Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: SAUDER MANUFACTURING

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of SAUDER MANUFACTURING in 930 W. BARRE ROAD, ARCHBOLD, OH 43502 (NAICS 337127). OSHA activity number 311606248.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Sauder Manufacturing for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Sauder Manufacturing is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
930 W. BARRE ROAD
City
ARCHBOLD
State
OH
ZIP
43502
Mailing
P.O. BOX 230, ARCHBOLD, OH 43502
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (N)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
337127
SIC code (legacy)
2531
Employees
182
Ownership type
Private (A)

6 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 03 1 instance 182 exposed
Issued
Mar 6, 2009
Abate by
Oct 28, 2009
Penalty
Initial $1,875 · Current $1,400 Reduced

Hazardous substances M102

Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not
furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards
that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees, in that
employees were exposed to dust explosion, deflagration, or other fire
hazards because
methods were not utilized to ensure proper storage and prevent ignition of
combustible wood
dusts during storage:
(a)  Sauder Manufacturing Company, Archbold, Ohio:  On or about November
12, 2008, the
wood dust storage silo located outside of the north exterior wall was not
equipped with
deflagration relief venting.  The building and the employees working
therein were exposed to
a deflagration explosion hazard from wood dust in the storage silo.
Abatement Note:  Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable
abatement method to correct this hazard is to equip the storage silo with
deflagration relief venting in accordance with the National Fire Protection
Association (NFPA) 664-2007 Standard for the Prevention of Fires and
Explosions in Wood Processing and Woodworking Facilities section 8.10.3.2.
Abatement Schedule
Step 1 -A written detailed plan of abatement shall be submitted to the Area
Director outlining a schedule for the implementation of engineering
controls, instrumentation, and equipment to protect employees from fire
and deflagration hazards related to combustible dust as referenced in
this citation. This plan shall include, at a minimum, target dates for the
following actions which must be consistent with the abatement dates
required by this citation:
(1)  Evaluation of engineering control options;
(2)  Selection of optimum control methods and completion of design;
and
(3)  Procurement, installation and operation of selected control
measures;
All proposed control measures shall be approved for each particular use
by a person competent in fire and deflagration control of combustible
dusts.  At the conclusion of the 60-day period, the detailed plan for
abatement shall be submitted to the Area Director.
Step 2 -Abatement shall have been completed by the implementation of
feasible
engineering controls upon verification of their effectiveness in achieving
compliance.
Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:    STEP - 1     00/00/00Date by
Which Violation Must be Abated:    STEP - 2     00/00/00
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1400.00
  • · Z (S) $1875.00

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 03 2 instances 182 exposed
Issued
Mar 6, 2009
Abate by
Oct 28, 2009
Penalty
Initial $1,875 · Current $1,400 Reduced

