COLUMBUS, WI —
OSHA Inspection: AMERICAN PACKAGING CORPORATION
Referral inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a referral safety inspection of AMERICAN PACKAGING CORPORATION in 850 W. JAMES STREET, COLUMBUS, WI 53925 (NAICS 323112). OSHA activity number 313130833.
What this inspection record means
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Watch American Packaging Corporation — free
Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for American Packaging Corporation is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- AMERICAN PACKAGING CORPORATION
- Site address
- 850 W. JAMES STREET
- City
- COLUMBUS
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53925
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Referral (C)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 323112
- SIC code (legacy)
- 2759
- Employees
- 230
- Ownership type
- A
- Industry flags
- Manufacturing safety.
Citations
49 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.119 C01
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2010
- Abate by
- Apr 29, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $2,250 · Current $2,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(c)(1): The employer did not develop a written plan of action regarding the implementation of the employee participation required by 29 CFR 1910.119: The employer did not have a written plan of action describing how employee participation would be implemented in the Process Safety Management system for the Renzmann Wash Units and RHS solvent distillation system.
Recent events (2)
- — F (O) $2000.00
- — Z (S) $2250.00
1910.119 C02
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2010
- Abate by
- Oct 29, 2011
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(c)(2): The employer did not consult with employees and their representative on the conduct and development of process hazards analyses and on the development of the other elements of process safety management in this standard: The employer did not consult with employees on the development of the elements of the Process Safety Management program for the Renzmann Wash Units and the RHS Distillation System.ation
Recent events (2)
- — F (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.119 D03 IB
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2010
- Abate by
- Apr 29, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $2,250
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i)(B): Process safety information pertaining to the equipment in the process did not include the piping and instrument diagrams (P&ID'S): The employer did not ensure that the process safety information depicted on the P&IDs was accurate and up-to-date. a) The P&ID provided indicated the presence of two flame arresters, one on the dirty solvent tank, one on the clean solvent tank, which were not present. b) The P&ID provided did not indicate the piping associated with the incoming Ethyl Acetate from the bulk off loading area, and subsequently connecting to the Ink Room. c) The P&ID provided did not include the LEL detector located in the ventilation duct work to the oxidizer that interlocks the controls for operation of the Renzmann Wash Units.nn
Recent events (2)
- — F (S)
- — Z (S) $2250.00
1910.119 D03 IG
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2010
- Abate by
- Apr 29, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $2,250
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i)(G): Process safety information pertaining to the equipment did not include the material and energy balances for processes built after May 26, 1992: The employers process safety information did not include a material and energy balance for its process safety management covered process, in that, compositions, mass flow rates, temperatures and pressures were not shown for all major process flow lines.
Recent events (2)
- — F (S)
- — Z (S) $2250.00
1910.119 E01
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2010
- Abate by
- Oct 29, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500 · Current $6,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(e)(1): The process hazard analysis was not appropriate to the complexity of the process and did not identify, evaluate, and address the control of the hazards involved in the process: The Process Hazard Analysis (PHA) conducted under a What If methodology, did not address all the potential hazards and necessary safeguards and controls in the Wash Area process. a) The PHA did not address human factors; b) The PHA did not address previous incidents; c) The PHA did not address facility siting; d) The PHA did not address failure of solvent cooling system for solvent entering the Renzmann; e) The PHA did not address failure of engineering controls, such as, but not limited to, failure of the general ventilation; f) The PHA did not address piping failure at various points throughout the process; g) The PHA did not address a fire in the process area.
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $6000.00
- — Z (S) $4500.00
1910.119 E04
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2010
- Abate by
- Apr 29, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(e)(4): The team performing the process hazard analyses did not include at least one employee who had experience and knowledge specific to the process being evaluated: The process hazard analyses team did not include at least one employee with experience and knowledge specific to the Wash Room Renzmann Wash units and RHS distillation system.
