FAYETTEVILLE, AR —
OSHA Inspection: ROOFING SYSTEMS, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of ROOFING SYSTEMS, INC. in MILSAP ROAD - ADJACENT TO SLEEP INN PARKING AREA, FAYETTEVILLE, AR 72703 (NAICS 238160). OSHA activity number 311364699.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ROOFING SYSTEMS, INC.
- Site address
- MILSAP ROAD - ADJACENT TO SLEEP INN PARKING AREA
- City
- FAYETTEVILLE
- State
- AR
- ZIP
- 72703
- Mailing
- 649 W. COUNTY ROAD, SPRINGDALE, AR 72764
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238160
- SIC code (legacy)
- 1761
- Employees
- 18
- Ownership type
- A
- Industry flags
- Construction safety.
Citations
3 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Oct 7, 2008
- Abate by
- Nov 3, 2008
- Penalty
- Initial $750 · Current $750
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that an employee was exposed to falls from elevations in the following instances: On or about May 22, 2008 at the jobsite located adjacent to Sleep Inn in Fayetteville, Arkansas and at times thereto: [A] An employee was observed to be exposed to fall hazards, while working from and as a passenger on a personnel platform being lifted by a SkyTrak 6034-2, S/N 2M0058 Telescopic Handler rough terrain forklift truck. The employee was working approximately 16 feet above the level below without the benefit of a fall protection system. Among other methods, feasible and acceptable means of abatement to correct this hazard are: (1) Provide employees working from elevated platforms with personal fall protection and (2) Comply with ANSI B56.6- 2005 Section 5.15.1, "Safety Standard for Rough Terrain Forklift Trucks Requirements for Personnel Platforms" In accordance, with this standard employees are required to use a full body harness and lanyard anchored to the personnel platform. [B] An employee was exposed to a potential fall or tipping hazard when working from a platform due to the excessive width of the platform. Additionally, the extension of the platform past the width of the truck created a potential for a springboard action, whereby, employees not wearing fall protection could be ejected out of the elevated platform. The width of the platform was 144 inches at the time of this exposure and the width of the forklift wheel base was 95.375 inches, thus limiting the maximum width of the platform to 105.375 inches. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to comply with the requirements set forth in ASME B56.6-2002, Section 8.24, "Platforms for Elevating Personnel" which states: Floor dimensions which shall not exceed two times the load center distance listed on the rough terrain forklift truck nameplate, measured parallel to the longitudinal center plane of the truck, nor have a width greater than the overall width of the truck (measured across the load bearing tires) plus 10 in.(250 mm) on either side. Minimum space for each person on the platform shall not be less than 18 in. (450 mm) in either direction. [C] Employees were exposed to being struck by hydraulic fluid under high pressure due to the poor condition of the lines caused by dry-rotting from age and abrasion damage. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to comply with the requirements set forth in SkyTrak Telescopic Handlers Operation and Maintenance Manual, American National Standard, ANSI/ITSDF B56.6-2005, and Safety Standard for Rough Terrain Forklift Trucks and the Rough Terrain Forklift, Safety Manual for Operating and Maintenance Personnel, Association of Equipment Manufacturer's (AEM). Abatement Disclaimers: 1. The employer is not limited to the abatement methods above. 2. The recommended abatement methods may not be effective in all circumstances. 3. The employer is responsible for selecting an appropriate abatement method. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION AND DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED FOR THIS ITEM IN ACCORDANCE WITH 29 CFR 1903.19(c) AND 29 CFR 1903.19(d)
1926.451 C02 IV
- Issued
- Oct 7, 2008
- Abate by
- Oct 7, 2008
1926.451 C02 V
- Issued
- Oct 7, 2008
- Abate by
- Oct 7, 2008
More inspections at Roofing Systems, INC.
View Roofing Systems, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238160)
More inspections in AR
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 311364699.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.