Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,189,992Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-18 Last loaded 2026-07-22

OSHA Inspection: ART SIDING DESIGN INC.

Unprogrammed Other inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Other safety inspection of ART SIDING DESIGN INC. in 389 LAKE HAMILTON DRIVE, HOT SPRINGS, AR 71913 (NAICS 238170). OSHA activity number 313725491.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch ART Siding Design INC. — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for ART Siding Design INC. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
389 LAKE HAMILTON DRIVE
City
HOT SPRINGS
State
AR
ZIP
71913
Mailing
4346 FISHER STREET, KANSAS CITY, KS 66103
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Other (I)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
N
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238170
SIC code (legacy)
1761
Employees
3
Ownership type
A
Industry flags
Construction safety.

4 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 2 instances 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 20, 2009
Abate by
Dec 18, 2009
Penalty
Initial $1,500 · Current $1,500
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not furnish
employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized
hazards that were
causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in
that employees were
exposed to:
On or about November 05, 2009, and times thereto, an employee was exposed
to the
hazard of falling from a height of approximately 45'.  The employee was
using an
extension ladder from inside the personnel platform in order to reach the
dormer he was
applying vinyl siding to.  The personnel platform had already been raised
approximately
40' to the eave of the building.  The use of the extension ladder on the
platform placed
the employee outside of the protection of the guardrail system built into
the personnel
platform.  The employees' personnel fall arrest system was not employed in
a manner
that would prevent the employee from free falling the allowable six feet
prior to
deceleration.
Two feasible means of abatement would be:
1. A traditional scaffolding system could be erected which would allow
safe access to the
dormer.
2. A lift vehicle with the height capacity to reach the dormer would allow
the employee
to stay within the safety of the personnel platform.

1910.178 L01 II

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 20, 2009
Abate by
Dec 18, 2009
Penalty
Initial $1,500 · Current $1,500

1926.602 C01 VIIIA

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Nov 20, 2009
Abate by
Dec 18, 2009

1926.451 G01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Nov 20, 2009
Abate by
Dec 18, 2009
Penalty
Initial $1,500 · Current $1,500

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 313725491.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.