Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: C.G. ENTERPRISES INC.

Unprogrammed Related inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related safety inspection of C.G. ENTERPRISES INC. in 1919 S. MARINA DRIVE, MILWAUKEE, WI 53207 (NAICS 238990). OSHA activity number 311401939.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch C.G. Enterprises INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for C.G. Enterprises INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1919 S. MARINA DRIVE
City
MILWAUKEE
State
WI
ZIP
53207
Mailing
1112 MARSHALL AVE., SOUTH MILWAUKEE, WI 53172
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Related (G)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
N
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238990
SIC code (legacy)
1799
Employees
2
Ownership type
A

7 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 4, 2009
Abate by
May 17, 2009
Penalty
Initial $1,500 · Current $1,500
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish
employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized
hazards that were
causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in
that employees were
exposed to struck-by and crushing hazards from a mobile crane being used:
(a)On or about November 17, 2008, employee(s) were exposed to struck-by and
crushing hazards in that the employer did not ensure the area in which the
crane
was to be set up for lifting boats out of the water was suitable and
properly
prepared.  Consideration of the surface, support capabilities and
subsurface
construction of the area in which the DEMAG AC 265, 120 ton mobile crane
was
set up was inadequate, in that the right rear outrigger pad was positioned
directly
adjacent to the sheet pile river seawall.
One feasible means of abatement would be to comply with the American
Society of Mechanical
Engineers, ASME B30.5 - 2007 Safety Standard for Mobile and Locomotive
Cranes, Section
5-3.
Certification, and documentation/evidence of abatement is required.
Certification of abatement is required by 29 CFR Part 1903 and is to be
submitted within ten (10)
calendar days after the abatement date.ment
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1500.00
  • — Z (S) $1500.00

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 4, 2009
Abate by
May 8, 2009
Penalty
Initial $1,500 · Current $750 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish
employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized
hazards that were
causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in
that: employees were
exposed to being struck by load and or the lifting device, because the
crane lifting device was
not load tested and rated prior to initial use.
(a) The below-the-hook lifting device (Spreader Beam Assembly) used to rig
the 46,000
to 54,000 pound boats for lifting out of the water, did not have the rated
load visibly
marked on it or identification affixed listing the manufacturers name and
address,
serial
number and lifting device weight. This exposed the crane operator, rigger
and other
employees assisting in the lift to a struck by and crushing hazard,
in-that the lifting
capacity of the lifting device is unknown and can be exceeded, causing
failure to occur
and the load being dropped.
(b) The lifting device (Spreader Beam Assembly) used to rig the 46,000 -
54,000 pound
boats for lifting out of the water, was not load tested prior to initial
use. This exposed
employees to a struck by and crushing hazard from a falling load, in-that
the lifting
capacity of the lifting device is unknown and can be exceeded causing
failure to occur
during lifting operations.
One feasible means of abatement would be to comply with American Society of
Mechanical Engineers (ASME) B30.20-1999 Below-The-Hook Lifting Devices,
section
20-1.4.2 Markings, which requires the marking of the rated load capacity
on
all lifting
devices, and section 20-1.4.2 Rated Load Test, that requires a rated load
test on all
lifting devices prior to initial use.
Certification, and documentation/evidence of abatement is required.
Certification of abatement is required by 29 CFR Part 1903 and is to be
submitted within ten (10)
calendar days after the abatement date.ment
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $750.00
  • — Z (S) $1500.00

1910.180 H03 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 4, 2009
Abate by
May 17, 2009
Penalty
Initial $1,500 · Current $1,500
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1500.00
  • — Z (S) $1500.00

1910.180 H03 IXC

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 4, 2009
Abate by
May 17, 2009
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S)
  • — Z (S)

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 4, 2009
Abate by
May 17, 2009
Penalty
Initial $1,500 · Current $750 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish
employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized
hazards that were
causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in
that employees were
exposed to struck-by and crushing hazards from a mobile crane being used:
(a)On or about November 17, 2008, employee(s) were exposed to struck-by and
crushing hazards in that the employer did not ensure the area in which the
crane
was to be set up for lifting boats out of the water was suitable and
properly
prepared.  Consideration of the surface, support capabilities and
subsurface
construction of the area in which the DEMAG AC 265, 120 ton mobile crane
was
set up was inadequate, in that the right rear outrigger pad was positioned
directly
adjacent to the sheet pile river seawall.
One feasible means of abatement would be to comply with the American
Society of Mechanical
Engineers, ASME B30.5 - 2007 Safety Standard for Mobile and Locomotive
Cranes, Section
5-3.
Certification, and documentation/evidence of abatement is required.
Certification of abatement is required by 29 CFR Part 1903 and is to be
submitted within ten (10)
calendar days after the abatement date.ment
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $750.00
  • — Z (S) $1500.00

1910.180 H03 I

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 4, 2009
Abate by
May 17, 2009
Penalty
Initial $1,500
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S)
  • — Z (S) $1500.00

1910.180 H03 IXC

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
May 4, 2009
Abate by
May 17, 2009
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S)
  • — Z (S)

View C.G. Enterprises INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 311401939.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.