BELVIDERE, IL ·
OSHA Inspection: NDK CRYSTALS, INC.
Referral inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of NDK CRYSTALS, INC. in 701 CRYSTAL PARKWAY, BELVIDERE, IL 61008 (NAICS 325998). OSHA activity number 312731425.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- NDK CRYSTALS, INC.
- Site address
- 701 CRYSTAL PARKWAY
- City
- BELVIDERE
- State
- IL
- ZIP
- 61008
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Non-union (N)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 325998
- SIC code (legacy)
- 2819
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
Citations
20 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- May 27, 2010
- Abate by
- Jun 29, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $2,000 Reduced
2260
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees, in that: a)NDK Crystals, Incorporated - On or about December 7, 2009, employees routinely occupied the control room, adjacent QC Department, Lascas Prep Room, and office building. The employees were exposed to a potential explosion that would result in extremely high blast overpressures, caustic, boiling solution, and flying process building debris. The employer did not evaluate the building for external explosion and fires. Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d). The feasible means by which the hazard may be corrected would be to comply with the Center for Chemical Process Safety's guidelines for "Evaluating Process Plant and Buildings for External Explosions and Fires". This is the recognized facility sitting evaluation protocol in the chemical industry. Another feasible means by which the hazard may be corrected would be to comply with the American Petroleum Institute's guidelines for "Management of Hazards Associated with Locations of Process Plant Buildings". This is another recognized facility siting evaluation protocol in the chemical industry.
Recent events (3)
- · J (S) $2000.00
- · F (S) $2000.00
- · Z (S) $7000.00
1910.38 C01
- Issued
- May 27, 2010
- Abate by
- Jun 29, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $2,000 Reduced
2260
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $2000.00
- · J (S) $2000.00
- · Z (S) $7000.00
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- May 27, 2010
- Abate by
- Jun 29, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $750 Reduced
2260
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $750.00
- · J (S) $750.00
- · Z (S) $2000.00
1910.132 F04
- Issued
- May 27, 2010
- Abate by
- Jun 29, 2010
2260
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- May 27, 2010
- Abate by
- Jun 29, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $750 Reduced
2260
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $750.00
- · J (S) $750.00
- · Z (S) $2000.00
1910.1200 H01
- Issued
- May 27, 2010
- Abate by
- Jun 29, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $2,000 · Current $500 Reduced
2260
Recent events (3)
- · F (S) $500.00
- · J (S) $500.00
- · Z (S) $2000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- May 27, 2010
- Abate by
- Jun 29, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $70,000
- Emphasis program
- X
2260
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that: On or about December 7, 2009, employees were exposed to explosion, struck-by, and burn hazards during the operation of high-pressure vessel No. 1 which was known to be defectively designed and fabricated and thereby subject to catastrophic failure. Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d). Feasible abatement methods would include, but not limited to: Conduct inspections of the vessel in accordance with API 572 Inspection Practices for Pressure Vessels, and conduct quantitative engineering evaluations of the vessel in accordance with API 579/ASME FFS-1 Fitness for Service, to demonstrate the structural integrity of the vessel and to determine whether the vessel could be safely operated in the future.
Recent events (3)
- · F (W)
- · J (W)
- · Z (W) $70000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- May 27, 2010
- Abate by
- Jun 29, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $70,000
- Emphasis program
- X
2260
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that: On or about December 7, 2009, employees were exposed to explosion, struck-by, and burn hazards during the operation of high-pressure vessel No. 2 which was known to be defectively designed and fabricated and thereby subject to catastrophic failure. Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d). Feasible abatement methods would include, but not limited to: Conduct inspections of the vessel in accordance with API 572 Inspection Practices for Pressure Vessels, and conduct quantitative engineering evaluations of the vessel in accordance with API 579/ASME FFS-1 Fitness for Service, to demonstrate the structural integrity of the vessel and to determine whether the vessel could be safely operated in the future.
Recent events (3)
- · F (W)
- · J (W)
- · Z (W) $70000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- May 27, 2010
- Abate by
- Jun 29, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $70,000
- Emphasis program
- X
2260
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that: On or about December 7, 2009, employees were exposed to explosion, struck-by, and burn hazards during the operation of high-pressure vessel No. 3 which was known to be defectively designed and fabricated and thereby subject to catastrophic failure. Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d). Feasible Abatement methods would include, but not limited to: Conduct inspections of the vessel in accordance with API 572 Inspection Practices for Pressure Vessels, and conduct quantitative engineering evaluations of the vessel in accordance with API 579/ASME FFS-1 Fitness for Service, to demonstrate the structural integrity of the vessel and to determine whether the vessel could be safely operated in the future.
