Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: LANCE, INC.

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of LANCE, INC. in 8600 SOUTH BLVD., CHARLOTTE, NC 28273 (NAICS 311919). OSHA activity number 312604218.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Lance, INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Lance, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
LANCE, INC.
Site address
8600 SOUTH BLVD.
City
CHARLOTTE
State
NC
ZIP
28273
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
N
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
311919
SIC code (legacy)
2052
Employees
1200
Ownership type
A
Industry flags
Manufacturing health.

41 citations on file for this inspection.

95012901

Serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Dec 16, 2008
Abate by
Jan 13, 2009
Penalty
Initial $1,375 · Current $900 Reduced
North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety
and Health Act of North Carolina:  The employer did not furnish
employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or
serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed
to the hazard of being burned by cooking oil:
a)chip plant crunchy product line, the employer
did not have standardized operating procedures
for cleaning the cooker/lines and starting the
system up after shut down.
NOTE:  Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method to
abate this hazard is:
1.Develop standardized operating procedures and
train employees in those procedures.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $900.00
  • — Z (S) $1375.00

95012901

Deleted Serious 3 instances 100 exposed
Issued
Dec 16, 2008
Abate by
Feb 4, 2009
Penalty
Initial $5,600 · Current $5,600
North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational
Safety and Health Act of North Carolina:  The employer did not
furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or
serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed
to the hazard of fire and explosion because methods were not
utilized to prevent combustible dust from becoming airborne:
a)flour silo tower room - silos, sifters, dust
collectors, and other equipment were not
equipped with a ventilation system to capture
the flour and the employer did not develop a
method to prevent the escape of flour from
the equipment into the surrounding
environment.
b)use tank/reimelt room - tanks, dust
collectors, and other equipment were not
equipped with a ventilation system to capture
the flour and the employer did not develop a
method to prevent the escape of flour from
the equipment into the surrounding
environment.
c)elevator control room - the room and
equipment was not equipped with a ventilation
system to capture the flour and the employer
did not develop a method to prevent the
escape of flour from the equipment into the
surrounding environment.
NOTE:  Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method to
abate this hazard is to comply with National Fire Protection
Agency (NFPA) 61, "Standard for the Prevention of Fires and Dust
Explosions in Agricultural and Food Processing Facilities"
(2008), including, but not limited to:
*10.3.1-  A method to prevent the escape of dust from
process equipment into the surrounding environment.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $5600.00
  • — Z (S) $5600.00

1910.22 A01

Serious 3 instances 100 exposed
Issued
Dec 16, 2008
Abate by
Jan 13, 2009
Penalty
Current $3,650
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3650.00
  • — Z (S)

1910.22 A02

Serious 3 instances 100 exposed
Issued
Dec 16, 2008
Abate by
Jan 13, 2009

1910.307 C

Serious 3 instances 100 exposed
Issued
Dec 16, 2008
Abate by
Mar 27, 2009
Recent events (2)
  • — P (S)
  • — Z (S)

1910.1200 H01

Serious 1 instance 100 exposed
Issued
Dec 16, 2008
Abate by
Jan 13, 2009

95012901

Serious 2 instances 100 exposed
Issued
Dec 16, 2008
Abate by
Feb 22, 2010
Penalty
Current $3,000
North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational
Safety and Health Act of North Carolina:  The employer did not
furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or
serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed
to the hazard of fire and explosion because air material
separators (dust collectors) were located inside the building
and were not designed to minimize damage that would occur in the
event of a dust explosion:
a)flour silo tower room - dust collectors were
installed inside the room and on the top of
the silos which were not vented to the
outside, did not contain an explosion
suppression system, and were not designed to
minimize damage.
b)use tank/reimelt room - dust collectors were
installed on the top of use tanks which were
not vented to the outside, did not contain an
explosion suppression system, and were not
designed to minimize damage.
NOTE:  Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method to
abate this hazard is:
1.  Comply with National Fire Protection Agency (NFPA) 61,
"Standard for the Prevention of Fires and Dust
Explosions in Agricultural and Food Processing
Facilities" (2008), including, but not limited to:
*10.4.3-  Dust collectors shall be located outside of
buildings and shall be protected in accordance with
Section 6.3
(NOTE: Dust collectors shall be permitted inside the
buildings if the employer complies with one of five
exceptions as stated in this Section.)
2. Comply with National Fire Protection Agency (NFPA) 69,
"Standard on Explosion Prevention Systems" (2008).
3.  Comply with National Fire Protection Agency (NFPA) 68,
"Standard on Explosion Protection by Deflagration
Venting" (2007)."
Recent events (4)
  • — Q $5600.00
  • — P (S) $3000.00
  • — I (S) $3000.00

95012901

Deleted Serious 2 instances 100 exposed
Issued
Dec 16, 2008
Abate by
Feb 4, 2009
North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational
Safety and Health Act of North Carolina:  The employer did not
furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or
serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed
to the hazard of fire and explosion because rooms, buildings, and
other enclosures were not provided with explosion relief venting:
a)flour silo tower room - the room which
contained flour transfer, storage, and
processing equipment was not designed with
explosion relief venting.
b)use tank/reimelt room - the room which
contained flour transfer, storage, and
processing equipment was not designed with
explosion relief venting.
NOTE:  Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method to
abate this hazard is:
1. Comply with National Fire Protection Agency (NFPA) 61,
"Standard for the Prevention of Fires and Dust
Explosions in Agricultural and Food Processing
Facilities" (2008), including, but not limited to:
*6.2.1-  If a dust explosion hazard exists in rooms,
buildings, or other enclosures, such areas shall be
provided with explosion relief venting distributed over
the exterior walls (and roof if applicable).
2.  Comply with National Fire Protection Agency (NFPA) 69,
"Standard on Explosion Prevention Systems" (2008).
3.  Comply with National Fire Protection Agency (NFPA) 68,
"Standard on Explosion Protection by Deflagration
Venting" (2007).
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S)
  • — Z (S)