Recent events (2)
- — F (S)
- — Z (S) $4500.00
1910.119 F04
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2010
- Abate by
- Apr 29, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(f)(4): The employer did not develop and implement safe work practices for employees and contractor employees to provide for the control of hazards during operations such as lockout/tagout; confined space entry; opening process equipment or piping; and control over entrance into a facility by maintenance, contractor, laboratory, or other support personnel: Safe work practices were not established for the control of hazards during operations associated with the Renzmann Wash Units and RHS Distillation System. a) Lockout/Tagout machine specific procedures were not implemented during the inspection and maintenance of the spray nozzles for the Renzmann Wash Unit. b) Procedures for safe Permit Required Confined Space entry were not developed and implemented for entry into the Renzmann Wash Units. c) Hot work permit procedures were not developed and implemented that required hot work to be permitted only under supervision of an individual in responsible charge.ible
Recent events (2)
- — F (S)
- — Z (S) $4500.00
1910.119 H02 V
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2010
- Abate by
- Oct 29, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500 · Current $2,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(h)(2)(v): The employer did not periodically evaluate the performance of contract employers in fulfilling their obligations as specified in 29 CFR 1910.119(h)(3): The employer did not periodically evaluate the performance of contract employers in fulfilling their obligations for contract work in the Wash Area. a) The employer did not periodically evaluate the performance of Sheet Metal Specialties. b) The employer did not periodically evaluate the performance of Boldt Construction.
Recent events (2)
- — F (O) $2000.00
- — Z (S) $4500.00
1910.119 J03
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2010
- Abate by
- Apr 29, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(3): The employer did not train each employee involve in maintaining the on-going mechanical integrity of process equipment in an overview of that process and its hazards and in the procedures applicable to the employee's job tasks to assure that the employee can perform the job tasks in a safe manner: Employees were not trained on the hazards and procedures to safely perform their job tasks related to maintaining the process equipment in the Wash Area. a) Employees were not trained on how to properly utilize monitoring devices such as, but not limited to, the Lower Explosive Limit detectors when evaluating hazardous atmospheres inside the Renzmann Wash Units. b) Employees were not trained on the procedures for safe Permit Required Confined Space Entry into the Renzmann Wash Units during inspection and repair of the inside piping. c) Employees were not trained on Control of Hazardous Energy procedures during the inspection and repair of the piping inside Renzmann Wash Units.nn
Recent events (2)
- — F (S)
- — Z (S) $4500.00
1910.119 J04 II
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2010
- Abate by
- Oct 29, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500 · Current $6,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(4)(ii): Inspections and testing procedures performed on process equipment to maintain its mechanical integrity, did not follow recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices: The employer did not follow the manufacturer's recommended inspection and testing procedures. a) Sihi vacuum pump, model LEM40 was not lubricated, and inspected per the manufacturer's recommendations. b) The Fike 3" rupture disk was not replaced per the manufacturer's recommendations.
Recent events (2)
- — F (O) $6000.00
- — Z (S) $4500.00
1910.119 L01
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2010
- Abate by
- Oct 29, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500 · Current $6,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(l)(1): The employer did not establish and implement written procedures to manage changes to process chemicals, technology, equipment, and procedures; and, changes to facilities that affect a covered process: The employer did not implement the established procedures for managing changes to equipment in the Wash Area. a) The employer did not implement the procedure to manage the change of the installation of the Lower Explosive Limit detector in the exhaust duct from the Renzmann Wash Unit. b) The employer did not implement the procedure to manage the change of the disconnection of the cooling water system for the Distillation Unit's hot oil heater. c) The employer did not implement the procedure to manage the change of the installation of an audible alarm for the Distillation Unit's quench system.
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $6000.00
- — Z (S) $4500.00
1910.119 O01
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2010
- Abate by
- Oct 29, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $6,300 · Current $2,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.119(o)(1): The employer did not certify that they had evaluated compliance with the provisions of 29 CFR 1910.119 at least every three years to verify that the procedures and practices developed under this standard were adequate and are being followed: The employer did not evaluate that their safety program and practices complied with the provisions of the Process Safety Management standard.
Recent events (2)
- — F (O) $2000.00
- — Z (S) $6300.00
1910.120 Q02 II
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2010
- Abate by
- Oct 29, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.120(q)(2)(ii): The emergency response plan did not address, to the extent not addressed elsewhere, the personnel roles, lines of authority, training and communication: The emergency response plan did not clearly define the following: a) A list of titles and expected roles and responsibilities for employees and outside agencies responding to emergencies; b) A explanation of the lines of authority for internal personnel and external responders; c) A general outline of training to be covered that will ensure that training meets the requirements for the level of response for employees expected to respond to chemical releases including, but not limited to: Incident Command, Hazardous Materials Technician, and First Responder Operations Level; d) A means and method for communication during an emergency such as, but not limited to: two-way radios, cellular telephones, internal land line phones, pagers.
Recent events (2)
- — F (S)
- — Z (S) $4500.00
1910.120 Q02 V
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2010
- Abate by
- Oct 29, 2011
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.120(q)(2)(v): The emergency response plan did not address, to the extent not addressed elsewhere, the site security and control: The emergency response plan does not address the personnel responsible for, or the procedures and equipment for, site security and control during an emergency response chemical release.
