OSHA Inspection: J.C. WELDING & REMODELING, LLC

Issued

Mar 24, 2008

Abate by

Apr 17, 2008

Penalty

Initial $750 · Current $438 Reduced

General-duty citation text

Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not
furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards that
were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees in that employees
were exposed to struck-by hazards, while operating a wheeled mobile crane:
On or about 02/08/08 at McDonough, GA: Employees were exposed to struck-by
hazards, while
performing work with a wheel mounted mobile crane. The following hazards
were identified
during the inspection of the mobile crane's hook:
1. The employer did not perform frequent and regular inspections on the
mobile crane's hook,
which was used in the lifting process.
2. The mobile crane's hook did not have a safety latch installed.
AMONG OTHER METHODS, ONE FEASIBLE AND ACCEPTABLE ABATEMENT
METHOD TO CORRECT THIS HAZARD IS:
1. The employer shall ensure that frequent and regular inspections are
performed on the wheeled
mobile crane's hook. ANSI B30.10-1993, Paragraph 10-1.2.1.1, states that
hooks in "normal"
service should be inspected monthly and receive a yearly documented
inspection. Pre-operational
inspections of the hook should also be performed.
2. The employer shall ensure that hooks are equipped with a safety latch
that closes the throat
opening.  Defective hooks shall be removed from service until the latch is
replaced or repaired.
Reference: ANSI B30.10-1993, Paragraph 10-1.2.3(d)
In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required
for this violation
(using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).

Issued

Mar 24, 2008

Abate by

Apr 17, 2008

Penalty

Initial $750 · Current $438 Reduced

General-duty citation text

Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not
furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards that
were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees
in that employees
were exposed to struck-by hazards, while operating a wheeled mobile crane:
On or about 02/08/08 at McDonough, GA: Employees were exposed to struck by
hazards, while
performing work with a wheel mounted mobile crane. An inspection of the
crane identified the
following hazards:
1. The wheel mounted mobile crane had a telescopic boom, which did not
have an anti
two-block device installed.
2. The crane's outriggers were deployed during a lift sequence. The
outriggers' pads
were deployed directly onto an unstable muddy surface.
AMONG OTHER METHODS, ONE FEASIBLE AND ACCEPTABLE ABATEMENT
METHOD TO CORRECT THIS HAZARD IS:
1. The employer should ensure that an anti two-block device is installed
on the boom of
the crane to prevent contact between the hook assembly and the boom point
sheave
assembly.
Reference: ANSI B30.5-1994, Paragraph 5-1.9.9(a)
2. Where firm footing is not supplied, timbers, cribbing or other
structural members
should be provided to distribute the crane's load. ANSI B30.5, Paragraph
5-3.4.6.
In accordance with 29 CFR 1903.19(c), abatement certification is required
for these
violations (using the CERTIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKSHEET).

Issued

Mar 24, 2008

Abate by

Apr 17, 2008

Penalty

Initial $750 · Current $438 Reduced

Issued

Mar 24, 2008

Abate by

Apr 17, 2008

Issued

Mar 24, 2008

Abate by

Apr 17, 2008

Penalty

Initial $750 · Current $438 Reduced