1910.24 E

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 16, 2008
Abate by
Dec 19, 2008
Penalty
Initial $1,375
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O)
  • — Z (S) $1375.00

1910.27 D02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 16, 2008
Abate by
Jan 13, 2009
Penalty
Initial $1,925
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O)
  • — Z (S) $1925.00

1910.146 C04

Deleted Serious 1 instance 21 exposed
Issued
Dec 16, 2008
Abate by
Jan 13, 2009
Penalty
Initial $1,925 · Current $1,925
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1925.00
  • — Z (S) $1925.00

1910.146 C03

Other-than-serious 1 instance 21 exposed
Issued
Dec 16, 2008
Abate by
Jan 13, 2009
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O)
  • — Z (S)

1910.146 C02

Other-than-serious 1 instance 21 exposed
Issued
Dec 16, 2008
Abate by
Jan 13, 2009
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O)
  • — Z (S)

1910.147 C04 II

Serious 4 instances 8 exposed
Issued
Dec 16, 2008
Abate by
Feb 4, 2009
Penalty
Initial $5,600 · Current $3,650 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3650.00
  • — Z (S) $5600.00

1910.147 F03 II

Serious 1 instance 8 exposed
Issued
Dec 16, 2008
Abate by
Feb 4, 2009

1910.147 C06 I

Serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Dec 16, 2008
Abate by
Feb 4, 2009

1910.151 C

Other-than-serious 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Dec 16, 2008
Abate by
Dec 19, 2008
Penalty
Initial $688
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O)
  • — Z (S) $688.00

1910.212 A01

Serious 5 instances 12 exposed
Issued
Dec 16, 2008
Abate by
Mar 27, 2009
Penalty
Initial $1,375 · Current $1,000 Reduced
Recent events (3)
  • — P (S) $1000.00
  • — I (S) $1000.00
  • — Z (S) $1375.00

1910.212 A03 II

Serious 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 16, 2008
Abate by
Dec 19, 2008

1910.215 B09

Serious 3 instances 9 exposed
Issued
Dec 16, 2008
Abate by
Dec 19, 2008
Penalty
Initial $825 · Current $500 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $500.00
  • — Z (S) $825.00

1910.215 A04

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 16, 2008
Abate by
Dec 19, 2008
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O)
  • — Z (O)

1910.215 D01

Other-than-serious 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Dec 16, 2008
Abate by
Dec 19, 2008
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O)
  • — Z (S)

1910.254 D09 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 16, 2008
Abate by
Dec 19, 2008
Penalty
Initial $1,925
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O)
  • — Z (S) $1925.00

1910.22 D01

Other-than-serious 3 instances 10 exposed
Issued
Dec 16, 2008
Abate by
Feb 4, 2009

1910.37 B04

Other-than-serious 2 instances 7 exposed
Issued
Dec 16, 2008
Abate by
Dec 19, 2008

1910.37 B05

Other-than-serious 4 instances 30 exposed
Issued
Dec 16, 2008
Abate by
Dec 19, 2008

1910.110 B06 VI

Other-than-serious 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Dec 16, 2008
Abate by
Jan 13, 2009

1910.178 A03

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 16, 2008
Abate by
Dec 19, 2008

1910.178 L04 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 16, 2008
Abate by
Dec 19, 2008

1910.184 D

Other-than-serious 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 16, 2008
Abate by
Dec 19, 2008

1910.212 B

Other-than-serious 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 16, 2008
Abate by
Dec 19, 2008

1910.219 C04 I

Deleted Other-than-serious 2 instances 5 exposed
Issued
Dec 16, 2008
Abate by
Dec 19, 2008
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O)
  • — Z (O)

1910.253 B04 III

Other-than-serious 1 instance 9 exposed
Issued
Dec 16, 2008
Abate by
Dec 19, 2008

1910.303 B02

Deleted Other-than-serious 2 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 16, 2008
Abate by
Dec 19, 2008
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O)
  • — Z (O)

1910.303 B07 I

Other-than-serious 7 instances 3 exposed
Issued
Dec 16, 2008
Abate by
Dec 19, 2008

1910.303 B07 IV

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Dec 16, 2008
Abate by
Dec 19, 2008

1910.303 B08 I

Deleted Other-than-serious 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Dec 16, 2008
Abate by
Dec 19, 2008
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O)
  • — Z (O)

1910.303 F02

Other-than-serious 2 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Dec 16, 2008
Abate by
Jan 13, 2009

1910.304 G05

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Dec 16, 2008
Abate by
Dec 19, 2008

1910.305 G02 III

Other-than-serious 4 instances
Issued
Dec 16, 2008
Abate by
Dec 19, 2008

1910.1001 J02 I

Other-than-serious 1 instance 5 exposed
Issued
Dec 16, 2008
Abate by
Dec 19, 2008

View Lance, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 312604218.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.