Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: CITY BREWING COMPANY LLC

Complaint inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint health inspection of CITY BREWING COMPANY LLC in 925 S. 3RD STREET, LA CROSSE, WI 54601 (NAICS 312120). OSHA activity number 313137804.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch City Brewing Company LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for City Brewing Company LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
925 S. 3RD STREET
City
LA CROSSE
State
WI
ZIP
54601
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
Y
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
312120
SIC code (legacy)
2082
Employees
500
Ownership type
A

24 citations on file for this inspection.

1910.119 C02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 500 exposed
Issued
Sep 14, 2011
Abate by
Nov 15, 2011
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $4,900 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(c)(2):   The employer did not consult with employees and
their representatives
on the conduct and development of process hazards analyses and on the
development of the other
elements of process safety management in this standard:
The employer did not consult with Ammonia Refrigeration Mechanics and
Power Plant
Operators on the development of the elements of process safety management.
ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED PER 29 CFR 1903.19(d)ION
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4900.00
  • — Z (S) $7000.00

1910.119 D03 IB

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 500 exposed
Issued
Sep 14, 2011
Abate by
Jan 31, 2012
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $4,900 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(i)(B):  Process safety information pertaining to the
equipment in the
process did not include the piping and instrument diagrams (P&ID'S):
The P&IDs for the ammonia refrigeration system were not accurate to the as
built condition of
the system, including but not limited to:
a) Frick #1 compressor, 1 1/2" LIOC line;
b) Frick #1 compressor, 1/2" PO line;
c) Frick #1 compressor, pressure relief valve on shell and tube oil cooler;
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4900.00
  • — Z (S) $7000.00

1910.119 D03 II

Serious Gravity 10 3 instances 500 exposed
Issued
Sep 14, 2011
Abate by
Oct 31, 2013
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $4,900 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(d)(3)(ii):  The employer did not document that the
equipment in the process
complied with recognized and generally accepted good engineering practices:
The employer did not document that the equipment in process complied with
recognized and
generally accepted good engineering practices.
a) Nameplates or labels were not affixed to the Vilter compressors.
b) No provisions were provided for irrigation facilities for eyes near the
rooftop condensers.
c) Compressors and boilers are located in vicinity of each other.
ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED PER 29 CFR 1903.19(d)ION
Recent events (3)
  • — P (S) $4900.00
  • — I (S) $4900.00
  • — Z (S) $7000.00

1910.119 E05

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 500 exposed
Issued
Sep 14, 2011
Abate by
Sep 19, 2011
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $4,900 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(e)(5): The employer did not establish a system to promptly
address the team's
findings and recommendations; assure that the recommendations are resolved
in a timely manner
and that the resolution is documented; document what actions are to be
taken; complete actions
as soon as possible; develop a written schedule of when these actions are
to be completed;
communicate the actions to operating, maintenance and other employees
whose work assignment
are in the process and who may be affected by the recommendations or
actions:
The employer did not establish a system to promptly address the process
hazard
analysis team's
findings and recommendations; assure that the recommendations were
resolved in a timely
manner and that the resolution was documented; document what actions were
taken; complete
actions as soon as possible; developed a written schedule of when these
actions were to be
completed; communicated the actions to operating, maintenance and other
employees whose
work assignment are in the process and who may be affected by the
recommendations or actions.
a) 2006 Process Hazard Analysis Recommendations
b) 2008 Process Hazard Analysis Recommendations
ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED PER 29 CFR 1903.19(d)ION
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4900.00
  • — Z (S) $7000.00

1910.119 H02 I

Serious Gravity 05 1 instance 500 exposed
Issued
Sep 14, 2011
Abate by
Sep 27, 2011
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $2,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(h)(2)(i):  The employer, when selecting a contractor, did
not obtain and
evaluate information regarding the contract employer's safety performance
and programs:
The employer did not obtain and evaluate information regarding Modern
Mechanical,
LLC, safety performance.
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $2500.00
  • — Z (S) $5000.00

