Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,194,531Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-11 Last loaded 2026-08-14

OSHA Inspection: CMA INC DBA KFC

Complaint inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of CMA INC DBA KFC in 1010 E. RIO GRANDE ST, VICTORIA, TX 77901 (NAICS 722110). OSHA activity number 313861734.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch CMA INC DBA KFC for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for CMA INC DBA KFC is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Establishment
CMA INC DBA KFC
Site address
1010 E. RIO GRANDE ST
City
VICTORIA
State
TX
ZIP
77901
Mailing
PO BOX 631330, NACOGDOCHES, TX 75963
Inspection type
Complaint (B)
Scope
Complete (A)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
N
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
722110
SIC code (legacy)
5812
Employees
21
Ownership type
A

9 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 01 4 instances 20 exposed
Issued
Mar 31, 2010
Abate by
May 17, 2010
Penalty
Initial $450 · Current $270 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not
furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards that
were causing, or likely to cause, death or serious physical harm to
employees in that employees
were exposed to struck-by hazards:
On or about December 3, 2009, and at other times prior thereto, at this
site,
employees working at this retail restaurant were exposed to struck-by
hazards by
the following:
a.The Reach-In Cooler had a defective door hinge which could shift and fall
several inches suddenly when accessed and impact an employee's foot.
Among others, one feasible means of abatement is to operate a substitute
cooler until the original has a door in safe, working order.
b.The Upright-Warmer was leaned up against an adjacent piece of
equipment to prevent it tipping onto an employee from a defective wheel
base.  Among others, one feasible means of abatement is to operate a
substitute warmer until the base can be repaired as plumb so the cabinet
does not lean or tip.
c.In the surrounding parking lot, light poles had severely corroded
foundation hardware, posing a struck-by hazard to employees parking
there and cleaning the lot.  Poles have toppled in the past.  Among others,
one feasible means of abatement is structural assessment and replacement
of all weakened foundation mounting hardware.
d.The restaurant roof structure, sagging from water drain damage under the
overhead air conditioning unit, requires assessment for structure
stability.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $270.00
  • · Z (S) $450.00

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 02 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Mar 31, 2010
Abate by
Apr 12, 2010
Penalty
Initial $600 · Current $360 Reduced
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970:  The
employer did not
furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards that
were causing, or likely to cause, death or serious physical harm to
employees in that employees
were exposed to burn hazards from manually handling hot oil:
On or about December 3, 2009, and at other times prior thereto, at this
site,
employees were exposed to scalding hazards to the hands, feet, and other
parts
of the body.  The employer continued operation of the fryers while the hot
oil
drain pump was broken.  A receiving container with missing or broken wheels
being pulled across an uneven tile floor has been the interim practice.
Among
other methods, one acceptable means to correct this hazard it to provide
and
require the use of a closed pump and filtering system.
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $360.00
  • · Z (S) $600.00

1910.22 A02

Serious Gravity 01 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Mar 31, 2010
Abate by
Apr 12, 2010
Penalty
Initial $450 · Current $270 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $270.00
  • · Z (S) $450.00

1910.22 A03

Serious Gravity 01 3 instances 20 exposed
Issued
Mar 31, 2010
Abate by
Apr 8, 2010
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S)
  • · Z (S)

1910.22 B01

Serious Gravity 01 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Mar 31, 2010
Abate by
Apr 26, 2010
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S)
  • · Z (S)

1910.138 A

Serious Gravity 01 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Mar 31, 2010
Abate by
Apr 26, 2010
Penalty
Initial $450 · Current $270 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $270.00
  • · Z (S) $450.00

1910.303 G02 I

Serious Gravity 01 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Mar 31, 2010
Abate by
Apr 26, 2010
Penalty
Initial $450 · Current $270 Reduced
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S) $270.00
  • · Z (S) $450.00

1910.305 J01 I

Serious Gravity 01 2 instances 20 exposed
Issued
Mar 31, 2010
Abate by
Apr 19, 2010
Recent events (2)
  • · I (S)
  • · Z (S)

1910.134 D01 III

Other-than-serious Gravity 01 1 instance 20 exposed
Issued
Mar 31, 2010
Abate by
May 10, 2010
Recent events (2)
  • · I (O)
  • · Z (O)

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 313861734.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.