NEW CUMBERLAND, WV —
OSHA Inspection: AL SOLUTIONS, INC.
Accident-driven inspection · Health discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an accident-driven health inspection of AL SOLUTIONS, INC. in 1000 SOUTH CHESTER STREET, NEW CUMBERLAND, WV 26047 (NAICS 331492). OSHA activity number 313378242.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- AL SOLUTIONS, INC.
- Site address
- 1000 SOUTH CHESTER STREET
- City
- NEW CUMBERLAND
- State
- WV
- ZIP
- 26047
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Accident-driven (A)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Health
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 331492
- SIC code (legacy)
- 3341
- Employees
- 22
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
25 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jun 8, 2011
- Abate by
- Jan 17, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $6,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were likely to cause death or serious physical harm in that the system intended to detect and monitor hydrogen gas was not properly designed, included air intakes located in open process equipment and a sample intake design which allowed for the dilution of samples, and failed to detect flammable hydrogen gas produced during blending and conveying operations or from ignition of wet titanium and zirconium metal fines. As designed the system did not detect the buildup of hydrogen gas that could result in an explosion exposing employees to serious injuries and potential death: (a)Production Building, Blending and Press Room: On or about December 9, 2010 the employer used a hydrogen detection system that was not properly designed in that air intakes were located in open process equipment and a sample intake design allowed for the dilution of samples. The system failed to detect flammable hydrogen gas produced during blending and conveying operations or from ignition of wet titanium and zirconium metal fines. As designed the system did not detect the buildup of hydrogen gas that could result in an explosion exposing employees to serious injuries and potential death. Among other methods, feasible and acceptable abatement methods the hydrogen detection system should be designed to assure sensors and/or sample ports are located inside closed equipment and assure samples are not diluted before they are analyzed. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION AND DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED FOR THIS ITEM
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $6000.00
- — Z (S) $7000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jun 8, 2011
- Abate by
- Jul 25, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that the employer did not provide an over pressurization relief system in the blending and press room in which the potential of a hydrogen gas explosion existed: (a)Production Building, Blending and Press Room: On or about December 9, 2010, no system to limit the pressure buildup from the explosion of hydrogen gas produced during blending and pressing of combustible titanium and zirconium or in the event of a fire of wet titanium and zirconium was present. One feasible and acceptable abatement method is to install an explosion venting system or an explosion suppression system specifically designed for the potential of a hydrogen gas explosion. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION AND DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED FOR THIS ITEM
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $7000.00
- — Z (S) $7000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jun 8, 2011
- Abate by
- Jul 25, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that large quantities of combustible titanium and zirconium metals were stored in an unsafe manner, including storage of the wet metal fines in unvented containers and near open flames, creating the potential for fire and explosion: (a) Warehouse: On or about December 9, 2010 employees of Al Solutions worked in a warehouse containing several hundred barrels of wet titanium and zirconium metal stored in a hazardous manner including, but not limited to, wet metals stored in unvented containers; wet metals stored near open flame heaters, wet metals stored next to cardboard boxes, and containers of wet metals stacked. One feasible and acceptable abatement method is to store all wet combustible metals outside; to store under water in a covered and vented container; to store at least fifty feet away from open flames; and to not stack the containers. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION AND DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED FOR THIS ITEM
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $7000.00
- — Z (S) $7000.00
1910.36 A03
- Issued
- Jun 8, 2011
- Abate by
- Jun 27, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $6,000 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $6000.00
- — Z (S) $7000.00
1910.37 A02
- Issued
- Jun 8, 2011
- Abate by
- Jul 11, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $7000.00
- — Z (S) $7000.00
1910.37 E
- Issued