1910.119 I01

Serious Gravity 10 5 instances 500 exposed
Issued
Sep 14, 2011
Abate by
Oct 15, 2011
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $4,900 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(i)(1):  The employer did not perform a pre-startup safety
review for modified
facilities when the modification was significant enough to require a
change in the process safety
information:
The employer did not perform a pre-startup safety review for modifications
to the ammonia
refrigeration system facilities that require a change to the process
safety information.
a) Installation of new flooded air handlers in government cellars
b) Recirculation package and evaporator installed in #74 Cellar
c) Installation of Condensers #5 and #6.
d) Glycol Chiller - Loop A - The replacement of the control group, float
sensor replaced,
backflow preventer installed, PLC installed, oil pot installed, new
pressure relief valve installed.
ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED PER 29 CFR 1903.19(d)ION
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4900.00
  • — Z (S) $7000.00

1910.119 J02

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 4 instances 500 exposed
Issued
Sep 14, 2011
Abate by
Sep 27, 2011
Penalty
Initial $7,000
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(2):  The employer did not establish and implement
written
procedures to
maintain the on-going mechanical integrity of process equipment:
The employer did not establish written procedures to maintain the on-going
mechanical integrity
of the ammonia refrigeration system.
a) Inspection, maintaining and replacing relief devices.
b) Inspection and testing on the Vilter compressor safety cutout switches.
ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED PER 29 CFR 1903.19(d)ION
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S)
  • — Z (S) $7000.00

1910.119 J04 I

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 500 exposed
Issued
Sep 14, 2011
Abate by
Sep 27, 2011
Penalty
Initial $7,000
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(4)(i):  Inspections and tests were not performed on
process equipment to
maintain its mechanical integrity:
Inspections and tests were not performed on the ammonia refrigeration
process equipment to
maintain its mechanical integrity.
a) Vilter reciprocating compressor, high pressure safety cut outs
b) Vilter reciprocating compressor, low suction safety cut out
c) Inspection of external conditions including vent lines for pressure
relief devices
d) Testing of all solenoid valves
e) Inspection of seals on normally open valves
f) Inspection and cleaning of filters and strainers
g) York vertical compressor inspection, per manufacturer's service manual
ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED PER 29 CFR 1903.19(d)ION
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S)
  • — Z (S) $7000.00

1910.119 J04 II

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 500 exposed
Issued
Sep 14, 2011
Abate by
Sep 27, 2011
Penalty
Initial $7,000
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(4)(ii):  Inspections and testing procedures performed
on process equipment
to maintain its mechanical integrity, did not follow recognized and
generally accepted good
engineering practices:
The employer did not follow recognized and generally accepted good
engineering
practices when they pressure-tested the piping on the glycol chiller
control unit piping
with anhydrous ammonia gas.
ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED PER 29 CFR 1903.19(d)ION
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S)
  • — Z (S) $7000.00

1910.119 J05

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 500 exposed
Issued
Sep 14, 2011
Abate by
Nov 30, 2012
Penalty
Initial $7,000
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5):  The employer did not correct deficiencies in
equipment that were
outside acceptable limits (as defined by process information in 29 CFR
1910.119(d) before
further use or in a safe and timely manner:
The employer did not correct deficiencies in the ammonia refrigeration
equipment that were
outside acceptable limits before further use or in a safe and timely
manner.
a) Rusted, pitted and corroded piping were in use in various areas
including, but not limited to,
Loop A Chiller, Loop B Chiller, Loop C Chiller, oil knock out pots for
Vilter compressors,
liquid ammonia line to the Keg Room.
b) Pressure relief valves were not replaced at least every 5 years in
various areas, including but
not limited to, Beer Cooler 7 oil pot, Loop B Chiller oil pot, Loop C
Chiller oil pot, Cooler 6
oil pot.
ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED PER 29 CFR 1903.19(d)ION
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S)
  • — Z (S) $7000.00

1910.119 L01

Serious Gravity 10 5 instances 500 exposed
Issued
Sep 14, 2011
Abate by
Sep 27, 2011
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $4,900 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(l)(1):  The employer did not establish and implement
written procedures to
manage changes to process chemicals, technology, equipment, and
procedures; and, changes to
facilities that affect a covered process:
The employer did not conduct a management of change to manage changes to
the ammonia
refrigeration system.
a) 8A Header removal
b) Removal of Condenser #11
c) Removal of two air handling units in Cellar 69
d) Removal of Condenser #7, #8, #9 and #10
e) Throughput changes for the system.
ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED PER 29 CFR 1903.19(d)ION
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4900.00
  • — Z (S) $7000.00