Hazardous substances M102

Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not
furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards
that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees, in that
employees were exposed to dust explosion, deflagration, or other fire
hazards because
methods were not utilized to ensure proper collection and prevent ignition
of combustible of
wood dust during collection operations:
(a)  Sauder Manufacturing Company, Archbold, Ohio:  On or about November
12, 2008,
Baghouse No. 1 and Baghouse No. 2, located outside of the north exterior
wall, had four
explosion vents directed over the processing facility.  The venting was
not directed to a safe
location, away from the occupied processing facility.
Abatement Note:  Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable
abatement method to correct this hazard is to direct the explosion vents
away
from the structure in accordance with the National Fire Protection
Association
(NFPA) 68-2007 Standard on Explosion Protection by Deflagration Venting
Sections 6.6.1 and 6.6.2.
(b)  Sauder Manufacturing Company, Archbold, Ohio:  On or about November
12, 2008,
employees were exposed to fire and a deflagration hazard from recycling
air from the
Exhaust system/Baghouse No. 1 and Exhaust system/Baghouse No. 2 into the
facility.  No
means was provided to prevent the fire and deflagration hazard entering
the occupied facility
through the recycled air system.
Abatement Note:  Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable
abatement method to correct this hazard is to interlink the existing spark
detection system with high-speed abort gates on the two exhaust air duct
conveying recycled air back into the building.  The abort gates are to
divert
any burning material to the atmosphere before it can enter the facility in
accordance with the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 664-2007
Standard for the Prevention of Fires and Explosions in Wood Processing and
Woodworking Facilities section 8.2.2.6.2(1) through (3).
Abatement Schedule
Step 1 -A written detailed plan of abatement shall be submitted to the Area
Director outlining a schedule for the implementation of engineering
controls, instrumentation, and equipment to protect employees from fire
and deflagration hazards related to combustible dust as referenced in
this citation. This plan shall include, at a minimum, target dates for the
following actions which must be consistent with the abatement dates
required by this citation:
(1)  Evaluation of engineering control options;
(2)  Selection of optimum control methods and completion of design;and
(3)  Procurement, installation and operation of selected control
measures;
All proposed control measures shall be approved for each particular use
by a person competent in fire and deflagration control of combustible
dusts.  At the conclusion of the 60-day period, the detailed plan for
abatement shall be submitted to the Area Director.
Step 2 -Abatement shall have been completed by the implementation of
feasible
engineering controls upon verification of their effectiveness in achieving
compliance.
Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:    STEP - 1     00/00/00
Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:    STEP - 2     00/00/00
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1400.00
  • · Z (S) $1875.00

5(a)(1)

Deleted Serious Gravity 03 1 instance 182 exposed
Issued
Mar 6, 2009
Abate by
Aug 28, 2009
Penalty
Initial $1,875 · Current $1,875

Hazardous substances M102

Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer
did not
furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards
that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees, in that
employees were exposed to dust explosion, deflagration, or other fire
hazards because
methods were not utilized to ensure proper trasnport and prevent ignition
of combustible
wood dusts during the transport operations:
(a)  Sauder Manufacturing Company, Archbold, Ohio:  On or about November
12, 2008, a
vertical and diagonal screw conveyor connects Baghouse No. 1 and Baghouse
No. 2 to the
storage silo.  No means was provided to prevent the propagation of a
deflagration to the
storage silo through the screw conveyor.  Employees were exposed to
deflagration hazard.
Abatement Note:  Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable
abatement method to correct this hazard is to install a choke in each
conveyor
to prevent the propagation of a deflagration between the baghouses and the
storage silo in accordance with the National Fire Protection Association
(NFPA) 664-2007 Standard for the Prevention of Fires and Explosions in
Wood Processing and Woodworking Facilities, section 8.2.4.1 and 8.10.3.3.
Abatement Schedule
Step 1 -A written detailed plan of abatement shall be submitted to the Area
Director outlining a schedule for the implementation of engineering
controls, instrumentation, and equipment to protect employees from fire
and deflagration hazards related to combustible dust as referenced in
this citation. This plan shall include, at a minimum, target dates for the
following actions which must be consistent with the abatement dates
required by this citation:
(1)  Evaluation of engineering control options;
(2)  Selection of optimum control methods and completion of design;
and
(3)  Procurement, installation and operation of selected control
measures;
All proposed control measures shall be approved for each particular use
by a person competent in fire and deflagration control of combustible
dusts.  At the conclusion of the 60-day period, the detailed plan for
abatement shall be submitted to the Area Director.
Step 2 -Abatement shall have been completed by the implementation of
feasible
engineering controls upon verification of their effectiveness in achieving
compliance.
Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:    STEP - 1     00/00/00
Date by Which Violation Must be Abated:    STEP - 2     00/00/00
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $1875.00
  • · Z (S) $1875.00

1910.134 E01

Serious Gravity 01 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 12, 2008
Abate by
Dec 17, 2008
Penalty
Initial $1,125 · Current $788 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $788.00
  • · Z (S) $1125.00

1910.107 B05 I

Other-than-serious Gravity 01 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 12, 2008
Abate by
Dec 17, 2008
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O)
  • · Z (O)

1910.134 C02 I

Other-than-serious Gravity 01 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 12, 2008
Abate by
Dec 17, 2008
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O)
  • · Z (O)

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 311606248.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.