Recent events (3)
- · F (W)
- · J (W)
- · Z (W) $70000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- May 27, 2010
- Abate by
- Jun 29, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $70,000
- Emphasis program
- X
2260
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that: On or about December 7, 2009, employees were exposed to explosion, struck-by, and burn hazards during the operation of high-pressure vessel No. 4 which was known to be defectively designed and fabricated and thereby subject to catastrophic failure. Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d). Feasible abatement methods would include, but not limited to: Conduct inspections of the vessel in accordance with API 572 Inspection Practices for Pressure Vessels, and conduct quantitative engineering evaluations of the vessel in accordance with API 579/ASME FFS-1 Fitness for Service, to demonstrate the structural integrity of the vessel and to determine whether the vessel could be safely operated in the future.
Recent events (3)
- · F (W)
- · J (W)
- · Z (W) $70000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- May 27, 2010
- Abate by
- Jun 29, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $70,000
- Emphasis program
- X
2260
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that: On or about November 30, 2009, employees were exposed to explosion, struck-by, and burn hazards during the operation of high-pressure vessel No. 5 which was known to be defectively designed and fabricated and thereby subject to catastrophic failure. Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d). Feasible abatement methods would include, but not limited to: Conduct inspections of the vessel in accordance with API 572 Inspection Practices for Pressure Vessels, and conduct quantitative engineering evaluations of the vessel in accordance with API 579/ASME FFS-1 Fitness for Service, to demonstrate the structural integrity of the vessel and to determine whether the vessel could be safely operated in the future.
Recent events (3)
- · J (W)
- · F (W)
- · Z (W) $70000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- May 27, 2010
- Abate by
- Jun 29, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $70,000
- Emphasis program
- X
2260
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that: On or about December 7, 2009, employees were exposed to explosion, struck-by, and burn hazards during the operation of high-pressure vessel No. 6 which was known to be defectively designed and fabricated and thereby subject to catastrophic failure. Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d). Feasible abatement methods would include, but not limited to: Conduct inspections of the vessel in accordance with API 572 Inspection Practices for Pressure Vessels, and conduct quantitative engineering evaluations of the vessel in accordance with API 579/ASME FFS-1 Fitness for Service, to demonstrate the structural integrity of the vessel and to determine whether the vessel could be safely operated in the future.
Recent events (3)
- · F (W)
- · J (W)
- · Z (W) $70000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- May 27, 2010
- Abate by
- Jun 29, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $70,000
- Emphasis program
- X
2260
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that: On or about December 7, 2009, employees were exposed to explosion, struck-by, and burn hazards during the operation of high-pressure vessel No. 8 which was known to be defectively designed and fabricated and thereby subject to catastrophic failure. Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the requirements of 29 CFR 1903.19(d). Feasible abatement methods would include, but not limited to: Conduct inspections of the vessel in accordance with API 572 Inspection Practices for Pressure Vessels, and conduct quantitative engineering evaluations of the vessel in accordance with API 579/ASME FFS-1 Fitness for Service, to demonstrate the structural integrity of the vessel and to determine whether the vessel could be safely operated in the future.
Recent events (3)
- · F (W)
- · J (W)
- · Z (W) $70000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- May 27, 2010
- Abate by
- Jun 29, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $70,000 · Current $58,000 Reduced
- Emphasis program
- X
2260
Recent events (3)
- · F (W) $58000.00
- · J (W) $58000.00
- · Z (W) $70000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- May 27, 2010
- Abate by
- Jun 29, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $70,000
- Emphasis program
- X
2260
Recent events (3)
- · F (W)
- · J (W)
- · Z (W) $70000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- May 27, 2010
- Abate by
- Jun 29, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $70,000 · Current $58,000 Reduced
- Emphasis program
- X
2260
Recent events (3)
- · F (W) $58000.00
- · J (W) $58000.00
- · Z (W) $70000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- May 27, 2010
- Abate by
- Jun 29, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $70,000
- Emphasis program
- X
2260
Recent events (3)
- · F (W)
- · J (W)
- · Z (W) $70000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- May 27, 2010
- Abate by
- Jun 29, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $70,000 · Current $58,000 Reduced
- Emphasis program
- X
2260
Recent events (3)
- · F (W) $58000.00
- · J (W) $58000.00
- · Z (W) $70000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- May 27, 2010
- Abate by
- Jun 29, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $70,000
- Emphasis program
- X
2260
Recent events (3)
- · F (W)
- · J (W)
- · Z (W) $70000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- May 27, 2010
- Abate by
- Jun 29, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $70,000
- Emphasis program
- X
2260
Recent events (3)
- · F (W)
- · J (W)
- · Z (W) $70000.00
More inspections at NDK Crystals, INC.
View NDK Crystals, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 325998)
More inspections in IL
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 312731425.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.