MILWAUKEE, WI —
OSHA Inspection: C.G. ENTERPRISES INC.
Unprogrammed Related inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related safety inspection of C.G. ENTERPRISES INC. in 1919 S. MARINA DRIVE, MILWAUKEE, WI 53207 (NAICS 238990). OSHA activity number 311401939.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- C.G. ENTERPRISES INC.
- Site address
- 1919 S. MARINA DRIVE
- City
- MILWAUKEE
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53207
- Mailing
- 1112 MARSHALL AVE., SOUTH MILWAUKEE, WI 53172
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Unprogrammed Related (G)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238990
- SIC code (legacy)
- 1799
- Employees
- 2
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- May 4, 2009
- Abate by
- May 17, 2009
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $1,500
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to struck-by and crushing hazards from a mobile crane being used: (a)On or about November 17, 2008, employee(s) were exposed to struck-by and crushing hazards in that the employer did not ensure the area in which the crane was to be set up for lifting boats out of the water was suitable and properly prepared. Consideration of the surface, support capabilities and subsurface construction of the area in which the DEMAG AC 265, 120 ton mobile crane was set up was inadequate, in that the right rear outrigger pad was positioned directly adjacent to the sheet pile river seawall. One feasible means of abatement would be to comply with the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, ASME B30.5 - 2007 Safety Standard for Mobile and Locomotive Cranes, Section 5-3. Certification, and documentation/evidence of abatement is required. Certification of abatement is required by 29 CFR Part 1903 and is to be submitted within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date.ment
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1500.00
- — Z (S) $1500.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- May 4, 2009
- Abate by
- May 8, 2009
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $750 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that: employees were exposed to being struck by load and or the lifting device, because the crane lifting device was not load tested and rated prior to initial use. (a) The below-the-hook lifting device (Spreader Beam Assembly) used to rig the 46,000 to 54,000 pound boats for lifting out of the water, did not have the rated load visibly marked on it or identification affixed listing the manufacturers name and address, serial number and lifting device weight. This exposed the crane operator, rigger and other employees assisting in the lift to a struck by and crushing hazard, in-that the lifting capacity of the lifting device is unknown and can be exceeded, causing failure to occur and the load being dropped. (b) The lifting device (Spreader Beam Assembly) used to rig the 46,000 - 54,000 pound boats for lifting out of the water, was not load tested prior to initial use. This exposed employees to a struck by and crushing hazard from a falling load, in-that the lifting capacity of the lifting device is unknown and can be exceeded causing failure to occur during lifting operations. One feasible means of abatement would be to comply with American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) B30.20-1999 Below-The-Hook Lifting Devices, section 20-1.4.2 Markings, which requires the marking of the rated load capacity on all lifting devices, and section 20-1.4.2 Rated Load Test, that requires a rated load test on all lifting devices prior to initial use. Certification, and documentation/evidence of abatement is required. Certification of abatement is required by 29 CFR Part 1903 and is to be submitted within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date.ment
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $750.00
- — Z (S) $1500.00
1910.180 H03 I
- Issued
- May 4, 2009
- Abate by
- May 17, 2009
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $1,500
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1500.00
- — Z (S) $1500.00
1910.180 H03 IXC
- Issued
- May 4, 2009
- Abate by
- May 17, 2009
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- May 4, 2009
- Abate by
- May 17, 2009
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $750 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to struck-by and crushing hazards from a mobile crane being used: (a)On or about November 17, 2008, employee(s) were exposed to struck-by and crushing hazards in that the employer did not ensure the area in which the crane was to be set up for lifting boats out of the water was suitable and properly prepared. Consideration of the surface, support capabilities and subsurface construction of the area in which the DEMAG AC 265, 120 ton mobile crane was set up was inadequate, in that the right rear outrigger pad was positioned directly adjacent to the sheet pile river seawall. One feasible means of abatement would be to comply with the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, ASME B30.5 - 2007 Safety Standard for Mobile and Locomotive Cranes, Section 5-3. Certification, and documentation/evidence of abatement is required. Certification of abatement is required by 29 CFR Part 1903 and is to be submitted within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date.ment
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $750.00
- — Z (S) $1500.00
1910.180 H03 I
- Issued
- May 4, 2009
- Abate by
- May 17, 2009
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S) $1500.00
1910.180 H03 IXC
- Issued
- May 4, 2009
- Abate by
- May 17, 2009
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
More inspections at C.G. Enterprises INC.
View C.G. Enterprises INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238990)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 311401939.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.