1910.119 O01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 500 exposed
Issued
Sep 14, 2011
Abate by
Sep 27, 2011
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $4,900 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.119(o)(1):  The employer did not certify that they had
evaluated compliance with
the provisions of 29 CFR 1910.119 at least every three years to verify
that
the procedures and
practices developed under this standard were adequate and are being
followed:
The employer had not conducted a compliance audit on the ammonia
refrigeration
system.
ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED PER 29 CFR 1903.19(d)ION
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $4900.00
  • — Z (S) $7000.00

1910.120 Q01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 500 exposed
Issued
Sep 14, 2011
Abate by
Aug 31, 2014
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $4,900 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.120(q)(1): An emergency response plan was not developed and
implemented to
handle anticipated emergencies prior to the commencement of emergency
response operations.
An emergency response plan was not implemented to handle anticipated
emergencies
involving the release of anhydrous ammonia.
ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED PER 29 CFR 1903.19(d)ION
Recent events (3)
  • — P (S) $4900.00
  • — I (S) $4900.00
  • — Z (S) $7000.00

1910.120 Q06 IIIA

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 500 exposed
Issued
Sep 14, 2011
Abate by
Sep 27, 2011
Penalty
Initial $7,000
29 CFR 1910.120(q)(6)(iii)(A): Employees who participated or were expected
to participate, as
hazardous material technicians had not received at least 24 hours of
training equal to the first
responder operations level and/or had not been certified as having such
training and/or in
addition did not have competency to know how to implement the employer's
emergency response
plan:
Employees who were expected to respond in an emergency response as
hazardous
material technicians had not received training nor could demonstrate
competency.
ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED PER 29 CFR 1903.19(d)ION
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S)
  • — Z (S) $7000.00

1910.120 Q06 V

Deleted Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 500 exposed
Issued
Sep 14, 2011
Abate by
Sep 27, 2011
Penalty
Initial $7,000
29 CFR 1910.120(q)(6)(v): The incident commander did not receive at least
24 hours of training
equal to the first responder operations level and in addition have the
competency specified in
paragraphs (q)(6)(v)(A) through (q)(6)(v)(F):
Employees who were expected to respond in an emergency response as the
incident
commander had not received training nor could demonstrate competency.
ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED PER 29 CFR 1903.19(d)ION
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S)
  • — Z (S) $7000.00

1910.147 C04 I

Serious Gravity 05 1 instance 3 exposed
Issued
Sep 14, 2011
Abate by
Jan 13, 2014
Penalty
Initial $5,000 · Current $2,500 Reduced
29 CFR 1910.147(c)(4)(i): Procedures were not developed, documented and
utilized for the
control of potentially hazardous energy when employees were engaged in
activities covered by
this section:
The employer did not develop machine specific lockout/tagout procedures
for the
ammonia refrigeration evaporators/cooling units.
ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED PER 29 CFR 1903.19(c)ION
Recent events (3)
  • — P (S) $2500.00
  • — I (S) $2500.00
  • — Z (S) $5000.00

1910.119 J02

Serious Gravity 10 4 instances 500 exposed
Issued
Sep 14, 2011
Abate by
Jan 13, 2014
Penalty
Current $4,900
Recent events (4)
  • — Q $7000.00
  • — P (S) $4900.00
  • — I (S) $4900.00

1910.119 J04 I

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 500 exposed
Issued
Sep 14, 2011
Abate by
Apr 30, 2014
Penalty
Initial $7,000
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(4)(i):  Inspections and tests were not performed on
process equipment to
maintain its mechanical integrity:
Inspections and tests were not performed on the ammonia refrigeration
process equipment to
maintain its mechanical integrity.
a) Vilter reciprocating compressor, high pressure safety cut outs
b) Vilter reciprocating compressor, low suction safety cut out
c) Inspection of external conditions including vent lines for pressure
relief devices
d) Testing of all solenoid valves
e) Inspection of seals on normally open valves
f) Inspection and cleaning of filters and strainers
g) York vertical compressor inspection, per manufacturer's service manual
ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED PER 29 CFR 1903.19(d)ION
Recent events (3)
  • — P (S)
  • — I (S)
  • — Z (S) $7000.00

