Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ALBERT PLASTERING CO., INC.

Accident-driven inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an accident-driven safety inspection of ALBERT PLASTERING CO., INC. in FT. SMITH CONVENTION CTR., 55 SO. 7TH ST., FORT SMITH, AR 72903 (NAICS 238310). OSHA activity number 311829121.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Albert Plastering CO., INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Albert Plastering CO., INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
FT. SMITH CONVENTION CTR., 55 SO. 7TH ST.
City
FORT SMITH
State
AR
ZIP
72903
Mailing
2400 HICKMAN BLUFF ROAD, LAVACA, AR 72941
Inspection type
Accident-driven (A)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
Yes
Union status
N
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238310
SIC code (legacy)
1742
Employees
3
Ownership type
A
Industry flags
Construction safety.

4 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance
Issued
Oct 15, 2008
Abate by
Oct 20, 2008
Penalty
Initial $1,500 · Current $1,000 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did
not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized
hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical
harm to employees
in that employees were exposed to falls from elevations in the following
instances: On
or about May 17, 2008 and at times thereto at the jobsite located at 55
South 7th St. in
Fort Smith, Arkansas: [A] Employees were found to be exposed to fall
hazards, while
working from and as passengers on a personnel platform being lifted by a
Caterpillar
Model TH63, PIN 5WM02216 Telescopic Handler extendible boom rough terrain
forklift
truck. The employees were working approximately 13 to 27 feet above the
level below
without the benefit of a fall protection system. Among other methods, two
feasible and
acceptable means of abatement method to correct this hazard are: (1)
Provide employees
working in elevated personnel platforms with personal fall protection (2)
Comply with
ANSI B56.6- 2005 Section 5.15.1, "Safety Standard for Rough Terrain
Forklift
Trucks Requirements for Personnel Platforms" In accordance, with this
standard
employees are required to use a full body harness and lanyard anchored to
the personnel
platform. [B] Employees were exposed to a potential fall or tipping hazard
when working
from a platform due to the excessive width of the platform. Additionally,
the extension
of the platform past the width of the truck created a potential for a
springboard action,
whereby, employees not wearing fall protection could be ejected out of the
elevated
platform. The width of the platform was 238 inches and the width of the
forklift
measured across the load bearing tires was 96 inches. Among other methods,
one feasible
and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to comply with
the
requirements set forth in ASME B56.6-2002, Section 8.24, "Platforms for
Elevating
Personnel" which states: Floor dimensions which shall not exceed two times
the load
center distance listed on the rough terrain forklift truck nameplate,
measured parallel to
the longitudinal center plane of the truck, nor have a width greater than
the overall width
of the truck [measured across the load bearing tires plus 10 in.(250 mm)
on either side].
Minimum space for each person on the platform shall not be less than 18
in. (450 mm)
in either direction.
Abatement Disclaimers: 1. The employer is not limited to the abatement
methods above. 2. The
recommended abatement methods may not be effective in all circumstances.
3. The employer
is responsible for selecting an appropriate abatement method.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000.00
  • — Z (S) $1500.00

1926.95 A

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance
Issued
Oct 15, 2008
Abate by
Oct 20, 2008
Penalty
Initial $1,500 · Current $1,000 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000.00
  • — Z (S) $1500.00

1926.451 C02 IV

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance
Issued
Oct 15, 2008
Abate by
Oct 20, 2008
Penalty
Initial $1,500 · Current $1,000 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000.00
  • — Z (S) $1500.00

1910.178 L

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance
Issued
Oct 15, 2008
Abate by
Oct 20, 2008
Penalty
Initial $1,500 · Current $1,000 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1000.00
  • — Z (S) $1500.00

View Albert Plastering CO., INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 311829121.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.