RUSSELLVILLE, AR ·
OSHA Inspection: TYSON FOODS, INC. DBA TYSON VALLEY DISTRIBUTION CN
Accident-driven inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an accident-driven safety inspection of TYSON FOODS, INC. DBA TYSON VALLEY DISTRIBUTION CN in 4820 EAST MAIN ST., RUSSELLVILLE, AR 72802 (NAICS 493120). OSHA activity number 310355664.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- TYSON FOODS, INC. DBA TYSON VALLEY DISTRIBUTION CN
- Site address
- 4820 EAST MAIN ST.
- City
- RUSSELLVILLE
- State
- AR
- ZIP
- 72802
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Accident-driven (A)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (N)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 493120
- SIC code (legacy)
- 4222
- Employees
- 286
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
- Industry flags
- Manufacturing safety.
Citations
6 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 3, 2007
- Abate by
- Apr 28, 2007
- Penalty
- Initial $5,000 · Current $7,000
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed the hazard of falling from an elevation and/or being crushed by the weight of the truck: On or about October 16, 2006, and at times prior and after thereto, a Nissan powered industrial truck, Serial No. 9C2206, was being used to horizontally pull/drag loads by attaching chains to the backrest and personnel platform, exposing the truck operator and any bystanders to the hazards of being crushed or struck by the truck in the event of a tip-over, and the employee riding in the platform to the hazards of being ejected from the platform and a fall of approximately 28 feet. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method of abatement would be to ensure that loads are only lifted vertically and never dragged horizontally as required by ANSI/ITSDF B56.1-2005, Section 5.4.5(b).5,
Recent events (2)
- · F (S) $7000.00
- · Z (S) $5000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 3, 2007
- Abate by
- Apr 13, 2007
- Penalty
- Initial $5,000 · Current $5,000
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the hazards of falling from an elevation and/or struck-by: On or about October 16, 2006, and at times prior and after thereto, employees were exposed to falls and struck-by hazards where the personnel platform was attached to a Nissan Forklift, Serial No. 9C2206, and operated in a manner and condition for which it was not designed or intended: a) The operator of the forklift repeatedly maneuvered the vehicle horizontally forward and reverse with the personnel platform raised approximately 28 feet above the level below. Employees within the elevated personnel platform were exposed to the hazards of being thrown from the personnel platform by the sudden change in direction of the vehicle. b) The combined weights of the platform, personnel, and loads exceeded the industrial truck's capacity exemplified by the counterweight and rear wheels lifting from the floor while pulling and lifting pallets with the personnel basket and employee elevated. The platform used to lift personnel did not have information prominently displayed to indicate the maximum load, weight of platform, and minimum capacity of the truck on which it can be used. Among other methods, some feasible and acceptable abatement methods to correct these hazards are as follows: 1) Do not exceed one-half the capacity of the combined weight of the platform, load, and personnel as required by ANSI/ITSDF B56.1-2005, Section 4.17.3(o); 2) Place travel controls in neutral and set the parking brake when an employee is elevated on the platform as required by ANSI/ITSDF B56.1-2005, Section 4.17.3 (g); 3) Maneuver the platform slowly, only for minor adjustments in horizontal positions when personnel are on the platform as required by ANSI/ITSDF B56.1-2005, Section 4.17.3(l); 4) Ensure all information is prominently indicated on the platform as required by ANSI/ITSDF B56.1-2005, Section 7.37.3(i).
Recent events (2)
- · F (S) $5000.00
- · Z (S) $5000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Apr 3, 2007
- Abate by
- Apr 20, 2007
- Penalty
- Initial $2,125 · Current $2,125
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the hazard of falling from an elevation: On or about October 16, 2006, and at times prior and after thereto, employees were exposed to the hazards of falling approximately 28 feet to the level below when exiting and reentering the personnel platform attached to the Nissan forklift, Serial No. 9C2206 while attempting to free jammed pallets. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to use a piece of equipment designed to lift personnel to another platform or level equipped with a gate or door for safely entering and exiting as required by ANSI/ITSDF B56.1-2005, Sections 4.17.3(p) & (r) which prohibits using a platform attached to a forklift for entering and exiting except at ground level, and requires personnel to remain on the platform while in the basket.
Recent events (2)
- · F (S) $2125.00
- · Z (S) $2125.00
1910.178 P01
- Issued
- Apr 3, 2007
- Abate by
- Apr 20, 2007
- Penalty
- Initial $5,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · F (S) $1000.00
- · Z (S) $5000.00
1910.184 E09 I
- Issued
- Apr 3, 2007
- Abate by
- Apr 13, 2007
- Penalty
- Initial $2,500 · Current $500 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · F (O) $500.00
- · Z (S) $2500.00
1910.178 A06
- Issued
- Apr 3, 2007
- Abate by
- Apr 20, 2007
Recent events (2)
- · F (O)
- · Z (O)
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 493120)
More inspections in AR
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 310355664.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.