Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,196,991Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-24 Last loaded 2026-08-27

OSHA Inspection: D. G. & G. INC.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of D. G. & G. INC. in 7055 STATE HWY 153, PARMA, MO 63870 (NAICS 115111). OSHA activity number 311426662.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch D. G. & G. INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for D. G. & G. INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
D. G. & G. INC.
Site address
7055 STATE HWY 153
City
PARMA
State
MO
ZIP
63870
Mailing
P.O. BOX 696, SIKESTON, MO 63801
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (N)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
115111
SIC code (legacy)
0724
Employees
52
Ownership type
Private (A)

4 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 02 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2007
Abate by
Jan 22, 2008
Penalty
Initial $700 · Current $420 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not furnish employment
and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that
were causing or likely to cause
death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed
to potentially hazardous
atmospheres and mechanical hazards when entering a confined space(s):
a/  At the gin, the employer failed to perform a hazard evaluation of the
covered pit below the PHX Press
prior to authorizing employees to enter it for the purpose of performing
cleaning of the space and servicing of
the machinery.
One method of abatement to correct this apparent hazard is to perform the
required hazard evaluation of the
space by a qualified person and document the findings in an entry permit
as required by ANSI Z117.1-2003,
paragraph 3.3.
DISCLAIMER:
a)  The employer is not limited to the abatement method(s) suggested by
OSHA.
b)  The employer is responsible for selecting and implementing an
effective abatement method.
ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION AND ABATEMENT VERIFICATION ARE REQUIRED FOR THIS
VIOLATION.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $420.00
  • · Z (S) $700.00

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 02 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2007
Abate by
Jan 22, 2008
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not furnish employment
and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that
were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to
the hazards of an inadequate
emergency response plan:
a/  At the gin, the employer failed to develop an emergency rescue plan,
specifically for vertical rescue, for
employees who descend down into the covered pit directly below the PHX
Press to perform cleaning and
servicing of the machinery.
One method of abatement to correct this apparent hazard is to develop and
implement an emergency plan with
special emphasis on vertical rescue as required by ANSI Z117.1-2003,
paragraph
14.1.
DISCLAIMER:
a)  The employer is not limited to the abatement method(s) suggested by
OSHA.
b)  The employer is responsible for selecting and implementing an
effective abatement method.
ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION AND ABATEMENT VERIFICATION ARE REQUIRED FOR THIS
VIOLATION.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 02 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2007
Abate by
Jan 22, 2008
Penalty
Initial $700 · Current $420 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not furnish employment
and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that
were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to
the hazard of energized machinery:
a/  At the gin, the employer failed to develop specific energy control
procedures for machinery such as PHX
Press which uses a combination of 440-volts, hydraulics, and pneumatics to
operate.
One method of abatement to correct this apparent hazard is to develop
specific energy control procedures in
writing as required by ANSI Z244.1-2003, paragraph 5.3.1.1.
DISCLAIMER:
a)  The employer is not limited to the abatement method(s) suggested by
OSHA.
b)  The employer is responsible for selecting and implementing an
effective abatement method.
ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION AND ABATEMENT VERIFICATION ARE REQUIRED FOR THIS
VIOLATION.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $420.00
  • · Z (S) $700.00

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 02 4 instances 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 3, 2007
Abate by
Dec 6, 2007
Penalty
Initial $700 · Current $420 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not furnish employment
and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that
were causing or likely to cause death
or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to
the hazards of being struck-by
punctured compressed gas cylinders:
a/  At the tool room, three oxygen and one acetylene cylinders in storage
were not properly supported to
prevent them from being knocked over.
One method of abatement to correct this apparent hazard is to secure
compressed gas cylinders to prevent them
from falling as required by the Compressed Gas Association Pamphlet,
P-1-1965, section 3.4.4.
DISCLAIMER:
a)  The employer is not limited to the abatement method(s) suggested by
OSHA.
b)  The employer is responsible for selecting and implementing an
effective abatement method.nt
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $420.00
  • · Z (S) $700.00

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 311426662.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.