Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,197,549Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-27 Last loaded 2026-08-31

OSHA Inspection: NDK CRYSTALS, INC.

Referral inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a referral health inspection of NDK CRYSTALS, INC. in 701 CRYSTAL PARKWAY, BELVIDERE, IL 61008 (NAICS 325998). OSHA activity number 312731425.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch NDK Crystals, INC. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for NDK Crystals, INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
NDK CRYSTALS, INC.
Site address
701 CRYSTAL PARKWAY
City
BELVIDERE
State
IL
ZIP
61008
Inspection type
Referral (C)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (N)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
325998
SIC code (legacy)
2819
Employees
6
Ownership type
Private (A)

20 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
May 27, 2010
Abate by
Jun 29, 2010
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $2,000 Reduced

Hazardous substances 2260

Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not
furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards that
were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees, in that:
a)NDK Crystals, Incorporated - On or about December 7, 2009, employees
routinely
occupied the control room, adjacent QC Department, Lascas Prep Room, and
office building.
The employees were exposed to a potential explosion that would result in
extremely high blast
overpressures, caustic, boiling solution, and flying process building
debris.  The employer did
not evaluate the building for external explosion and fires.
Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the
requirements of 29
CFR 1903.19(d).
The feasible means by which the hazard may be corrected would be to comply
with the Center
for Chemical Process Safety's guidelines for "Evaluating Process Plant and
Buildings for
External Explosions and Fires".  This is the recognized facility sitting
evaluation protocol in the
chemical industry.
Another feasible means by which the hazard may be corrected would be to
comply with the
American Petroleum Institute's guidelines for "Management of Hazards
Associated with
Locations of Process Plant Buildings".  This is another recognized
facility siting evaluation
protocol in the chemical industry.
Recent events (3)
  • · J (S) $2000.00
  • · F (S) $2000.00
  • · Z (S) $7000.00

1910.38 C01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
May 27, 2010
Abate by
Jun 29, 2010
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $2,000 Reduced

Hazardous substances 2260

Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $2000.00
  • · J (S) $2000.00
  • · Z (S) $7000.00

1910.132 D02

Serious Gravity 02 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
May 27, 2010
Abate by
Jun 29, 2010
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $750 Reduced

Hazardous substances 2260

Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $750.00
  • · J (S) $750.00
  • · Z (S) $2000.00

1910.132 F04

Serious Gravity 02 5 instances 5 exposed
Issued
May 27, 2010
Abate by
Jun 29, 2010

Hazardous substances 2260

1910.1200 E01

Serious Gravity 02 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
May 27, 2010
Abate by
Jun 29, 2010
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $750 Reduced

Hazardous substances 2260

Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $750.00
  • · J (S) $750.00
  • · Z (S) $2000.00

1910.1200 H01

Serious Gravity 02 4 instances 4 exposed
Issued
May 27, 2010
Abate by
Jun 29, 2010
Penalty
Initial $2,000 · Current $500 Reduced

Hazardous substances 2260

Recent events (3)
  • · F (S) $500.00
  • · J (S) $500.00
  • · Z (S) $2000.00

5(a)(1)

Deleted Willful Gravity 10 7 instances 6 exposed
Issued
May 27, 2010
Abate by
Jun 29, 2010
Penalty
Initial $70,000
Emphasis program
X

Hazardous substances 2260

Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not
furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized
hazards that
were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees in that:
On or about December 7, 2009, employees were exposed to explosion,
struck-by, and burn
hazards during the operation of high-pressure vessel No. 1 which was known
to be defectively
designed and fabricated and thereby subject to catastrophic failure.
Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the
requirements of 29
CFR 1903.19(d).
Feasible abatement methods would include, but not limited to:
Conduct inspections of the vessel in accordance with API 572 Inspection
Practices for Pressure
Vessels, and conduct quantitative engineering evaluations of the vessel in
accordance with API
579/ASME FFS-1 Fitness for Service, to demonstrate the structural
integrity of the vessel and
to determine whether the vessel could be safely operated in the future.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (W)
  • · J (W)
  • · Z (W) $70000.00

