VALLEY, NE —
OSHA Inspection: BUSHNELL ILLINOIS TANK CO. D/B/A SCHULD/BUSHNELL
Complaint inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened a complaint safety inspection of BUSHNELL ILLINOIS TANK CO. D/B/A SCHULD/BUSHNELL in 8002 N. 288 STREET, VALLEY, NE 68064 (NAICS 332999). OSHA activity number 314058884.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons — routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- BUSHNELL ILLINOIS TANK CO. D/B/A SCHULD/BUSHNELL
- Site address
- 8002 N. 288 STREET
- City
- VALLEY
- State
- NE
- ZIP
- 68064
- Mailing
- 650 W DAVIS STREET, BUSHNELL, IL 61422
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Complaint (B)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- N
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 332999
- SIC code (legacy)
- 3999
- Employees
- 15
- Ownership type
- A
Citations
14 citations on file for this inspection.
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jul 7, 2011
- Abate by
- Nov 9, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $875 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)1 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to struck-by and/or crushing hazards from falling loads: a) In the Legging Area, employees were exposed to struck-by and/or crushing hazards from falling loads, such as fractured bones when loads (grain bins) fall unexpectedly from an overloaded hoist. The employer did not ensure that employees used hoists to lift only loads within the hoist's lifting capacity. A 3-ton underhung hoist was being used to lift and maneuver grain bins that weighed approximately 10,000 - 16,000 lbs, and the bins have unexpectedly fallen. b) In the Shelling Area, employees were exposed to the same hazard as a 5-ton hoist was being used to lift and maneuver grain bins that weighed approximately 10,000 - 16,000 lbs while employees work and walk under the suspended grain bin. AMONG OTHER METHODS, FEASIBLE AND ACCEPTABLE ABATEMENT METHODS TO CORRECT THIS HAZARD ARE: 1.)Train employees to identify the hoist capacity and ensure hoists are not used to lift materials exceeding the identified capacity and also to remain clear of suspended loads. 2.)Develop work rules and disciplinary procedures prohibiting using hoists to lift loads that would exceed the hoist capacity and also prohibiting employees working and walking under or near suspended loads. 3.)Utilize and implement the guidelines as outlined in the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Overhead Hoists (Underhung). ASME B30.16-2007. This includes that the operator shall be familiar with all operating controls of the hoist, and be instructed in the operation(s) to be performed. This includes, but is not limited to: (a)Instructions shall include, as applicable, the warnings on the hoist, the hoist use practices listed in this Section, and the usage instructions portions of the hoists' manufacturer's manual; (b)The operator shall not pick up a load in excess of the rated load appearing on the hoist or load block, except during properly authorized tests or properly authorized planned engineered lifts in accordance with para. 16-3.2.2; (c)The operator shall not lift or lower a load with the hoist until the operator and all other personnel are clear of the load; (d)Frequent inspections shall be performed at intervals defined in para. 16-2.1.1(b)(1) and shall include observations during operation. Abatement certification and abatement documentation is required for this violation. Theabatement certification sheet is enclosed with the citations.ion
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $875.00
- — Z (S) $3500.00
5(a)(1)
- Issued
- Jul 7, 2011
- Abate by
- Nov 9, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $4,200 · Current $1,050 Reduced
General-duty citation text
Section 5(a)1 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970: The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees in that employees were exposed to: In the Legging Area, employees were exposed to fall hazards, resulting in injures such as fractured bones when fiberglass ladders that are being used fail. The employer did not ensure that employees did not use defective ladders. Employees were using a Keller 8 foot ladder that was defective. The ladder had a support brace on the back that was damaged. AMONG OTHER METHODS, FEASIBLE AND ACCEPTABLE ABATEMENT METHODS TO CORRECT THIS HAZARD ARE: 1.) Train employees to recognize conditions to prohibit using fiberglass ladders which are defective. 2.) Develop work rules and disciplinary procedures prohibiting using fiberglass ladders which are defective. 3.) Utilize and implement the guidelines as outlined in the American National Standard for Ladders - Portable Reinforced Plastic - Safety Requirements ANSI A14.5 - 2000. This includes that the user shall be familiar with all usage of fiberglass ladders. This includes, but is not limited to: (a) Instructions shall include, as applicable, the warnings on the ladder, the ladder use practices listed in this Section, and the usage instructions portions of the ladder manufacturer's manual; (b) The ladder shall be inspected periodically, preferably before use; (c) Broken or bent ladders shall be taken out of service until they are repaired by a competent mechanic or destroyed in such a manner as to render them useless. Abatement certification and abatement documentation is required for this violation. The abatement certification sheet is enclosed with the citations.
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1050.00
- — Z (S) $4200.00
1910.23 C01
- Issued
- Jul 7, 2011
- Abate by
- Nov 9, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $4,200 · Current $1,050 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1050.00
- — Z (S) $4200.00
1910.178 L01 I
- Issued
- Jul 7, 2011
- Abate by
- Nov 9, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $4,900 · Current $1,225 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1225.00
- — Z (S) $4900.00
1910.178 L01 II
- Issued
- Jul 7, 2011
- Abate by
- Aug 9, 2011
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.178 O02
- Issued
- Jul 7, 2011
- Abate by
- Nov 9, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $875 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $875.00
- — Z (S) $3500.00
1910.184 C01
- Issued
- Jul 7, 2011
- Abate by
- Nov 9, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $4,200 · Current $1,050 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $1050.00
- — Z (S) $4200.00
1910.184 D
- Issued
- Jul 7, 2011
- Abate by
- Nov 9, 2011
Recent events (2)
- — I (S)
- — Z (S)
1910.219 D01
- Issued
- Jul 7, 2011
- Abate by
- Jul 12, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $875 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $875.00
- — Z (S) $3500.00
1910.219 E03
- Issued
- Jul 7, 2011
- Abate by
- Jul 12, 2011
1910.303 B01
- Issued
- Jul 7, 2011
- Abate by
- Jul 12, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $875 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $875.00
- — Z (S) $3500.00
1910.304 B03 IIC3
- Issued
- Jul 7, 2011
- Abate by
- Nov 9, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $875 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $875.00
- — Z (S) $3500.00
1910.305 B02 I
- Issued
- Jul 7, 2011
- Abate by
- Jul 12, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $3,500 · Current $875 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (S) $875.00
- — Z (S) $3500.00
1910.305 G02 III
- Issued
- Jul 7, 2011
- Abate by
- Nov 9, 2011
- Penalty
- Initial $7,000 · Current $1,750 Reduced
Recent events (2)
- — I (R) $1750.00
- — Z (R) $7000.00
More inspections at Bushnell Illinois Tank CO. D/B/A Schuld/Bushnell
View Bushnell Illinois Tank CO. D/B/A Schuld/Bushnell's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 332999)
More inspections in NE
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). The original IMIS detail view is available at OSHA's Establishment Search for activity number 314058884.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.