LITTLE ROCK, AR —
OSHA Inspection: JAJAK ERECTORS, INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of JAJAK ERECTORS, INC. in 1000 BOWMAN ROAD, LITTLE ROCK, AR 72211 (NAICS 238120). OSHA activity number 311364939.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- JAJAK ERECTORS, INC.
- Site address
- 1000 BOWMAN ROAD
- City
- LITTLE ROCK
- State
- AR
- ZIP
- 72211
- Mailing
- 4856 SOUTH STATE HIGHWAY FF, BATTLEFIED, MO 65619
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238120
- SIC code (legacy)
- 1791
- Employees
- 10
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jun 19, 2008
- Abate by
- Jul 1, 2008
- Penalty
- Initial $750 · Current $750
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: At the worksite, at or near 1000 Bowman Road, Little Rock, Arkansas 72211, employees were working from an elevated scaffold platform attached to a rough terrain powered industrial truck (forklift). The platform extended approximately sixty (60) inches past the width of the truck. Per standards established by The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME/ANSI) in part B56.6-1992 (Safety Standard for Rough Terrain Forklift Trucks), paragraph 8.25.1(b) (Platforms for Elevating Personnel), platforms shall not extend more than 10 inches (250 mm) past the overall width of the truck. The ASME/ANSI standard states in part, "floor dimensions which shall not exceed two times the load center distance listed on the rough terrain forklift truck nameplate, measured parallel to the longitudinal center plane of the truck, nor have a width greater than the overall width of the truck [measured across the load bearing tires plus 10 inches (250 mm) on either side]." The work platform was examined and found to have damage to the welds around the fork mounting brackets. Additionally, the platform floor structure was warped, that is, the ends of the platform were deflected downward from the center where attached to the forks of the powered industrial truck. Two employees worked from the ends of the platform performing job activities such as but not limited to hanging insulation and attaching siding. The employees were working from inside and outside the platform without the use of fall protection. Additionally, the extension of the platform past the width of the truck created a potential for a springboarding action, whereby, employees not wearing fall protection can be ejected out of the elevated scaffold platform. These conditions existed on or about May 6, 2008 and times thereto and exposed employees to the hazard of falling from an elevation. Feasible abatement methods include but are not limited to: 1. Providing a platform designed and/or approved by the forklift manufacturer. 2. Using other means to conduct the job activities. Abatement Disclaimers: 1. The employer is not limited to the abatement methods above. 2. The recommended abatement methods may not be effective in all circumstances. 3. The employer is responsible for selecting an appropriate abatement method.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $750.00
- — Z (S) $750.00
1926.451 G01
- Issued
- Jun 19, 2008
- Abate by
- Jun 25, 2008
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $700 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $700.00
- — Z (S) $1500.00
1926.602 C01 II
- Issued
- Jun 19, 2008
- Abate by
- Jun 24, 2008
- Penalty
- Initial $750 · Current $750
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $750.00
- — Z (S) $750.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jun 19, 2008
- Abate by
- Jul 1, 2008
- Penalty
- Initial $750 · Current $300 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: At the worksite, at or near 1000 Bowman Road, Little Rock, Arkansas 72211, employees were working from an elevated scaffold platform attached to a rough terrain powered industrial truck (forklift). The platform extended approximately sixty (60) inches past the width of the truck. Per standards established by The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME/ANSI) in part B56.6-1992 (Safety Standard for Rough Terrain Forklift Trucks), paragraph 8.25.1(b) (Platforms for Elevating Personnel), platforms shall not extend more than 10 inches (250 mm) past the overall width of the truck. The ASME/ANSI standard states in part, "floor dimensions which shall not exceed two times the load center distance listed on the rough terrain forklift truck nameplate, measured parallel to the longitudinal center plane of the truck, nor have a width greater than the overall width of the truck [measured across the load bearing tires plus 10 inches (250 mm) on either side]." The work platform was examined and found to have damage to the welds around the fork mounting brackets. Additionally, the platform floor structure was warped, that is, the ends of the platform were deflected downward from the center where attached to the forks of the powered industrial truck. Two employees worked from the ends of the platform performing job activities such as but not limited to hanging insulation and attaching siding. The employees were working from inside and outside the platform without the use of fall protection. Additionally, the extension of the platform past the width of the truck created a potential for a springboarding action, whereby, employees not wearing fall protection can be ejected out of the elevated scaffold platform. These conditions existed on or about May 6, 2008 and times thereto and exposed employees to the hazard of falling from an elevation. Feasible abatement methods include but are not limited to: 1. Providing a platform designed and/or approved by the forklift manufacturer. 2. Using other means to conduct the job activities. Abatement Disclaimers: 1. The employer is not limited to the abatement methods above. 2. The recommended abatement methods may not be effective in all circumstances. 3. The employer is responsible for selecting an appropriate abatement method.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $300.00
- — Z (S) $750.00
1926.602 C01 II
- Issued
- Jun 19, 2008
- Abate by
- Jun 24, 2008
- Penalty
- Initial $750
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S) $750.00
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238120)
More inspections in AR
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 311364939.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.