1910.119 J04 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 500 exposed
Issued
Sep 14, 2011
Abate by
Sep 27, 2011
Penalty
Initial $7,000
29 CFR 1910.119(j)(5):  The employer did not correct deficiencies in
equipment that were
outside acceptable limits (as defined by process information in 29 CFR
1910.119(d) before
further use or in a safe and timely manner:
The employer did not correct deficiencies in the ammonia refrigeration
equipment that were
outside acceptable limits before further use or in a safe and timely
manner.
a) Rusted, pitted and corroded piping were in use in various areas
including, but not limited to,
Loop A Chiller, Loop B Chiller, Loop C Chiller, oil knock out pots for
Vilter compressors,
liquid ammonia line to the Keg Room.
b) Pressure relief valves were not replaced at least every 5 years in
various areas, including but
not limited to, Beer Cooler 7 oil pot, Loop B Chiller oil pot, Loop C
Chiller oil pot, Cooler 6
oil pot.
ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED PER 29 CFR 1903.19(d)ION
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S)
  • — Z (S) $7000.00

1910.119 J05

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 500 exposed
Issued
Sep 14, 2011
Abate by
Apr 30, 2014
Penalty
Initial $7,000
Recent events (3)
  • — P (S)
  • — I (S)
  • — Z (S) $7000.00

1910.120 Q06 V

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 500 exposed
Issued
Sep 14, 2011
Abate by
Oct 15, 2012
Penalty
Initial $7,000 · Current $4,900 Reduced
Recent events (3)
  • — P (S) $4900.00
  • — I (S) $4900.00
  • — Z (S) $7000.00

1910.120 Q06 IIIA

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 500 exposed
Issued
Sep 14, 2011
Abate by
Oct 15, 2012
Penalty
Initial $7,000
29 CFR 1910.120(q)(6)(iii)(A): Employees who participated or were expected
to participate, as
hazardous material technicians had not received at least 24 hours of
training equal to the first
responder operations level and/or had not been certified as having such
training and/or in
addition did not have competency to know how to implement the employer's
emergency response
plan:
Employees who were expected to respond in an emergency response as
hazardous
material technicians had not received training nor could demonstrate
competency.
ABATEMENT DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED PER 29 CFR 1903.19(d)ION
Recent events (3)
  • — P (S)
  • — I (S)
  • — Z (S) $7000.00

1910.1001 J03 V

Other-than-serious Gravity 01 2 instances 11 exposed
Issued
Sep 14, 2011
Abate by
Oct 31, 2011
29 CFR 1910.1001(j)(3)(v): At the entrance to mechanical rooms/areas in
which employees
reasonably can be expected to enter and which contain ACM and/or PACM, the
building owner
did not post signs which identify the material which is present, its
location, and appropriate work
practices which, if followed, will ensure that ACM and/or PACM will not be
disturbed:
The employer did not post signage at the entrance of mechanical
rooms/areas which contain
ACM and/or PACM.
a) Glycol chiller Room/area
b) Compressor Room/area
ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED PER 29 CFR 1903.19(c)ION
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O)
  • — Z (O)

1910.119 F03

Other-than-serious Gravity 01 1 instance 500 exposed
Issued
Sep 14, 2011
Abate by
Mar 31, 2013
29 CFR 1910.119(f)(3):  The employer did not certify annually that the
operating procedures
are current and accurate:
The employer failed to certify on an annual basis that the Ammonia
Refrigeration
Operating Procedures are current and accurate.
ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION REQUIRED PER 29 CFR 1903.19(c)ION
Recent events (3)
  • — P (O)
  • — I (O)
  • — Z (O)

View City Brewing Company LLC's full OSHA safety record →

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 313137804.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.