5(a)(1)

Deleted Willful Gravity 10 7 instances 6 exposed
Issued
May 27, 2010
Abate by
Jun 29, 2010
Penalty
Initial $70,000
Emphasis program
X

Hazardous substances 2260

Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not
furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards that
were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees in that:
On or about December 7, 2009, employees were exposed to explosion,
struck-by, and burn
hazards during the operation of high-pressure vessel No. 2 which was known
to be defectively
designed and fabricated and thereby subject to catastrophic failure.
Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the
requirements of 29
CFR 1903.19(d).
Feasible abatement methods would include, but not limited to:
Conduct inspections of the vessel in accordance with API 572 Inspection
Practices for Pressure
Vessels, and conduct quantitative engineering evaluations of the vessel in
accordance with API
579/ASME FFS-1 Fitness for Service, to demonstrate the structural
integrity of the vessel and
to determine whether the vessel could be safely operated in the future.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (W)
  • · J (W)
  • · Z (W) $70000.00

5(a)(1)

Deleted Willful Gravity 10 7 instances 6 exposed
Issued
May 27, 2010
Abate by
Jun 29, 2010
Penalty
Initial $70,000
Emphasis program
X

Hazardous substances 2260

Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not
furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards that
were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees in that:
On or about December 7, 2009, employees were exposed to explosion,
struck-by, and burn
hazards during the operation of high-pressure vessel No. 3 which was known
to be defectively
designed and fabricated and thereby subject to catastrophic failure.
Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the
requirements of 29
CFR 1903.19(d).
Feasible Abatement methods would include, but not limited to:
Conduct inspections of the vessel in accordance with API 572 Inspection
Practices
for Pressure
Vessels, and conduct quantitative engineering evaluations of the vessel in
accordance with API
579/ASME FFS-1 Fitness for Service, to demonstrate the structural
integrity of the vessel and
to determine whether the vessel could be safely operated in the future.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (W)
  • · J (W)
  • · Z (W) $70000.00

5(a)(1)

Deleted Willful Gravity 10 7 instances 6 exposed
Issued
May 27, 2010
Abate by
Jun 29, 2010
Penalty
Initial $70,000
Emphasis program
X

Hazardous substances 2260

Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not
furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards that
were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees in that:
On or about December 7, 2009, employees were exposed to explosion,
struck-by, and burn
hazards during the operation of high-pressure vessel No. 4 which was known
to be defectively
designed and fabricated and thereby subject to catastrophic failure.
Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the
requirements of 29
CFR 1903.19(d).
Feasible abatement methods would include, but not limited to:
Conduct inspections of the vessel in accordance with API 572 Inspection
Practices for Pressure
Vessels, and conduct quantitative engineering evaluations of the vessel in
accordance with API
579/ASME FFS-1 Fitness for Service, to demonstrate the structural
integrity of the vessel and
to determine whether the vessel could be safely operated in the future.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (W)
  • · J (W)
  • · Z (W) $70000.00

5(a)(1)

Deleted Willful Gravity 10 7 instances 6 exposed
Issued
May 27, 2010
Abate by
Jun 29, 2010
Penalty
Initial $70,000
Emphasis program
X

Hazardous substances 2260

Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not
furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards that
were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees in that:
On or about November 30, 2009, employees were exposed to explosion,
struck-by, and burn
hazards during the operation of high-pressure vessel No. 5 which was known
to be defectively
designed and fabricated and thereby subject to catastrophic failure.
Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the
requirements
of 29
CFR 1903.19(d).
Feasible abatement methods would include, but not limited to:
Conduct inspections of the vessel in accordance with API 572 Inspection
Practices for Pressure
Vessels, and conduct quantitative engineering evaluations of the vessel in
accordance with API
579/ASME FFS-1 Fitness for Service, to demonstrate the structural
integrity of the vessel and
to determine whether the vessel could be safely operated in the future.
Recent events (3)
  • · J (W)
  • · F (W)
  • · Z (W) $70000.00

5(a)(1)

Deleted Willful Gravity 10 7 instances 6 exposed
Issued
May 27, 2010
Abate by
Jun 29, 2010
Penalty
Initial $70,000
Emphasis program
X

