · Current $2,250
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $2250.00
- — Z (S) $2250.00
1910.184 D
- Issued
- Nov 15, 2006
- Abate by
- Dec 5, 2006
Recent events (2)
- — F (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.184 I01
- Issued
- Nov 15, 2006
- Abate by
- Sep 30, 2007
Recent events (2)
- — F (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.184 C09
- Issued
- Nov 15, 2006
- Abate by
- Jan 4, 2007
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500
Recent events (2)
- — F (S)
- — Z (S) $4500.00
1910.184 C09
- Issued
- Nov 15, 2006
- Abate by
- Jan 4, 2007
- Penalty
- Initial $49,500 · Current $4,500 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $4500.00
- — Z (W) $49500.00
More inspections at Paccar, INC., DBA Kenworth Truck Company
View Paccar, INC., DBA Kenworth Truck Company's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 488490)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 310352026.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.