Recent events (2)
- — F (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.120 Q02 VII
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2010
- Abate by
- Oct 29, 2011
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.120(q)(2)(vii): The emergency response plan did not address, to the extent not addressed elsewhere, decontamination: The employer did not develop procedures for decontamination of response personnel, support personnel, the contaminated area and equipment that have become contaminated with hazardous materials from a chemical spill or release.
Recent events (2)
- — F (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.120 Q03 IV
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2010
- Abate by
- Apr 29, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.120(q)(3)(iv): Positive-pressure self-contained breathing apparatus was not worn by employees engaged in emergency response and exposed to hazardous substances presenting an inhalation hazard or potential inhalation hazard, until such time that the individual in charge of the ICS determined through the use of air monitoring that a decreased level of respiratory protection would not result in hazardous exposures to employees: The equipment to be used by the employees who may respond to a potential chemical release, is not appropriate for the hazards present.
Recent events (2)
- — F (S)
- — Z (S) $4500.00
1910.120 Q06 II
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2010
- Abate by
- Oct 29, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500 · Current $6,000
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.120(q)(6)(ii): First responders at the operational level did not receive at least eight hours of training or have had sufficient experience to objectively demonstrate competency specified in paragraphs (q)(6)(ii)(A) through (q)(6)(ii)(F): Employees that took defensive actions at a chemical release (such as, but not limited to, containing and confining hazardous materials) have not been trained to the First Responder Operations level.ions
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $6000.00
- — Z (S) $4500.00
1910.120 Q06 III
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2010
- Abate by
- Apr 29, 2010
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.120(q)(6)(iii): Hazardous Material Technicians did not received at least 24 hours of training or have had sufficient experience to objectively demonstrate competency specified in paragraphs (q)(6)(iiI)(A) through (q)(6)(iii)(I): Employees that took aggressive actions at a chemical release (such as, but not limited to, containing, plugging, patching, transferring, absorbing and diking hazardous materials) have not been trained to the Hazardous Materials Technician level.cian
Recent events (2)
- — F (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.120 Q06 V
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2010
- Abate by
- Oct 29, 2011
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.120(q)(6)(v): On scene incident commanders did not receive at least 24 hours of training equal to the first responder operations level and in addition have the competency specified in paragraphs (q)(6)(v)(A) through (q)(6)(v)(F): Employees expected to supervise other employees responding at a chemical release (such as, but not limited to, containing, plugging, patching, transferring, absorbing and diking hazardous materials) have not been trained to on scene incident commander level.der
Recent events (2)
- — F (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.120 Q09 I
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2010
- Abate by
- Oct 29, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $3,150 · Current $2,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.120(q)(9)(i): Members of an organized and designated HAZMAT team and hazardous materials specialists did not receive a baseline physical examination and were not provided with medical surveillance as required in 29 CFR 1910.120(f): Employees authorized to respond to emergency chemical releases have not received a baseline physical examination or medical surveillance.
Recent events (2)
- — F (O) $2000.00
- — Z (S) $3150.00
1910.146 C02
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2010
- Abate by
- Apr 29, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(c)(2): The employer did not inform exposed employees, by posting danger signs or by any other equally effective means, of the existence and location of and the danger posed by the permit spaces: Employees performing permit-required confined space entries into the Renzmann Wash Units were not aware the Renzmann Wash Units were Permit Required confined spaces. There were no signs posted or other effective means provided to inform the affected employees.
Recent events (2)
- — F (S)
- — Z (S) $4500.00
1910.146 D03
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2010
- Abate by
- Apr 29, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(d)(3): Under the permit-required confined space program required by 29 CFR 1910.146(c)(4), the employer did not develop and implement the means, procedures, and practices necessary for safe permit space entry operations, including but not limited to, the requirements specified in 29 CFR 1910.146(d)(3)(i) through 29 CFR 1910.146(d)(3)(vi): The employer did not develop and implement procedures and practices necessary for safe permit space entry into the Renzmann Wash Units in the Wash Area, including but not limited to, specifying acceptable entry conditions; providing each authorized entrant or that employee's authorized representative with the opportunity to observe any monitoring or testing of permit spaces; isolating the permit space; purging, inerting, flushing, or ventilating the permit space as necessary to eliminate or control atmospheric hazards; providing pedestrian, vehicle, or other barriers as necessary to protect entrants from external hazards; and verifying that conditions in the permit space are acceptable for entry throughout the duration of an authorized entry.ized
Recent events (2)
- — F (S)
- — Z (S) $4500.00
1910.146 D04
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2010
- Abate by
- Apr 29, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(d)(4): The employer did not provide the equipment, specified in paragraphs (d)(4)(i) through (d)(4)(ix) of this section, at no cost to employees, maintain that equipment properly, and ensure that employees use that equipment properly: The employer did not provide the necessary equipment and ensure the equipment was used properly for safe permit space entry into the Renzmann Wash Units in the Wash Area. Equipment necessary includes but is not limited to, atmospheric testing and monitoring equipment to assess employee exposures to oxygen, LEL and toxic vapors; ventilating equipment needed to obtain acceptable entry conditions; communications equipment; personal protective equipment; barriers and shields to protect the entrants; and rescue and emergency equipment.
