LAS VEGAS, NV ·
OSHA Inspection: NEVADA YELLOW CAB CORPORATION
Planned inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of NEVADA YELLOW CAB CORPORATION in 5225 WEST POST ROAD, LAS VEGAS, NV 89118 (NAICS 485310). OSHA activity number 313442279.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- NEVADA YELLOW CAB CORPORATION
- Site address
- 5225 WEST POST ROAD
- City
- LAS VEGAS
- State
- NV
- ZIP
- 89118
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Planned (H)
- Scope
- Complete (A)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Union (Y)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 485310
- SIC code (legacy)
- 4121
- Employees
- 900
- Ownership type
- Private (A)
- Industry flags
- Manufacturing safety.
Citations
8 citations on file for this inspection.
618037501
- Issued
- Oct 6, 2009
- Abate by
- Nov 8, 2009
- Penalty
- Initial $4,500 · Current $3,150 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Nevada Revised Statute 618.375(1): Duties of employers. The employer failed to furnish employment and a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to his employees: The employer failed to ensure automotive lifts in the shop were properly maintained and operated, as follows: a.The employer did not have operator training documentation for employees using Challenger automotive lifts, as required by ANSI/ALI ALOIM-2008 paragraph 4.3: The owner or employer shall appropriately document operator training by completing the operator training log found in the appendix to this standard. b.The employer did not provide safety warning labels for 6 Challenger automotive lifts, as required by ANSI/ALI ALOIM-2008 paragraph 4.4.4(2): The lift owner or employer shall take all appropriate steps to follow the recommended inspection procedures of the lift manufacturer, but in no event shall the lift operator fail to inspect or take notice on a daily basis of the accessibility and readability of safety warning labels. c.The employer did not ensure that capacity plates on two automotive lifts were readable as required by ANSI/ALI ALOIM-2008 paragraph 4.4.4(3): In no event shall the operator fail to inspect or take notice on a daily basis of the readability of the rated load capacity of the lift. d.The employer did not stop using 4 Challenger automotive lifts after lift leg contact pads were worn off. ANSI/ALI ALOIM-2008 paragraph 4.4.4(7) required the lift operator to inspect on a daily basis damage or excessive wear on any of the lift contact point which engage the vehicle during lifting, whether they engage the tires, frame, body or axles. Paragraph 4.5 required: If any of the conditions described above are observed, the operator shall stop using the lift. Employees were exposed to serious broken bone injuries from vehicle slippage at lift leg contact points. Abated during inspection. e.The employer did not establish a periodic planned maintenance procedure as required by ANSI/ALI ALOIM-2008 paragraph 6.1.1: The owner or employer shall establish a periodic planned maintenance procedure in accordance with the recommendations of the lift manufacturer in order to ensure reliability and allow the continued safe operation of the lift. Abated during inspection. One feasible means of abatement would be to follow the requirements of ANSI/ALI ALOIM- 2008 in order to ensure reliability and allow the continued safe operation of the lift.
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $3150.00
- · Z (S) $4500.00
1910.178 L04 III
- Issued
- Oct 6, 2009
- Abate by
- Oct 9, 2009
- Penalty
- Initial $1,625 · Current $1,138 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1137.50
- · Z (S) $1625.00
1910.215 A04
- Issued
- Oct 6, 2009
- Abate by
- Oct 9, 2009
- Penalty
- Initial $1,625 · Current $1,138 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1137.50
- · Z (S) $1625.00
1910.215 B09
- Issued
- Oct 6, 2009
- Abate by
- Oct 9, 2009
Recent events (2)
- · I (S)
- · Z (S)
1910.303 B02
- Issued
- Oct 6, 2009
- Abate by
- Oct 9, 2009
- Penalty
- Initial $1,625 · Current $1,138 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- · I (S) $1137.50
- · Z (S) $1625.00
1910.304 G05
- Issued
- Oct 6, 2009
- Abate by
- Oct 9, 2009
Recent events (2)
- · I (S)
- · Z (S)
618054001 B
- Issued
- Oct 1, 2009
- Abate by
- Oct 6, 2009
1910.1200 E01 I
- Issued
- Oct 1, 2009
- Abate by
- Oct 6, 2009
More inspections at Nevada Yellow CAB Corporation
View Nevada Yellow CAB Corporation's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 485310)
More inspections in NV
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 313442279.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.