FORT SMITH, AR —
OSHA Inspection: ALBERT PLASTERING CO., INC.
Accident-driven inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an accident-driven safety inspection of ALBERT PLASTERING CO., INC. in FT. SMITH CONVENTION CTR., 55 SO. 7TH ST., FORT SMITH, AR 72903 (NAICS 238310). OSHA activity number 311829121.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- ALBERT PLASTERING CO., INC.
- Site address
- FT. SMITH CONVENTION CTR., 55 SO. 7TH ST.
- City
- FORT SMITH
- State
- AR
- ZIP
- 72903
- Mailing
- 2400 HICKMAN BLUFF ROAD, LAVACA, AR 72941
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Accident-driven (A)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- Yes
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 238310
- SIC code (legacy)
- 1742
- Employees
- 3
- Ownership type
- A
- Industry flags
- Construction safety.
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Oct 15, 2008
- Abate by
- Oct 20, 2008
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to falls from elevations in the following instances: On or about May 17, 2008 and at times thereto at the jobsite located at 55 South 7th St. in Fort Smith, Arkansas: [A] Employees were found to be exposed to fall hazards, while working from and as passengers on a personnel platform being lifted by a Caterpillar Model TH63, PIN 5WM02216 Telescopic Handler extendible boom rough terrain forklift truck. The employees were working approximately 13 to 27 feet above the level below without the benefit of a fall protection system. Among other methods, two feasible and acceptable means of abatement method to correct this hazard are: (1) Provide employees working in elevated personnel platforms with personal fall protection (2) Comply with ANSI B56.6- 2005 Section 5.15.1, "Safety Standard for Rough Terrain Forklift Trucks Requirements for Personnel Platforms" In accordance, with this standard employees are required to use a full body harness and lanyard anchored to the personnel platform. [B] Employees were exposed to a potential fall or tipping hazard when working from a platform due to the excessive width of the platform. Additionally, the extension of the platform past the width of the truck created a potential for a springboard action, whereby, employees not wearing fall protection could be ejected out of the elevated platform. The width of the platform was 238 inches and the width of the forklift measured across the load bearing tires was 96 inches. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to comply with the requirements set forth in ASME B56.6-2002, Section 8.24, "Platforms for Elevating Personnel" which states: Floor dimensions which shall not exceed two times the load center distance listed on the rough terrain forklift truck nameplate, measured parallel to the longitudinal center plane of the truck, nor have a width greater than the overall width of the truck [measured across the load bearing tires plus 10 in.(250 mm) on either side]. Minimum space for each person on the platform shall not be less than 18 in. (450 mm) in either direction. Abatement Disclaimers: 1. The employer is not limited to the abatement methods above. 2. The recommended abatement methods may not be effective in all circumstances. 3. The employer is responsible for selecting an appropriate abatement method.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000.00
- — Z (S) $1500.00
1926.95 A
- Issued
- Oct 15, 2008
- Abate by
- Oct 20, 2008
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $1,000 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000.00
- — Z (S) $1500.00
1926.451 C02 IV
- Issued
- Oct 15, 2008
- Abate by
- Oct 20, 2008
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $1,000 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000.00
- — Z (S) $1500.00
1910.178 L
- Issued
- Oct 15, 2008
- Abate by
- Oct 20, 2008
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $1,000 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000.00
- — Z (S) $1500.00
More inspections at Albert Plastering CO., INC.
View Albert Plastering CO., INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 238310)
More inspections in AR
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 311829121.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.