WEST MILWAUKEE, WI —
OSHA Inspection: GALLAND HENNING NOPAK, INC.
Accident-driven inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an accident-driven safety inspection of GALLAND HENNING NOPAK, INC. in 1025 S. 40TH ST., WEST MILWAUKEE, WI 53215 (NAICS 332313). OSHA activity number 313525768.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- GALLAND HENNING NOPAK, INC.
- Site address
- 1025 S. 40TH ST.
- City
- WEST MILWAUKEE
- State
- WI
- ZIP
- 53215
- Mailing
- P.O. BOX 343917, MILWAUKEE, WI 53234
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Accident-driven (A)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Y
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332313
- SIC code (legacy)
- 3443
- Employees
- 56
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
23 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- May 17, 2010
- Abate by
- Jun 30, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $2,500 · Current $1,250 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that: (a)In the north side of High bay, Drill Press Department, Budgit Ton Jib Hoist had the pendant had electrical tape wrapped around the electrical wires. The pendant was not supported in a manner that would protect the electrical conductors exposing employees to electrical hazards. (b)In the Machine Shop by the Drill Press & Chucker Area, Budgit Ton Jib Hoist pendant was not supported in a manner that would protect the electrical conductors. (c)In the Machine Shop by Warner & Swasey Automatic Chucker, Ton Capacity Lodestar Hoist pendant was not supported in a manner that would protect the electrical conductors. Among other methods, feasible and acceptable means to correct these hazards are to use a safer alternate method such as ensure the pendant control was properly supported as outlined in ASME Overhead Hoist (Underhung) B30.16-2003, Section 16-1.2.3(d) a pendant station shall be supported in a manner that will protect the electrical conductors or air hoses against strain. Any pendant station that might present a hazard to the operator, if a ground fault occurs, shall be grounded. Certification, and documentation/evidence of abatement is required. Certification of abatement is required by 29 CFR Part 1903 and is to be submitted within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date.ment
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1250.00
- — Z (S) $2500.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- May 17, 2010
- Abate by
- Jun 19, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $1,250 · Current $625 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that: (a)By the Lathe Electro Cycle, a Ton Budgit hoist was installed on an "I" beam of the building structure without being designed to withstand the loads and forces imposed by the hoist for the rated load, this exposed employees to struck by hazards. Among other methods, feasible and acceptable means to correct these hazards are to use a safer alternate method such as ensure the supporting structure was designed to withstand the loads and forces imposed by the hoist for the rated load as outlined in An American National Standard ASME B30.16-2003 Overhead Hoists (Underhung), Section 16-1.3.2 Support. Certification, with date and method of abatement required. Certification of abatement is required by 29 CFR Part 1903 and is to be submitted within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date.ment
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $625.00
- — Z (S) $1250.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- May 17, 2010
- Abate by
- Jun 19, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $1,250 · Current $625 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that: (a)At the Angle Dock, the 3 Ton P&H Beta Hevi-Lift Overhead Hoist had the wire rope with multiple kinks which was not taken out of service exposing employees to struck by hazards. Among other methods, feasible and acceptable means to correct these hazards are to use a safer alternate method such as implement removal criteria for the rope replacement as outlined in ASME B30.16-2003 Overhead Hoist (Underhung), Section 16-2.4.2 (b)(5): Removal criteria for the rope replacement shall be as follows: kinking, crushing, birdcaging, or any other damage resulting in distortion of the rope structure. Certification, with date and method of abatement required. Certification of abatement is required by 29 CFR Part 1903 and is to be submitted within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date.ment
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $625.00
- — Z (S) $1250.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- May 17, 2010
- Abate by
- Jun 4, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $1,250 · Current $625 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that: (a)Throughout the facility; the employer was using 5 Hero Alloy hooks with chain slings to move steel plates around the shop. The hooks did not have the rated load and other identification. This exposed employees to struck by hazards from falling loads. (b)In the Paint Booth area, the employer was using "S" hooks without having the rated load and other identification. This exposed employees to struck by hazards from falling loads. (c)In the High Bay, the employer had several job made lifting devices (i.e. spreader bar and hooks) used to move various parts without having the rated load and other identification. This exposed employees to struck by hazards from falling loads. Among other methods, feasible and acceptable means to correct these hazards are to use a safer alternate method such as: Follow the American National Standard ASME B30.20-2001 Below the Hook Lifting Devices, Section 20-1.2.1(a) Rated Load. The rated load of the lifting device shall be marked on the main structure where it is visible. If the lifting device is made up of several lifters, each detachable from the group, these lifters shall also be marked with their individual rated loads. Follow the American National Standard ASME B30.20-2001 Below the Hook Lifting Devices, Section 20-1.2.1(b) Identification. A nameplate or other permanent marking shall be affixed displaying the following information: manufacturer's name and address; serial number; lifter weight, if over 100 lb (45 kg); rated load. Certification, with date and method of abatement required. Certification of abatement is required by 29 CFR Part 1903 and is to be submitted within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date.ment