Recent events (2)
- — F (S)
- — Z (S) $4500.00
1910.146 D05 I
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2010
- Abate by
- Apr 29, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(d)(5)(i): Under the permit-required confined space program required by 29 CFR 1910.146(c)(4), the employer did not evaluate permit space conditions when entry operations were conducted by testing conditions in the permit space to determine if acceptable entry conditions existed before entry was authorized to begin: The employer did not test the conditions inside the Renzmann Wash Units to determine if acceptable entry conditions existed before employee entry was authorized.
Recent events (2)
- — F (S)
- — Z (S) $4500.00
1910.146 D08
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2010
- Abate by
- Apr 29, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(d)(8): Under the permit-required confined space program required by 29 CFR 1910.146(c)(4), the employer did not designate the persons who were to have active roles in entry operations, identify the duties of each such employee, and did not provide each such employee with the training required by 29 CFR 1910.146(g): The employer did not designate, identify duties or train the employees who were to be the entrant(s), attendant(s) or supervisor(s) when entering the Renzmann Wash Units in the Wash area.
Recent events (2)
- — F (S)
- — Z (S) $4500.00
1910.146 D09
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2010
- Abate by
- Apr 29, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(d)(9): Under the permit-required confined space program required by 29 CFR 1910.146(c)(4), the employer did not develop and implement procedures for summoning rescue and emergency services, for rescuing entrants from permit spaces, for providing necessary emergency services to rescued employees, and for preventing unauthorized personnel from attempting a rescue: The employer did not develop and implement procedures or practices for emergency response and rescue for rescuing entrants from the Renzmann Wash Unit in the Wash area.
Recent events (2)
- — F (S)
- — Z (S) $4500.00
1910.146 D10
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2010
- Abate by
- Apr 29, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.146(d)(10): Under the permit-required confined space program required by 29 CFR 1910.146(c)(4), the employer did not develop and implement a system for the preparation, issuance, use, and cancellation of entry permits as required by 29 CFR 1910.146: The employer did not develop and implement a entry permit system for employees performing permit required entry into the Renzmann Wash Unit in the Wash area.
Recent events (2)
- — F (S)
- — Z (S) $4500.00
1910.147 D04 I
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2010
- Abate by
- Oct 29, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(d)(4)(i): Lock out or tagout devices were not affixed to each energy isolating device by authorized employees: Employee(s) performing maintenance work on the Renzmann Wash Units did not affix a lockout device to an energy isolating device.ng
Recent events (2)
- — F (S)
- — Z (S) $4500.00
1910.147 C05 IID
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2010
- Abate by
- Apr 26, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $2,250
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(5)(ii)(D): Lockout/tagout devices did not indicate the identity of the employee applying the device(s): The padlock and tag utilized to Lockout/tagout the power to the Renzmann Wash Unit in the Wash Area did not indicate the identity of the employee applying the device.
Recent events (2)
- — F (S)
- — Z (S) $2250.00
1910.147 C06 IA
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2010
- Abate by
- Apr 29, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(6)(i) (A): The periodic inspection of the energy control procedure was not performed by an authorized employee other than the one utilizing the energy control procedure being inspected: The periodic inspection of energy control procedures was performed by the same person utilizing the energy control procedure being inspected.
Recent events (2)
- — F (S)
- — Z (S) $4500.00
1910.1200 H03 I
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2010
- Abate by
- Apr 29, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500
General-duty citation text
29 CFR 1910.1200(h)(3)(i): Employee training shall include methods and observations that may be used to detect the presence or release of a hazardous chemical in the work area, such as monitoring conducted by the employer, continuous monitoring devices, visual appearance or odor of hazardous chemicals when being released: The employer did not train maintenance employees performing hot work operations in a Class 1, Division 1 and Division 2 locations on the proper use of combustible gas detectors.
