SPRING VALLEY, WI —
OSHA Inspection: OAK-DALE HARDWOOD PRODUCTS, INC
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of OAK-DALE HARDWOOD PRODUCTS, INC in W121 2ND STREET, SPRING VALLEY, WI 54767 (NAICS 321918). OSHA activity number 313175762.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- OAK-DALE HARDWOOD PRODUCTS, INC
- Site address
- W121 2ND STREET
- City
- SPRING VALLEY
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 54767
- Mailing
- PO BOX 309, SPRING VALLEY, WI 54767
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 321918
- SIC code (legacy)
- 2431
- Employees
- 13
- Ownership type
- A
- Industry flags
- Manufacturing safety.
Citations
22 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Oct 16, 2009
- Abate by
- Jun 1, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $750 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to serious burns from potential dust deflagration, explosion, or other fire hazards as the result of the improper design and maintenance of the dust collection systems: (a)Oak-Dale Hardwood Products, Inc. in Spring Valley, WI: The following deficiencies were found with the Honeyville Metal, Inc. bag house dust collector and associated systems used for collection of hardwood dusts: (1)A means of tramp metal protection was not provided to keep any unwanted metal fragments from entering the air-material separator (bag house). (2)A means of static charge dissipation, such as bonding or grounding was not provided between the air-material separator (bag house) and pieces of equipment which were connected by flexible non-metallic duct work on machinery such as, but no limited to, the IMC straight line rip saw, Northfield radial arm saw, and Medalist double end tenoner. (3)Use of flexible non-metallic duct work exceeded the minimum required for machinery operation on equipment, such as but not limited to, the Northfield radial arm saw and the Medalist double end tenoner. (4)A deflagration isolation or suppression system was not provided between the inlet (dirty air) side of the air-material separator (bag house) and the facility itself. (5)A spark detection system with high speed abort gate or extinguishment capability was not installed downstream of the last material entry points and upstream of the air-material separator (bag house) where machinery having a history of producing sparks, including a large belt sander having an automatic feed system (Durumac wide belt sander), was used. (b)Oak-Dale Hardwood Products, Inc. in Spring Valley, WI: The following deficiencies were found with the Grizzly enclosureless dust collection system associated with the Multicam CNC router: (1)A means of static charge dissipation, such as bonding or grounding, was not provided between the air material separator and the piece of equipment which were connected by flexible non-metallic duct work. (2)The system was located within 20 feet of a means of egress and routinely occupied areas. AMONG OTHER METHODS, ONE FEASIBLE AND ACCEPTABLE MEANS OF ABATEMENT WOULD BE TO COMPLY WITH THE GUIDELINES OUTLINED IN NATIONAL FIRE PROTECTION ASSOCIATION (NFPA) 664 "STANDARD FOR THE PREVENTION OF FIRES AND EXPLOSIONS IN WOOD PROCESSING AND WOODWORKING FACILITIES (2007) EDITION". Abatement certification and documentation are required for this item. Abatement note: Although not determined to be a hazard at the time of the inspection due to the diversion of return air to atmosphere during the warmer months, the employer should note the requirements of NFPA 664 (2007) Section 8.2.2.6 regarding requirements for safely recycling exhausted air and Section 8.2.4 regarding deflagration isolation of the return air (outlet) side from the facility. Abatement Schedule STEP 1 -A combination of administrative controls shall be implemented as an interim protection measure until feasible engineering and administrative controls can be permanently implemented. (Examples may include but are not limited to: frequent and routine housekeeping measures, visual inspection of stock materials for tramp metal, routine visual inspections of duct work for settled dust material or buildup with cleaning scheduled when adverse conditions are detected, movement of personnel from immediate proximity to the South wall and inlet duct work (dirty air) leading to the air-material separator (bag-house), and diversion of the clean air return duct work to outside atmosphere prior to re-entering the facility, and reduction of dust concentration introduced into the dust collection