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $625.00
- — Z (S) $1250.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- May 17, 2010
- Abate by
- Jun 4, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $2,500 · Current $2,500
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that: (a)On February 16, 2010; in the yard, a Renfroe Model S Clamp (4 Ton 1 - 2") was used a move a steel plate 1u" thick. This clamp was not used in accordance with the instruction manual in that it was used for vertical lifts and turned into a horizontal lift. Among other methods, feasible and acceptable means to correct these hazards are to use a safer alternate method such as follow the requirements as outlined in: American Society of Mechanical Engineers ASME B30.20a-2001 Below-th-Hook Lifting Device: 20-1.4.4(b) The lifting device shall not be loaded in excess of its rated load or handle any load for which it is not designed. 20-1.4.4(c) The lifter shall be applied to the load in accordance with the instruction manual. Renfroe Model S Clamp Operation and Maintenance Manual: Application S, The model "S" is a vertical lifting clamp and is an effective tool for construction and erection. Operation S, Step 2, Select appropriate capacity and plate thickness. The model designation, capacity, and plate thickness are stenciled on each clamp. WARNING: Never exceed rated capacity or use on plates that are not within the range of plate thickness stenciled on the clamp. Lift only one plat on each lift. Always use a clamp with maximum plate thickness and rated capacity near equal to the thickness and weight of the plate being lifted. Operation S, Step 8, Commence lift. WARNING: The operator should position himself away from and fully clear of the member to be lifted. Do not commence lift until all personnel are clear of the area of the lift. Never stand under or near a member being lifted. Operating Aid, 6. DO Use clamps within their rated capacity. NEVER overload clamp. Certification, and documentation/evidence of abatement is required. Certification of abatement is required by 29 CFR Part 1903 and is to be submitted within ten (10) calendar days after the abatement date.ment
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $2500.00
- — Z (S) $2500.00
1910.132 D02
- Issued
- May 17, 2010
- Abate by
- Oct 31, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $1,000 · Current $500 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $500.00
- — Z (S) $1000.00
1910.147 C01
- Issued
- May 17, 2010
- Abate by
- Jun 19, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $1,250 · Current $1,250
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1250.00
- — Z (S) $1250.00
1910.147 C04 I
- Issued
- May 17, 2010
- Abate by
- Jun 19, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $1,250 · Current $1,250
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1250.00
- — Z (S) $1250.00
1910.147 C07 I
- Issued
- May 17, 2010
- Abate by
- Jun 19, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $1,250 · Current $1,250
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1250.00
- — Z (S) $1250.00
1910.179 B05
- Issued
- May 17, 2010
- Abate by
- Jun 30, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $1,250
Recent events (2)
- — I (O)
- — Z (S) $1250.00
1910.179 E02 I
- Issued
- May 17, 2010
- Abate by
- Jun 4, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $1,250 · Current $1,250
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1250.00
- — Z (S) $1250.00
1910.179 H01 I
- Issued
- May 17, 2010
- Abate by
- Jun 19, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $1,000 · Current $1,000
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1000.00
- — Z (S) $1000.00
1910.179 J02
- Issued
- May 17, 2010
- Abate by
- Jun 19, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $1,250 · Current $1,250
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1250.00
- — Z (S) $1250.00
1910.179 J03
- Issued
- May 17, 2010
- Abate by
- Jun 19, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $1,250 · Current $1,250
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1250.00
- — Z (S) $1250.00
1910.184 E03 I
- Issued
- May 17, 2010
- Abate by
- Jun 4, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $1,250 · Current $625 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $625.00
- — Z (S) $1250.00
1910.184 E03 III
- Issued
- May 17, 2010
- Abate by
- Jun 4, 2010
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.147 C01
- Issued
- May 17, 2010
- Abate by
- Oct 31, 2010
- Penalty
- Current $1,250
Recent events (3)
- — Q $1250.00
- — I (S) $1250.00
- — Z (S) $1250.00
1910.147 C04 I
- Issued
- May 17, 2010
- Abate by
- Oct 31, 2010
Recent events (3)
- — Q $1250.00
- — I (S)
- — Z (S) $1250.00
1910.147 C07 I
- Issued
- May 17, 2010
- Abate by
- Oct 31, 2010
Recent events (3)
- — Q $1250.00
- — I (S)
- — Z (S) $1250.00
1910.179 E02 I
- Issued
- May 17, 2010
- Abate by
- Jun 4, 2010
- Penalty
- Current $1,250
Recent events (3)
- — Q $1250.00
- — I (S) $1250.00
- — Z (S) $1250.00
1910.179 H01 I
- Issued
- May 17, 2010
- Abate by
- Jun 19, 2010
Recent events (3)
- — Q $1000.00
- — I (S)
- — Z (S) $1000.00
1910.179 J02
- Issued
- May 17, 2010
- Abate by
- Jun 19, 2010
- Penalty
- Current $1,250
Recent events (3)
- — Q $1250.00
- — I (S) $1250.00
- — Z (S) $1250.00
1910.179 J03
- Issued
- May 17, 2010
- Abate by
- Jun 19, 2010
Recent events (3)
- — Q $1250.00
- — I (S)
- — Z (S) $1250.00
More inspections at Galland Henning Nopak, INC.
View Galland Henning Nopak, INC.'s full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332313)
More inspections in WI
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 313525768.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.