LAS VEGAS, NV —
OSHA Inspection: SILVER STATE TOWING
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of SILVER STATE TOWING in 2400 SOUTH HIGHLAND DRIVE, LAS VEGAS, NV 89102 (NAICS 488410). OSHA activity number 313967770.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- SILVER STATE TOWING
- Site address
- 2400 SOUTH HIGHLAND DRIVE
- City
- LAS VEGAS
- State
- NV
- ZIP
- 89102
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 488410
- SIC code (legacy)
- 7549
- Employees
- 14
- Ownership type
- A
- Industry flags
- Manufacturing safety.
Citations
21 citations on file for this inspection.
618037501
- Issued
- Dec 9, 2009
- Abate by
- Dec 26, 2009
- Penalty
- Initial $600 · Current $600
General-duty citation text
Nevada Revised Statute 618.375(1): Duties of employers. The employer failed to furnish employment and a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to his employees: The employer did not ensure that a place of employment was free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to his employees as follows: a.Located in the tow truck repair facility at Silver State Towing, an employee was exposed to improper installation of a compressed air system used to operate pneumatic tools. Schedule 40, PVC was installed to transport compressed air at 120 psi and exposed employee to serious injury in the event the PVC shattered. Reference: OSHA.gov, Letter of Interpretation dated February 28, 1991. "Since PVC material does not possess shatter resistant property, and since it is very clear from the industry's recognized practice that PVC pipes are prohibited for above ground transportation of compressed air and gases (unless the pipelines are encased in shatter resistant material), any such use by the employers, where employees may be exposed to hazards, will be in violation of Section 5(a)(1) of the OSH Act (or NRS 618.375). One feasible means of abatement would be to install a shatter resistant material designed specifically for the transporting of compressed air.ressed
618037501
- Issued
- Dec 9, 2009
- Abate by
- Jan 27, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $600 · Current $600
General-duty citation text
Nevada Revised Statute 618.375(1): Duties of employers. The employer failed to furnish employment and a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to his employees: The employer did not ensure that their place of employment was free from recognized hazards that were likely to cause death or serious physical harm to his employees as follows: a.Located at the tow truck repair facility at Silver State Towing, two automotive lifts installed by the owner, were utilized by an employee that was not trained to operate the lifts as required by American National Standard for Automotive Lifts - 2008 for operation, inspection and maintenance. Reference: ANSI for Automotive Lifts - 2008, 4.2.1; The owner or employer shall ensure that operators of automotive lifts are instructed in the safe use and operation of the lift using manufacturer-provided instructions and warning labels and the Automotive Lift Institute publications, "Quick Reference Guide, Vehicle Lifting Points for Frame Engaging Lifts", "Lifting it Right", "Safety Tips" and this ALOIM Standard. A reasonable means of abatement would be to train all employees on auto lifts before operating as required by ANSI for Automotive Lifts - 2008.
Recent events (2)
- — P (S) $600.00
- — Z (S) $600.00
618037501
- Issued
- Dec 9, 2009
- Abate by
- Jan 20, 2010
- Penalty
- Initial $600 · Current $600
General-duty citation text
Nevada Revised Statute 618.375(1): Duties of employers. The employer failed to furnish employment and a place of employment which was free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to his employees: The employer did not ensure that their place of employment was free from recognized hazards that were likely to cause death or serious physical harm to his employees as follows: a.Located at the tow truck repair facility at Silver State Towing, two automotive lifts being utilized by an employee, without regard to the frequency of inspection specified by the lift manufacturer, whether it be weekly, monthly, semi-annually, annually or on some other basis, were not inspected by a qualified lift inspector as a minimum annual requirement per the American National Standard for Automotive Lifts - 2008 for operation, inspection and maintenance. Reference: ANSI for Automotive Lifts - 2008, 5.5 A reasonable means of abatement would be to schedule a qualified lift inspector as described in American National Standard for Automotive Lifts - 2008, to inspect both lifts as a minimum of annually.e
Recent events (2)
- — P (S) $600.00
- — Z (S) $600.00
1910.212 B
- Issued
- Dec 9, 2009
- Abate by
- Dec 14, 2009
- Penalty
- Initial $225 · Current $225
1910.215 A04
- Issued
- Dec 9, 2009
- Abate by
- Dec 14, 2009
- Penalty
- Initial $225 · Current $225
1910.215 B09
- Issued
- Dec 9, 2009
- Abate by
- Dec 14, 2009
- Penalty
- Initial $300 · Current $300
1910.219 F03
- Issued
- Dec 9, 2009
- Abate by
- Dec 26, 2009
- Penalty
- Initial $600 · Current $600
1910.243 B02
- Issued
- Dec 9, 2009
- Abate by
- Dec 26, 2009
- Penalty
- Initial $225 · Current $225
1910.303 G02 I
- Issued
- Dec 9, 2009
- Abate by
- Dec 14, 2009
- Penalty
- Initial $375 · Current $375
1910.305 B01 II
- Issued
- Dec 9, 2009
- Abate by
- Dec 26, 2009
- Penalty
- Initial $750 · Current $750
1910.305 B02 I
- Issued
- Dec 9, 2009
- Abate by
- Dec 19, 2009
- Penalty
- Initial $1,500 · Current $1,500
1910.305 G02 II
- Issued
- Dec 9, 2009
- Abate by
- Dec 13, 2009
- Penalty
- Initial $750 · Current $750
1910.334 A02 I
- Issued
- Dec 9, 2009
- Abate by
- Dec 14, 2009
- Penalty
- Initial $375 · Current $375
618037601
- Issued
- Nov 30, 2009
- Abate by
- Dec 3, 2009
618038301
- Issued
- Nov 30, 2009
- Abate by
- Dec 31, 2009
1904.1 A02
- Issued
- Nov 30, 2009
- Abate by
- Dec 31, 2009
1910.23 D01 III
- Issued
- Nov 30, 2009
- Abate by
- Dec 11, 2009
1910.132 D01
- Issued
- Nov 30, 2009
- Abate by
- Dec 31, 2009
1910.303 B02
- Issued
- Nov 30, 2009
- Abate by
- Dec 11, 2009
1910.305 G01 IVC
- Issued
- Nov 30, 2009
- Abate by
- Dec 11, 2009
1910.1200 E01
- Issued
- Nov 30, 2009
- Abate by
- Dec 31, 2009
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 488410)
More inspections in NV
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 313967770.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.