Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,196,249Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-20 Last loaded 2026-08-24

OSHA Inspection: TYSON FOODS, INC. DBA TYSON VALLEY DISTRIBUTION CN

Accident-driven inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an accident-driven safety inspection of TYSON FOODS, INC. DBA TYSON VALLEY DISTRIBUTION CN in 4820 EAST MAIN ST., RUSSELLVILLE, AR 72802 (NAICS 493120). OSHA activity number 310355664.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Tyson Foods, INC. DBA Tyson Valley Distribution CN for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Tyson Foods, INC. DBA Tyson Valley Distribution CN is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
4820 EAST MAIN ST.
City
RUSSELLVILLE
State
AR
ZIP
72802
Inspection type
Accident-driven (A)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (N)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
493120
SIC code (legacy)
4222
Employees
286
Ownership type
Private (A)
Industry flags
Manufacturing safety.

6 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Apr 3, 2007
Abate by
Apr 28, 2007
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $7,000
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish
employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized
hazards that were
causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in
that employees were
exposed the hazard of falling from an elevation and/or being crushed by
the weight of the truck:
On or about October 16, 2006, and at times prior and after thereto, a
Nissan powered
industrial truck, Serial No. 9C2206, was being used to horizontally
pull/drag loads by
attaching chains to the backrest and personnel platform, exposing the
truck operator and
any bystanders to the hazards of being crushed or struck by the truck in
the event of a
tip-over, and the employee riding in the platform to the hazards of being
ejected from
the platform and a fall of approximately 28 feet.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method of abatement would
be to
ensure that loads are only lifted vertically and never dragged
horizontally as required by
ANSI/ITSDF B56.1-2005, Section 5.4.5(b).5,
Recent events (2)
  • · F (S) $7000.00
  • · Z (S) $5000.00

5(a)(1)

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 5 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Apr 3, 2007
Abate by
Apr 13, 2007
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $5,000
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish
employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized
hazards that were
causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in
that employees were
exposed to the hazards of falling from an elevation and/or struck-by:
On or about October 16, 2006, and at times prior and after thereto,
employees were
exposed to falls and struck-by hazards where the personnel platform was
attached to a
Nissan Forklift, Serial No. 9C2206, and operated in a manner and condition
for which
it was not designed or intended:
a) The operator of the forklift repeatedly maneuvered the vehicle
horizontally forward
and reverse with the personnel platform raised approximately 28 feet above
the level
below. Employees within the elevated personnel platform were exposed to
the
hazards
of being thrown from the personnel platform by the sudden change in
direction of the
vehicle.
b) The combined weights of the platform, personnel, and loads exceeded the
industrial
truck's capacity exemplified by the counterweight and rear wheels lifting
from the floor
while pulling and lifting pallets with the personnel basket and employee
elevated. The
platform used to lift personnel did not have information prominently
displayed to indicate
the maximum load, weight of platform, and minimum capacity of the truck on
which it
can be used.
Among other methods, some feasible and acceptable abatement methods to
correct these
hazards are as follows:
1) Do not exceed one-half the capacity of the combined weight of the
platform,
load, and
personnel as required by ANSI/ITSDF B56.1-2005, Section 4.17.3(o);
2) Place travel controls in neutral and set the parking brake when an
employee is elevated
on the platform as required by ANSI/ITSDF B56.1-2005, Section 4.17.3 (g);
3) Maneuver the platform slowly, only for minor adjustments in horizontal
positions
when personnel are on the platform as required by ANSI/ITSDF B56.1-2005,
Section
4.17.3(l);
4) Ensure all information is prominently indicated on the platform as
required by
ANSI/ITSDF B56.1-2005, Section 7.37.3(i).
Recent events (2)
  • · F (S) $5000.00
  • · Z (S) $5000.00

5(a)(1)

Deleted Serious Gravity 03 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 3, 2007
Abate by
Apr 20, 2007
Penalty
Initial $2,125 · Current $2,125
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish
employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized
hazards that were
causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in
that employees were
exposed to the hazard of falling from an elevation:
On or about October 16, 2006, and at times prior and after thereto,
employees were
exposed to the hazards of falling approximately 28 feet to the level below
when exiting
and reentering the personnel platform attached to the Nissan forklift,
Serial No. 9C2206
while attempting to free jammed pallets.
Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to
correct this
hazard is to use a piece of equipment designed to lift personnel to
another platform or
level equipped with a gate or door for safely entering and exiting as
required by
ANSI/ITSDF B56.1-2005,  Sections 4.17.3(p) & (r) which prohibits using a
platform
attached to a forklift for entering and exiting except at ground level,
and requires
personnel to remain on the platform while in the basket.
Recent events (2)
  • · F (S) $2125.00
  • · Z (S) $2125.00

1910.178 P01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Apr 3, 2007
Abate by
Apr 20, 2007
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • · F (S) $1000.00
  • · Z (S) $5000.00

1910.184 E09 I

Other-than-serious Gravity 03 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 3, 2007
Abate by
Apr 13, 2007
Penalty
Initial $2,500 · Current $500 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • · F (O) $500.00
  • · Z (S) $2500.00

1910.178 A06

Deleted Other-than-serious Gravity 01 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Apr 3, 2007
Abate by
Apr 20, 2007
Recent events (2)
  • · F (O)
  • · Z (O)

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 310355664.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.