Hazardous substances 2260

Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not
furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards that
were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees in that:
On or about December 7, 2009, employees were exposed to explosion,
struck-by, and burn
hazards during the operation of high-pressure vessel No. 6 which was known
to be defectively
designed and fabricated and thereby subject to catastrophic failure.
Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the
requirements of 29
CFR 1903.19(d).
Feasible abatement methods would include, but not limited to:
Conduct inspections of the vessel in accordance with API 572 Inspection
Practices for Pressure
Vessels, and conduct quantitative engineering evaluations of the vessel in
accordance with API
579/ASME FFS-1 Fitness for Service, to demonstrate the structural
integrity of the vessel and
to determine whether the vessel could be safely operated in the future.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (W)
  • · J (W)
  • · Z (W) $70000.00

5(a)(1)

Deleted Willful Gravity 10 7 instances 6 exposed
Issued
May 27, 2010
Abate by
Jun 29, 2010
Penalty
Initial $70,000
Emphasis program
X

Hazardous substances 2260

Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not
furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards that
were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees in that:
On or about December 7, 2009, employees were exposed to explosion,
struck-by,
and burn
hazards during the operation of high-pressure vessel No. 8 which was known
to be defectively
designed and fabricated and thereby subject to catastrophic failure.
Abatement documentation is required for this item in accordance with the
requirements of 29
CFR 1903.19(d).
Feasible abatement methods would include, but not limited to:
Conduct inspections of the vessel in accordance with API 572 Inspection
Practices for Pressure
Vessels, and conduct quantitative engineering evaluations of the vessel in
accordance with API
579/ASME FFS-1 Fitness for Service, to demonstrate the structural
integrity of the vessel and
to determine whether the vessel could be safely operated in the future.
Recent events (3)
  • · F (W)
  • · J (W)
  • · Z (W) $70000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 7 instances 6 exposed
Issued
May 27, 2010
Abate by
Jun 29, 2010
Penalty
Initial $70,000 · Current $58,000 Reduced
Emphasis program
X

Hazardous substances 2260

Recent events (3)
  • · F (W) $58000.00
  • · J (W) $58000.00
  • · Z (W) $70000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 7 instances 6 exposed
Issued
May 27, 2010
Abate by
Jun 29, 2010
Penalty
Initial $70,000
Emphasis program
X

Hazardous substances 2260

Recent events (3)
  • · F (W)
  • · J (W)
  • · Z (W) $70000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 7 instances 6 exposed
Issued
May 27, 2010
Abate by
Jun 29, 2010
Penalty
Initial $70,000 · Current $58,000 Reduced
Emphasis program
X

Hazardous substances 2260

Recent events (3)
  • · F (W) $58000.00
  • · J (W) $58000.00
  • · Z (W) $70000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 7 instances 6 exposed
Issued
May 27, 2010
Abate by
Jun 29, 2010
Penalty
Initial $70,000
Emphasis program
X

Hazardous substances 2260

Recent events (3)
  • · F (W)
  • · J (W)
  • · Z (W) $70000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 7 instances 6 exposed
Issued
May 27, 2010
Abate by
Jun 29, 2010
Penalty
Initial $70,000 · Current $58,000 Reduced
Emphasis program
X

Hazardous substances 2260

Recent events (3)
  • · F (W) $58000.00
  • · J (W) $58000.00
  • · Z (W) $70000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 7 instances 6 exposed
Issued
May 27, 2010
Abate by
Jun 29, 2010
Penalty
Initial $70,000
Emphasis program
X

Hazardous substances 2260

Recent events (3)
  • · F (W)
  • · J (W)
  • · Z (W) $70000.00

5(a)(1)

Willful Gravity 10 7 instances 6 exposed
Issued
May 27, 2010
Abate by
Jun 29, 2010
Penalty
Initial $70,000
Emphasis program
X

Hazardous substances 2260

Recent events (3)
  • · F (W)
  • · J (W)
  • · Z (W) $70000.00

View NDK Crystals, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 312731425.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.