- Jun 8, 2011
- Abate by
- Jun 20, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $7000.00
- — Z (S) $7000.00
1910.132 A
- Issued
- Jun 8, 2011
- Abate by
- Jul 25, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $7000.00
- — Z (S) $7000.00
1910.133 A01
- Issued
- Jun 8, 2011
- Abate by
- Jun 20, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $7000.00
- — Z (S) $7000.00
1910.151 C
- Issued
- Jun 8, 2011
- Abate by
- Jun 27, 2011
Recent events (2)
- — F (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.178 C02 VII
- Issued
- Jun 8, 2011
- Abate by
- Jun 20, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $6,000 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $6000.00
- — Z (S) $7000.00
1910.178 L02 II
- Issued
- Jun 8, 2011
- Abate by
- Jun 20, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $7000.00
- — Z (S) $7000.00
1910.178 L04 III
- Issued
- Jun 8, 2011
- Abate by
- Jun 20, 2011
Recent events (2)
- — F (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.1200 D01
- Issued
- Jun 8, 2011
- Abate by
- Jan 17, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $6,000 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $6000.00
- — Z (S) $7000.00
1910.1200 H02 II
- Issued
- Jun 8, 2011
- Abate by
- Jun 20, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $7,000
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $7000.00
- — Z (S) $7000.00
1910.1200 H03 I
- Issued
- Jun 8, 2011
- Abate by
- Jun 20, 2011
Recent events (2)
- — F (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.1200 H03 III
- Issued
- Jun 8, 2011
- Abate by
- Jun 20, 2011
Recent events (2)
- — F (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.151 C
- Issued
- Jun 8, 2011
- Abate by
- Jan 17, 2014
- Penalty
- Current $6,000
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $6000.00
- — Z (S)
1910.178 L04 III
- Issued
- Jun 8, 2011
- Abate by
- Jan 17, 2014
- Penalty
- Current $4,000
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $4000.00
- — Z (S)
1910.1200 H03 I
- Issued
- Jun 8, 2011
- Abate by
- Jan 17, 2014
- Penalty
- Current $6,000
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $6000.00
- — Z (S)
1910.1200 H03 III
- Issued
- Jun 8, 2011
- Abate by
- Jan 17, 2014
- Penalty
- Current $6,000
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $6000.00
- — Z (S)
1910.133 A01
- Issued
- Jun 8, 2011
- Abate by
- Jun 20, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $6,000 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $6000.00
- — Z (S) $7000.00
1910.178 L02 II
- Issued
- Jun 8, 2011
- Abate by
- Jan 17, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $4,000 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $4000.00
- — Z (S) $7000.00
1910.1200 H02 II
- Issued
- Jun 8, 2011
- Abate by
- Jan 17, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $6,000 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $6000.00
- — Z (S) $7000.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jun 8, 2011
- Abate by
- Jan 17, 2014
- Penalty
- Initial $70,000 · Current $7,000 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that were likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that the employer used a water suppression system for the control of fires that could result from the presence of highly combustible metals, titanium and zirconium, which were blended, conveyed, and pressed in an environment that was conducive for serious fires because of the existence of large quantities of combustible metals, the presence of ignition sources resulting from the lack of bonding or grounding of metal items, and other spark producing equipment. (a)Production Building, Blending and Press Room: On or about December 9, 2010, a water suppression system for the control of fires was used in the production room where large quantities of highly combustible metals, zirconium and titanium were processed. The application of water to burning combustible metals can result in hydrogen production and explosion. The process of blending, conveying, and pressing combustible titanium and zirconium in the production building was conducive to serious fires. Conditions in the production room which increased the potential for fires included the lack of bonding or grounding of metal items and the use of spark producing tools. One feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to use a sand/salt fire suppression system and to assure that all equipment is protected from static electricity through bonding and grounding of equipment, to assure all non-sealed bearings on processing equipment are lubricated and to eliminate use of spark producing tools. ABATEMENT CERTIFICATION AND DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED FOR THIS ITEM
Recent events (2)
- — F (S) $7000.00
- — Z (W) $70000.00
1904.29 A
- Issued
- Jun 8, 2011
- Abate by
- Jun 20, 2011
Recent events (2)
- — F (O)
- — Z (O)
More inspections at AL Solutions, INC.
View AL Solutions, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 331492)
More inspections in WV
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 313378242.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.