Recent events (2)
- — F (S)
- — Z (S) $4500.00
1910.119 D03 IB
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2010
- Abate by
- Oct 29, 2011
- Penalty
- Current $6,500
Recent events (3)
- — Q $2250.00
- — F (S) $6500.00
- — Z (S) $2250.00
1910.119 D03 IG
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2010
- Abate by
- Apr 29, 2010
Recent events (2)
- — F (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.119 F04
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2010
- Abate by
- Oct 29, 2011
- Penalty
- Current $6,000
Recent events (3)
- — Q $4500.00
- — F (S) $6000.00
- — Z (S) $4500.00
1910.119 J03
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2010
- Abate by
- Oct 29, 2011
Recent events (3)
- — Q $4500.00
- — F (S)
- — Z (S) $4500.00
1910.1200 H03 I
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2010
- Abate by
- Apr 29, 2010
Recent events (3)
- — Q $4500.00
- — F (S)
- — Z (S) $4500.00
1910.120 Q02 II
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2010
- Abate by
- Oct 29, 2011
- Penalty
- Current $6,000
Recent events (3)
- — Q $4500.00
- — F (S) $6000.00
- — Z (S) $4500.00
1910.120 Q02 V
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2010
- Abate by
- Oct 29, 2011
Recent events (2)
- — F (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.120 Q02 VII
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2010
- Abate by
- Apr 29, 2010
Recent events (2)
- — F (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.120 Q03 IV
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2010
- Abate by
- Oct 29, 2011
Recent events (3)
- — Q $4500.00
- — F (S)
- — Z (S) $4500.00
1910.146 D03
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2010
- Abate by
- Oct 29, 2011
- Penalty
- Current $6,000
Recent events (3)
- — Q $4500.00
- — F (S) $6000.00
- — Z (S) $4500.00
1910.146 D04
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2010
- Abate by
- Oct 29, 2011
Recent events (3)
- — Q $4500.00
- — F (S)
- — Z (S) $4500.00
1910.146 D05 I
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2010
- Abate by
- Oct 29, 2011
Recent events (3)
- — Q $4500.00
- — F (S)
- — Z (S) $4500.00
1910.146 D08
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2010
- Abate by
- Oct 29, 2011
Recent events (3)
- — Q $4500.00
- — F (S)
- — Z (S) $4500.00
1910.146 D09
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2010
- Abate by
- Oct 29, 2011
Recent events (3)
- — Q $4500.00
- — F (S)
- — Z (S) $4500.00
1910.146 D10
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2010
- Abate by
- Oct 29, 2011
Recent events (3)
- — Q $4500.00
- — F (S)
- — Z (S) $4500.00
1910.147 D04 I
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2010
- Abate by
- Apr 29, 2010
- Penalty
- Current $6,000
Recent events (3)
- — Q $4500.00
- — F (S) $6000.00
- — Z (S) $4500.00
1910.147 C05 IID
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2010
- Abate by
- Oct 29, 2011
Recent events (3)
- — Q $2250.00
- — F (S)
- — Z (S) $2250.00
1910.147 C06 IA
- Issued
- Apr 16, 2010
- Abate by
- Apr 29, 2010
Recent events (3)
- — Q $4500.00
- — F (S)
- — Z (S) $4500.00
More inspections at American Packaging Corporation
May 1, 2025
CEDAR CITY, UT
Oct 29, 2018
STORY CITY, IA
Nov 13, 2012
COLUMBUS, WI
Sep 18, 2012
COLUMBUS, WI
Oct 19, 2009
COLUMBUS, WI
View American Packaging Corporation's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 323112)
Jun 2, 2026
111356 - Advanced WEB Technologies · MINNEAPOLIS, MN
Mar 19, 2026
110893 - Printware LLC · SAINT PAUL, MN
Dec 18, 2025
110443 - PRO Label MN LLC · MINNEAPOLIS, MN
Jun 4, 2025
109270 - Anagram International INC · EDEN PRAIRIE, MN
Apr 24, 2025
109113 - ID Technology LLC · SOUTH SAINT PAUL, MN
More inspections in WI
Jul 17, 2026
PTS Contractors, INC. · GREEN BAY, WI
Jul 16, 2026
Miron Construction CO. INC. · WAUSAU, WI
Jul 15, 2026
Wabash National Services, L.P. · ELROY, WI
Jul 15, 2026
Kings Superior Construction LLC · SUSSEX, WI
Jul 15, 2026
Teronomy Builders, INC. · DELAVAN, WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 313130833.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.