TURNER, ME —
OSHA Inspection: MAINE CONTRACT FARMING, LLC
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of MAINE CONTRACT FARMING, LLC in 272 PLAINS ROAD, TURNER, ME 04282 (NAICS 112310). OSHA activity number 311802631.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- MAINE CONTRACT FARMING, LLC
- Site address
- 272 PLAINS ROAD
- City
- TURNER
- State
- ME
- ZIP
- 04282
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 112310
- SIC code (legacy)
- 0252
- Employees
- 97
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Aug 8, 2008
- Abate by
- Aug 13, 2008
- Penalty
- Initial $5,000 · Current $2,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer is not furnishing employment and a place of employment which are free from recognized hazards that are causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees are exposed to injuries caused by the operation, collision, and/or rollover of powered industrial trucks and the failure to wear seatbelts: The employer does not protect employees from injuries caused by the failure to wear seatbelts. The violation was most recently observed at the following location and date: Dynalift Powered Industrial Truck - On or about 02/28/2008, the operator was not utilizing an operator restraint system. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is for vehicle operators to wear seatbelts. Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, the employer must submit documents describing the steps it is taking to ensure Compliance, including a description of how these steps protect employees from operation, collision, and/or rollover hazards. (An abatement plan and periodic progress reports may also be required if the abatement period is more than 90 days.)
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2500.00
- — Z (S) $5000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Aug 8, 2008
- Abate by
- Aug 14, 2008
- Penalty
- Initial $5,000 · Current $2,500 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer is not furnishing employment and a place of employment which are free from recognized hazards that are causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees are exposed to internal injuries, fractures, or death due to possible structural collapse caused by ice and snow: The employer does not protect employees from structures overloaded with ice and snow. The violation was most recently observed at the following location and date: Plant 7 - On or about 02/16/2008, under the weight of snow and ice, approximately 14 roof trusses failed resulting in the partial collapse of the plant roof and ceiling. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to determine each structures load bearing capacity, measure snow depths, determine snow weight, and remove snow as necessary. Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, the employer must submit documents describing the steps it is taking to ensure Compliance, including a description of how these steps protect employees from snow loads. (An abatement plan and periodic progress reports may also be required if the abatement period is more than 90 days.)
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2500.00
- — Z (S) $5000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Aug 8, 2008
- Abate by
- Aug 14, 2008
- Penalty
- Initial $70,000 · Current $50,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer is not furnishing employment and a place of employment which are free from recognized hazards that are causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees are exposed to the hazards of being struck-by falling building sections when entering or climbing onto a structurally compromised building: The employer does not protect employees from the hazards of a structurally compromised building. The violation was most recently observed at the following location and date: Plant 7 - On or about 02/16/2008, employees were not protected from struck-by hazards when entering or climbing onto a partially collapsed building. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to ensure employees remain outside and off of structurally compromised buildings until it has been stabilized or demolished and comply with the International Building Code (IBC) 2003. Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, the employer must submit documents describing the steps it is taking to ensure Compliance, including a description of how these steps protect employees from structural collapse. (An abatement plan and periodic progress reports may also be required if the abatement period is more than 90 days.)
Recent events (2)
- — I (W) $50000.00
- — Z (W) $70000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Aug 8, 2008
- Abate by
- Aug 14, 2008
- Penalty
- Initial $70,000 · Current $50,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer is not furnishing employment and a place of employment which are free from recognized hazards that are causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees are exposed to fall hazards while working on or from unprotected elevated locations: The employer does not require the use of any form of fall protection. The violation was most recently observed at the following locations: Plant 1 - On or about 02/28/2008, the employees shoveling the roof 22 feet above the ground were not utilizing fall protection. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to require employees to utilize fall protection when working at heights exceeding four feet. Pursuant to 29 CFR 1903.19, the employer must submit documents describing the steps it is taking to ensure Compliance, including a description of how these steps protect employees from fall hazards. (An abatement plan and periodic progress reports may also be required if the abatement period is more than 90 days.)
Recent events (2)
- — I (W) $50000.00
- — Z (W) $70000.00
More inspections at Maine Contract Farming, LLC
View Maine Contract Farming, LLC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 112310)
More inspections in ME
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 311802631.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.