Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,124Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-25 Last loaded 2026-08-28

OSHA Inspection: CONCO INDUSTRIAL SERVICES

Programmed Related inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a programmed Related safety inspection of CONCO INDUSTRIAL SERVICES in 401 SOUTH 23RD STREET, BILLINGS, MT 59101 (NAICS 238990). OSHA activity number 311218531.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Conco Industrial Services for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Conco Industrial Services is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
401 SOUTH 23RD STREET
City
BILLINGS
State
MT
ZIP
59101
Mailing
818 W 13TH, DEER PARK, TX 77536
Inspection type
Programmed Related (I)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (N)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238990
SIC code (legacy)
1799
Employees
3
Ownership type
Private (A)

1 citation on file for this inspection.

1910.119 H03 II

Serious Gravity 03 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Jun 25, 2009
Abate by
Jul 3, 2009
Penalty
Initial $875 · Current $400 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(h)(3)(ii):  The contract employer did not assure that each
employee was
instructed in the applicable provisions of the emergency action plan:
a.  On or about April 8, 2009 and at times prior Conco did not ensure that
employees
were protected from explosion/fire/chemical exposure hazards.  The
employees were
not properly instructed concerning provisions of CFR 1910.38 Emergency
Action
Plans.
1.  CFR 1910.38(c)(2):  Calls for types of evacuations and exit route
assignments.  The employees were not given clear instructions on types of
evacuations and specific techniques (wind direction and strength) to be
used in
making a safe escape.  They were also not given a clear exit route when
moved around the plant
2.  CFR 1910.38(d):  Calls for a distinctive signal for each purpose.  The
employees did not know how many signals or what each distinctive alarm
meant.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $400.00
  • · Z (S) $875.00

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 311218531.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.