Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,191,473Inspections Most recent open 2026-07-28 Last loaded 2026-07-31

OSHA Inspection: IRON WORKS PRODUCTIONS III, LLC

Unprogrammed Related inspection · Health discipline

On , OSHA opened an unprogrammed Related health inspection of IRON WORKS PRODUCTIONS III, LLC in 1223 N 23RD STREET, WILMINGTON, NC 28405 (NAICS 512110). OSHA activity number 313830788.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch Iron Works Productions III, LLC — free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for Iron Works Productions III, LLC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
1223 N 23RD STREET
City
WILMINGTON
State
NC
ZIP
28405
Inspection type
Unprogrammed Related (G)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Health
Advance notice
No
Union status
N
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
512110
SIC code (legacy)
7812
Employees
193
Ownership type
A
Industry flags
Manufacturing health.

15 citations on file for this inspection.

95012901

Serious 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Aug 15, 2012
Abate by
Aug 20, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $1,680 Reduced
North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety and
Health Act of North Carolina:  The
employer did not furnish each of his employees conditions of employment
and a place of employment free from
recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious
physical harm to employees in that
employees were exposed to explosion hazards:
a)Mill Shop - where employees were using equipment such as, planers and
radial saws which had
flexible hoses attached to the exhaust system which were not bonded to the
equipment and metal
dusts.
ABATEMENT NOTE:
a)One acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to bond all
flexible hoses to the
equipment and metal dusts, they are attached too.
Reference a)Hazards are recognized and addressed in NFPA 664 paragraph
7.9.2;  "Where equipment is
subject to the accumulation of static charge, the accumulation of static
electric charge shall be
controlled by one of the following:  (1)  Permanent grounding and bonding
of production
equipment.  (2)  Grounded metal combs to provide discharge paths.  (3)
Other means shown to
be effective and acceptable to the authority having
jurisdiction."   0   0   y   0                                                 4
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1680.00
  • — Z (S) $2400.00

95012901

Serious 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Aug 15, 2012
Abate by
Oct 2, 2012
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $1,680 Reduced
North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety and
Health Act of North Carolina:  The
employer did not furnish each of his employees conditions of employment
and a place of employment free from
recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious
physical harm to employees in that
employees were exposed to explosion hazard:
a)Mill Shop - where the employer did not have a housekeeping program to
prevent fire and dust
hazards within the facility.
ABATEMENT NOTE:
a)One acceptable abatement method is to correct this hazard is to develop
and implement a
housekeeping program to control and prevent fire and dust hazards at the
facility, such as
documented housekeeping and inspection programs, regular cleaning
frequencies established for
walls, floors, and horizontal surfaces, such as equipment, ducts, pipes,
hoods, ledges, beams,
and above suspended ceilings and other concealed surfaces, to minimize
dust accumulations
within operating areas of the facility.
Reference a)Hazards are recognized and addressed in NFPA 664 paragraph
11.1.3;  "Documented
housekeeping and inspection programs shall be developed and maintained."
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $1680.00
  • — Z (S) $2400.00

95012901

Serious 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Aug 15, 2012
Abate by
Apr 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $1,680 Reduced
North Carolina General Statute 95-129(1) of the Occupational Safety and
Health Act of North
Carolina:  The employer did not furnish each of his employees conditions
of employment and
a place of employment free from recognized hazards that were causing or
likely to cause
death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed
to explosion
hazard:
a)Mill Shop - where the employer did not develop and implement an
inspection,
testing and maintenance program to prevent fire and dust explosions within
the
facility.
ABATEMENT NOTE:
a)One acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to develop and
implement a program to prevent fire and dust explosions within the
facility to
include; 1)  fire and explosion protection and prevention equipment in
accordance with the applicable NFPA standards, 2) Dust control equipment,
3)
Documented housekeeping and inspection programs, regular cleaning
frequencies established for walls, floors, and horizontal surfaces, such as
equipment, ducts, pipes, hoods, ledges, beams, and above suspended ceilings
and other concealed surfaces, to minimize dust accumulations within
operating
areas of the facility, 4)  Potential ignition sources,  5) Electrical,
process, and
mechanical equipment, including process interlocks, 6) Process changes, 7)
Lubrication of bearings.
Reference a):Hazards are recognized and addressed in NFPA 654 paragraph
12.1.1;  "An
inspection, testing, and maintenance program shall be developed and
implemented to ensure that the fire and explosion protection systems and
related process controls and equipment perform as designed."
Recent events (3)
  • — P (S) $1680.00
  • — I (S) $1680.00
  • — Z (S) $2400.00

1910.213 H01

Serious 2 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Aug 15, 2012
Abate by
Aug 20, 2012
Penalty
Initial $5,600 · Current $3,920 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S) $3920.00
  • — Z (S) $5600.00

1910.213 H04

Serious 2 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Aug 15, 2012
Abate by
Aug 20, 2012
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S)
  • — Z (S)

1910.307 C

Serious 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Aug 15, 2012
Abate by
Apr 30, 2013
Penalty
Initial $4,000 · Current $2,800 Reduced
Recent events (3)
  • — P (S) $2800.00
  • — I (S) $2800.00
  • — Z (S) $4000.00

1910.303 B02

Serious 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Aug 15, 2012
Abate by
Aug 20, 2012
Recent events (2)
  • — I (S)
  • — Z (S)

1910.37 B02

Other-than-serious 3 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Aug 15, 2012
Abate by
Aug 15, 2012
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O)
  • — Z (O)

1910.106 D06 IV

Other-than-serious 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Aug 15, 2012
Abate by
Aug 20, 2012
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O)
  • — Z (O)

1910.145 F03

Other-than-serious 3 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Aug 15, 2012
Abate by
Aug 20, 2012
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O)
  • — Z (O)

1910.242 A

Other-than-serious 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Aug 15, 2012
Abate by
Aug 20, 2012
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O)
  • — Z (O)

1910.303 G01 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Aug 15, 2012
Abate by
Aug 20, 2012
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O)
  • — Z (O)

1910.305 G01 IVB

Other-than-serious 1 instance 6 exposed
Issued
Aug 15, 2012
Abate by
Aug 20, 2012
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O)
  • — Z (O)

1910.305 G02 III

Other-than-serious 3 instances 6 exposed
Issued
Aug 15, 2012
Abate by
Aug 20, 2012
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O)
  • — Z (O)

1910.334 A02 II

Other-than-serious 1 instance
Issued
Aug 15, 2012
Abate by
Aug 20, 2012
Recent events (2)
  • — I (O)
  • — Z (O)

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 313830788.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.