HOLLAND, MO —
OSHA Inspection: L. BERRY GIN COMPANY INC.
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of L. BERRY GIN COMPANY INC. in 175 W. 4TH STREET, HOLLAND, MO 63853 (NAICS 115111). OSHA activity number 311426605.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- L. BERRY GIN COMPANY INC.
- Site address
- 175 W. 4TH STREET
- City
- HOLLAND
- State
- MO
- ZIP
- 63853
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX B, HOLLAND, MO 63853
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 115111
- SIC code (legacy)
- 0724
- Employees
- 30
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
7 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $700.00 · Current $350.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the hazards of being struck by fragments from an abrasive wheel that lacked a work rest: a/ At the work shop, employees were exposed to a struck-by hazard when operating a bench, mounted, abrasive wheel grinder (no model or serial number visible) without a work rest attached. One method of abatement to correct this apparent hazard is to install a work rest as required by ANSI B7.1-1988, paragraph 9.14. DISCLAIMER: a) The employer is not limited to the abatement method(s) suggested by OSHA. b) The employer is responsible for selecting and implementing an effective abatement method. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION AND ABATEMENT VERIFICATION ARE REQUIRED FOR THIS VIOLATION.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $350.00
- — Z (S) $700.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Abate by
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the hazards of being struck by abrasive wheel fragments from an abrasive wheel that lacked a tongue guard: a/ At the work shop, employees were exposed to a struck-by hazard when operating a bench, mounted, abrasive wheel grinder (no model or serial number visible) without a tongue guard attached. One method of abatement to correct this apparent hazard is to install a peripheral guard as required by ANSI B7.1-1988, paragraph 4.3.1.1. DISCLAIMER: a) The employer is not limited to the abatement method(s) suggested by OSHA. b) The employer is responsible for selecting and implementing an effective abatement method. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION AND ABATEMENT VERIFICATION ARE REQUIRED FOR THIS VIOLATION.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $875.00 · Current $438.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the potential hazards of being inside a permit-confined space without a hazard identification or evaluation being performed: a/ At the cotton gin, employees enter the feeder and press pits to conduct cleaning, servicing, and maintenance as required. Each covered pit is entered by climbing down a fixed ladder approximately 12 feet in height. The dimensions of these pits beneath the floor above are approximately 12'D X 20'W X 30'L. The means, procedures, and practices necessary for safe permit space entry operations, to include the testing of the internal atmospheric conditions of the space, the elimination of associated mechanical hazards, and the preparation of entry permits were not developed and implemented. One method of abatement to correct this apparent hazard is to develop and implement the means, procedures, and practices necessary for safe permit space entry operations as required by ANSI Z117.1-2003, paragraphs 3.2 and 3.3. DISCLAIMER: a) The employer is not limited to the abatement method(s) suggested by OSHA. b) The employer is responsible for selecting and implementing an effective abatement method. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION AND ABATEMENT VERIFICATION ARE REQUIRED FOR THIS VIOLATION.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $437.50
- — Z (S) $875.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $875.00 · Current $438.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing of likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the hazards of unsafe rescue after the entrant entered a permit-required confined space: a/ At the gin, an emergency response plan for rescuing the entrant inside of a permit- required confined space had not been developed. One method of abatement to correct this apparent hazard is to develop an emergency response plan then equip and train the responders as necessary for safe rescue as required by ANSI Z117.1-2003, paragraph 14. DISCLAIMER: a) The employer is not limited to the abatement method(s) suggested by OSHA. b) The employer is responsible for selecting and implementing an effective abatement method. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION AND ABATEMENT VERIFICATION ARE REQUIRED FOR THIS VIOLATION.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $437.50
- — Z (S) $875.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $875.00 · Current $438.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the hazards of being caught-by machinery due to the lack of specific lockout/tagout procedures: a/ At the gin, the employer failed to develop specific lockout/tagout procedures for machinery such as the Continental Gin 9300 Press Pumps. These systems utilize a combination of 480-volts, hydraulics, and gravity. One method of abatement to correct this apparent hazard is to develop and implement specific lockout/tagout procedures as required by ANSI 244.1-2003, paragraph 5.3.1.1. DISCLAIMER: a) The employer is not limited to the abatement method(s) suggested by OSHA. b) The employer is responsible for selecting and implementing an effective abatement method. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION AND ABATEMENT VERIFICATION ARE REQUIRED FOR THIS VIOLATION.ON
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $437.50
- — Z (S) $875.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $700.00 · Current $350.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the hazards of electric shock: a/ At the gin, the cord and plug belonging to the 110-volt Tarp Roller was positioned in a water puddle. This machine was used by employees as necessary to roll up tarps. One method of abatement to correct this apparent hazard is to remove the plug and socket from the water on the floor as required by NFPA 70-2002, section 110.2(A). DISCLAIMER a) The employer is not limited to the abatement method(s) suggested by OSHA. b) The employer is responsible for selecting and implementing an effective abatement method.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $350.00
- — Z (S) $700.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Abate by
- Penalty
- Initial $700.00 · Current $350.00 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the hazards of electric shock: a/ At the gin, the outer insulation belonging to a flexible cord that supplied 110-volt electrical power to a Tarp Roller was damaged. One method of abatement to correct this apparent hazard is to repair or replace the damaged flexible cord as required by NFPA 70E-2000, Part 2, Chapter 4, Section 4-3.2.2. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION AND ABATEMENT VERIFICATION ARE REQUIRED FOR THIS VIOLATION.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $350.00
- — Z (S) $700.00
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 115111)
SURRENCY, GA—2026-06-23 00:00:00
SOUTHEASTERN GIN, INC.
LEMOORE, CA—2025-12-16 00:00:00
WEST ISLAND COTTON GROWERS, INC.
SLATON, TX—2025-12-15 00:00:00
WESTEX COOPERATIVE GIN
SLATON, TX—2025-11-28 00:00:00
WESTEX COOPERATIVE GIN
LAMESA, TX—2025-11-12 00:00:00
UNITED GIN CORPORATION
More inspections in MO
SAINT LOUIS, MO—2026-07-17 00:00:00
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
PLATTE CITY, MO—2026-07-15 00:00:00
TRIPLE J CONSTRUCTION, LLC.
CLINTON, MO—2026-07-14 00:00:00
TORCHYLO BUILDERS, LLC.
BLUE SPRINGS, MO—2026-07-13 00:00:00
JORGE MERIDA
KANSAS CITY, MO—2026-07-09 00:00:00
NIAGARA BOTTLING
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 311426605.