COSHOCTON, OH —
OSHA Inspection: AK STEEL COSHOCTON WORKS
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of AK STEEL COSHOCTON WORKS in 17400 STATE ROUTE 16, COSHOCTON, OH 43812 (NAICS 331111). OSHA activity number 313150179.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- AK STEEL COSHOCTON WORKS
- Site address
- 17400 STATE ROUTE 16
- City
- COSHOCTON
- State
- OH
- ZIP
- 43812
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Y
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 331111
- SIC code (legacy)
- 3312
- Employees
- 250
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
5 citations on file for this inspection.
1910.303 B02
- Issued
- Dec 1, 2009
- Abate by
- Jan 3, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $2,125 · Current $2,125
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to the following caught in/laceration hazards: a.Employees operating the Bliss 30" Temper Mill, Intermediate Slitter line and Final Slitter line were exposed to hazards such as in-running nip points on the mill in-feed rollers and recoilers, which may cause finger, hand, or arm amputations, and severe cuts, avulsions, and lacerations from sharp edges of the coiled steel. The equipment emergency stop controls were not readily accessible or easily identifiable. The emergency stop controls had shrouds/guards installed around the buttons and the background immediately around the pushbuttons was not colored yellow. A feasible and acceptable abatement would be to ensure: a) that sufficient clearance is maintained so as not to impede the intentional operation of the control. [Sufficient clearance is recognized as a clear surface area of 120mm (diameter centered on the actuator (approx. 4 3/4 inches) with nothing in this area extending above the plane of the actuated (pressed) button.]; and b) that the background immediately around the pushbuttons is colored yellow, in compliance with industry recognized guidelines for the design and installation of emergency stop devices, such as but not limited to: American National Standards Institute (ANSI) B11.18-2006 Safety Requirements for Machines Processing or Slitting Coiled or Non-coiled Metal, Sub Clause 6.3.4.4; American National Standards Institute (ANSI) B11.20 Safety Requirements for Integrated Manufacturing Systems; National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) 79 Electrical Standard for Industrial Machinery, Section 10.7.on
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $2125.00
- — Z (S) $2125.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Dec 1, 2009
- Abate by
- Jan 3, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $1,275 · Current $1,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to struck by hazards while hoisting material: a.In the 30 inch temper mill area, the employer did not mark nor tag the rated load capacity on a c-hook used to move rolls of paper weighing up to 150 pounds. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable method to correct this hazard is to affix data plates to the carriage in accordance with ASME Standard B30.20, Below the Hook Lifting Devices, Section 20-1.2.
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $1000.00
- — Z (S) $1275.00
1910.219 C04 I
- Issued
- Dec 1, 2009
- Abate by
- Jan 3, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $1,275 · Current $1,275
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $1275.00
- — Z (S) $1275.00
1910.219 I01
- Issued
- Dec 1, 2009
- Abate by
- Jan 3, 2010
Recent events (2)
- — F (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.212 A02
- Issued
- Dec 1, 2009
- Abate by
- Jan 3, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $5,000 · Current $1,000 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $1000.00
- — Z (S) $5000.00
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 331111)
More inspections in OH
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 313150179.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.