system by strategic planning of equipment run times). STEP 2 -A written, detailed plan of abatement shall be submitted to the Area Director outlining a schedule for the implementation of engineering and/or administrative measures to control employee exposures to the hazardous condition referenced in this citation. This plan shall include, at a minimum, target dates for the following actions which must be consistent with the abatement dates required by this citation: (1)Evaluation of engineering/administrative control options; (2)Selection of optimum control methods and completion of design; (3)Procurement, installation and operation of selected control measures; (4)Testing and acceptance or modification/redesign of controls; All proposed control measures shall be approved for each particular use by a competent certified safety professional, professional engineer, or other technically qualified person. STEP 3 - Abatement shall have been completed by the implementation of feasible engineering and administrative control upon verification of their effectiveness in achieving compliance. Date by Which Violation Must be Abated: STEP - 1 11/13/09 Date by Which Violation Must be Abated: STEP - 2 12/18/09 Date by Which Violation Must be Abated: STEP - 3 01/20/10
Recent events (3)
- — P (S) $750.00
- — I (S) $750.00
- — Z (S) $1500.00
1910.22 A01
- Issued
- Oct 16, 2009
- Abate by
- Nov 12, 2009
- Penalty
- Initial $600 · Current $300 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $300.00
- — Z (S) $600.00
1910.37 A03
- Issued
- Oct 16, 2009
- Abate by
- Oct 21, 2009
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.133 A03
- Issued
- Oct 16, 2009
- Abate by
- Nov 19, 2009
- Penalty
- Initial $600 · Current $300 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $300.00
- — Z (S) $600.00
1910.138 A
- Issued
- Oct 16, 2009
- Abate by
- Nov 19, 2009
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.147 C04 I
- Issued
- Oct 16, 2009
- Abate by
- Dec 11, 2009
- Penalty
- Initial $750 · Current $375 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $375.00
- — Z (S) $750.00
1910.147 C07 I
- Issued
- Oct 16, 2009
- Abate by
- Dec 18, 2009
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.147 D04 I
- Issued
- Oct 16, 2009
- Abate by
- Dec 11, 2009
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.178 L04 III
- Issued
- Oct 16, 2009
- Abate by
- Dec 4, 2009
- Penalty
- Initial $750 · Current $375 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $375.00
- — Z (S) $750.00
1910.178 Q07
- Issued
- Oct 16, 2009
- Abate by
- Nov 12, 2009
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.212 A01
- Issued
- Oct 16, 2009
- Abate by
- Nov 27, 2009
- Penalty
- Initial $750 · Current $375 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $375.00
- — Z (S) $750.00
1910.219 D01
- Issued
- Oct 16, 2009
- Abate by
- Nov 27, 2009
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.219 E01 I
- Issued
- Oct 16, 2009
- Abate by
- Nov 27, 2009
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.219 F01
- Issued
- Oct 16, 2009
- Abate by
- Nov 27, 2009
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.219 F03
- Issued
- Oct 16, 2009
- Abate by
- Nov 27, 2009
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.213 H01
- Issued
- Oct 16, 2009
- Abate by
- Nov 12, 2009
- Penalty
- Initial $750 · Current $375 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $375.00
- — Z (S) $750.00
1910.213 H04
- Issued
- Oct 16, 2009
- Abate by
- Nov 12, 2009
- Penalty
- Initial $2,100 · Current $1,050 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1050.00
- — Z (S) $2100.00
1910.303 B01 IV
- Issued
- Oct 16, 2009
- Abate by
- Nov 12, 2009
- Penalty
- Initial $750 · Current $375 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $375.00
- — Z (S) $750.00
1910.303 B02
- Issued
- Oct 16, 2009
- Abate by
- Nov 12, 2009
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.305 B01
- Issued
- Oct 16, 2009
- Abate by
- Nov 19, 2009
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.305 G02 III
- Issued
- Oct 16, 2009
- Abate by
- Nov 19, 2009
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1904.29 B01
- Issued
- Oct 16, 2009
- Abate by
- Nov 19, 2009
Recent events (2)
- — I (O)
- — Z (O)
More inspections at Oak-Dale Hardwood Products, INC
View Oak-Dale Hardwood Products, INC's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 321918)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 313175762.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.