NORTH MONMOUTH, ME —
OSHA Inspection: TEX TECH INDUSTRIES, INC.
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of TEX TECH INDUSTRIES, INC. in 105 NORTH MAIN STREET, NORTH MONMOUTH, ME 04265 (NAICS 313210). OSHA activity number 311124978.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- TEX TECH INDUSTRIES, INC.
- Site address
- 105 NORTH MAIN STREET
- City
- NORTH MONMOUTH
- State
- ME
- ZIP
- 04265
- Mailing
- P. O. BOX 8, NORTH MONMOUTH, ME 04265
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 313210
- SIC code (legacy)
- 2221
- Employees
- 200
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
25 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2007
- Abate by
- Oct 2, 2007
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $3,675 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to avulsion hazards in that the employer did not comply with the mandatory language in accordance with ANSI L1.1-1972; Safety Requirements For The Textile Industry - Section 8.5 Conveyors: Blending Dept., 1A Blender - The two wall mounted emergency stops to the blender with two internal conveyors, one moved the flock to the spike apron with 3/4" long spikes, which in turn conveyed the flock onto a table and eventually into the baler were not adequate in that they were not readily accessible for cleaning the spike apron and underneath the area. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method to correct the following hazard is to install an emergency stop cable around the blender at a feasible height.
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $3675.00
- — Z (S) $4900.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2007
- Abate by
- Oct 2, 2007
- Penalty
- Initial $1,100 · Current $825 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to crushed by or struck-by hazards: In the following instances, the rated load of the lifting devices was not legibly marked on the main structure or on a tag attached to it where it is visible in accordance to ASME B30.20 -Below the Hook Lifting Devices, Chapter 20-1: Structural and Mechanical Lifting Devices: a)Needling Dept., Needle Line #1 - An in-house fabricated lifting device, used for the 210 pound backing material rolls, did not have a legible mark or tag attached to the structure indicating its load rating. b)Needling Dept., Loom #13 - An in-house fabricated lifting device, used for rolls of various fabrics from the loom, did not have a legible mark or tag attached to the structure indicating its load rating. c)Needling Dept., Loom #17 - An in-house fabricated lifting device, used for rolls of various fabrics from the loom, did not have a legible mark or tag attached to the structure indicating its load rating. d)Final Inspection, Perch #1 - An in-house fabricated lifting device, used for rolls of various fabrics from the perch, did not have a legible mark or tag attached to the structure indicating its load rating. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to have a qualified person evaluate the in-house fabricated lifting devices in order to determine the appropriate calculations for legibly marking or tagging the proper load rating.
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $825.00
- — Z (S) $1100.00
1910.184 E01
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2007
- Abate by
- Sep 24, 2007
Recent events (2)
- — F (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.184 E03 II
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2007
- Abate by
- Sep 24, 2007
Recent events (2)
- — F (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.184 I01
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2007
- Abate by
- Sep 24, 2007
Recent events (2)
- — F (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.184 I09 IV
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2007
- Abate by
- Sep 24, 2007
Recent events (2)
- — F (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.23 C01
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2007
- Abate by
- Sep 27, 2007
- Penalty
- Initial $1,375 · Current $1,032 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $1032.00
- — Z (S) $1375.00
1910.151 C
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2007
- Abate by
- Sep 24, 2007
- Penalty
- Initial $1,100 · Current $825 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $825.00
- — Z (S) $1100.00
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2007
- Abate by
- Oct 2, 2007
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $3,670 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $3670.00
- — Z (S) $4900.00
1910.215 B09
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2007
- Abate by
- Sep 24, 2007
- Penalty
- Initial $825 · Current $619 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $619.00
- — Z (S) $825.00
1910.219 C02 I
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2007
- Abate by
- Sep 27, 2007
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $2,625 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $2625.00
- — Z (S) $3500.00
1910.219 C04 I
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2007
- Abate by
- Oct 2, 2007
Recent events (2)
- — F (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.219 C04 II
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2007
- Abate by
- Sep 25, 2007
Recent events (2)
- — F (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.219 D01
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2007
- Abate by
- Sep 25, 2007
- Penalty
- Initial $1,375 · Current $1,032 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $1032.00
- — Z (S) $1375.00
1910.219 E03 I
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2007
- Abate by
- Sep 25, 2007
Recent events (2)
- — F (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.303 B02
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2007
- Abate by
- Sep 25, 2007
- Penalty
- Initial $1,375 · Current $1,032 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $1032.00
- — Z (S) $1375.00
1910.303 F
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2007
- Abate by
- Sep 25, 2007
- Penalty
- Initial $1,375 · Current $1,032 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $1032.00
- — Z (S) $1375.00
1910.303 G01 II
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2007
- Abate by
- Sep 25, 2007
- Penalty
- Initial $1,375 · Current $1,032 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $1032.00
- — Z (S) $1375.00
1910.304 A02
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2007
- Abate by
- Sep 24, 2007
- Penalty
- Initial $1,375 · Current $1,032 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $1032.00
- — Z (S) $1375.00
1910.304 F04
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2007
- Abate by
- Sep 27, 2007
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $2,625 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $2625.00
- — Z (S) $3500.00
1910.134 C02 II
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2007
- Abate by
- Sep 24, 2007
Recent events (2)
- — F (O)
- — Z (O)
1910.157 E02
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2007
- Abate by
- Sep 25, 2007
Recent events (2)
- — F (O)
- — Z (O)
1910.178 A05
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2007
- Abate by
- Oct 2, 2007
Recent events (2)
- — F (O)
- — Z (O)
1910.303 B02
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2007
- Abate by
- Sep 25, 2007
Recent events (2)
- — F (O)
- — Z (O)
1910.335 B01
- Issued
- Sep 19, 2007
- Abate by
- Sep 25, 2007
Recent events (2)
- — F (O)
- — Z (O)
More inspections at TEX Tech Industries, INC.
View TEX Tech Industries, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 313210)
More inspections in ME
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 311124978.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.