Safety Incidents OSHA Severe Injury Reports · 2015–2025
5,196,991Inspections Most recent open 2026-08-24 Last loaded 2026-08-27

OSHA Inspection: A AND J CARPENTERS CORP.

Planned inspection · Safety discipline

On , OSHA opened a planned safety inspection of A AND J CARPENTERS CORP. in 35 ORION ROAD, BERKELEY HEIGHTS, NJ 07922 (NAICS 238130). OSHA activity number 313983819.

What this inspection record means

OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.

Watch A and J Carpenters Corp. for free Get an email when a new federal OSHA severe-injury report for A and J Carpenters Corp. is published. One employer, no account, unsubscribe in one click.
Site address
35 ORION ROAD
City
BERKELEY HEIGHTS
State
NJ
ZIP
07922
Mailing
124 DAVENPORT AVENUE, NEWARK, NJ 07107
Inspection type
Planned (H)
Scope
Partial (B)
Discipline
Safety
Advance notice
No
Union status
Non-union (N)
Opened
Closing conference
Case closed
Last modified
Data loaded
NAICS code
238130
SIC code (legacy)
1751
Employees
4
Ownership type
Private (A)

4 citations on file for this inspection.

5(a)(1)

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 2 exposed
Issued
Dec 8, 2010
Abate by
Dec 13, 2010
Penalty
Initial $4,200 · Current $4,200
Section 5(a)(1) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The
employer did not
furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from
recognized hazards
that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to
employees in that
employees were exposed to fall hazards:
a) On or about 11/19/10 at 35 Orion Road, Berkeley Heights, NJ 07922 two
employees were working on and from a jobmade platform resting (unsecured)
on the
forks of a Traverse Lift 8042, elevated in excess of 16 feet to the ground
below with
no fall protection systems in place. In addition the Lull was left running
and
unoccupied as the operator was also working on and from the jobmade
platform.
ONE FEASIBLE AND ACCEPTABLE METHOD TO CORRECT THIS HAZARD,
AMONG OTHER MEANS, WOULD BE:
a) FOR THE COMPANY TO ENFORCE THEIR EXISTING SAFETY AND
HEALTH PROGRAM.
b) FOR THE COMPANY TO PROVIDE A PERSONNEL PLATFORM
APPROVED BY THE MANUFACTURER.
c) FOR THE COMPANY TO PROVIDE A FALL PROTECTION SYSTEM(S)
TO THE EMPLOYEE(s) WHILE WORKING ON AND FROM AN APPROVED
PLATFORM.

1926.20 B02

Serious Gravity 05 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 8, 2010
Abate by
Dec 13, 2010
Penalty
Initial $2,400 · Current $2,400

1926.102 A01

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 1 exposed
Issued
Dec 8, 2010
Abate by
Dec 13, 2010
Penalty
Initial $4,200 · Current $4,200

1926.300 B02

Serious Gravity 10 1 instance 4 exposed
Issued
Dec 8, 2010
Abate by
Dec 13, 2010
Penalty
Initial $4,200 · Current $4,200

This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 313983819.

Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.