ROCKVILLE, MD ·
OSHA Inspection: WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
Accident-driven inspection · Safety discipline
At a glance
On , OSHA opened an accident-driven safety inspection of WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY in METRO TRAIN TRACKS, REDLINE, AT CHAIN MARKER, ROCKVILLE, MD 20850 (NAICS 485112). OSHA activity number 314068289.
OSHA opens inspections for many reasons: routine scheduling under a national or local emphasis program, an employee complaint or referral, or a follow-up after a reported injury. Opening or conducting an inspection is not itself an allegation or a finding that this employer broke any rule; any findings appear as the citations listed below, and citations can be contested, reduced, or withdrawn.
Where did this inspection happen?
- Establishment
- WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY
- Site address
- METRO TRAIN TRACKS, REDLINE, AT CHAIN MARKER
- City
- ROCKVILLE
- State
- MD
- ZIP
- 20850
- Mailing
- 600 FIFTH STREET, NW, ROOM 2A-01, WASHINGTON, DC 20001
What kind of inspection was it?
- Inspection type
- Accident-driven (A)
- Scope
- Partial (B)
- Discipline
- Safety
- Advance notice
- No
- Union status
- Union (Y)
When did the case open and close?
- Opened
- Closing conference
- Case closed
- Last modified
- Data loaded
Establishment context
- NAICS code
- 485112
- SIC code (legacy)
- 4111
- Employees
- 6
- Ownership type
- Local government (B)
Citations
4 citations on file for this inspection.
50104 A
- Issued
- Jul 22, 2010
- Abate by
- Jul 29, 2010
General-duty citation text
Labor and Employment Article, Section 5-104(a): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees: (a)Date of Violation:01/26/10 Location:Redline Track A2, at Chain Marker A2 852+28, One Mile North of the Rockville Metro Station Condition:The employer did not provide or implement an effective means of communication between the Operations Control Center (OCC), a maintenance crew, and an Automatic Train Control (ATC) crew, working on the track and exposed to being struck by a hi-rail vehicle. A clear and effective means of communication had not been established between the OCC, the ATC crew, and the maintenance crew. The two work crews occupied the same section of tracks between the Rockville and Shady Grove stations and were not fully cognizant of each other's work locations. The OCC did not ensure that all work crews, prior to accessing the tracks, had radio communication and fully understood and acknowledged radio transmissions. The ATC crew, working on the tracks, did not have effective radio contact with the OCC or the maintenance crew. The operational status of the ATC crew was not known to OCC; they did not know if a constant lookout was maintained while the crew was on the tracks, the physical location of crew members at all times whether on or off the track, nor work progress or tasks being performed. The helper with the ATC crew did not have a radio, but performed other duties and was not continuously with the ATC crew. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to ensure that established communication procedures are used. Abatement documentation (photographs, receipts, copies of programs, training certification, etc.) is required for this item.
Recent events (2)
- · F (S)
- · Z (S)
50104 A
- Issued
- Jul 22, 2010
- Abate by
- Jul 29, 2010
General-duty citation text
Labor and Employment Article, Section 5-104(a): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees: (a)Date of Violation:01/26/10 Location:Redline, Track A2, at Chain Marker A2 852+28, One Mile North of Rockville Metro Station Condition:The employer did not ensure that a constant lookout, in the direction of travel, was maintained by the operator of a hi-rail vehicle, that was equipped with a back-up alarm, and where the view to the rear was obstructed. A maintenance crew was traveling in a hi-rail vehicle on the same section of track where the ATC crew was working. The hi-rail vehicle was being operated in reverse so the covers on the third rail could be inspected as they traveled toward the Rockville Metro Station to set up their work zone. The operator of the vehicle did not maintain a constant lookout in the direction the vehicle was traveling. The vehicle had an obstructed view to the rear and was not equipped with a back up alarm. The occupants of the vehicle did not know what was on the tracks, in the direction of travel, and were unaware that the ATC crew was working on the section of tracks they were traveling. Among other methods, one feasible means of abatement to correct this hazard is to ensure that all rail vehicles maintain a constant lookout in the direction the vehicle is traveling as established in the Metrorail Safety and Procedures Handbook. Abatement documentation (photographs, receipts, copies of programs, training certification, etc.) is required for this item.
Recent events (2)
- · F (S)
- · Z (S)
50104 A
- Issued
- Jul 22, 2010
- Abate by
- Jul 29, 2010
General-duty citation text
Labor and Employment Article, Section 5-104(a): The employer did not furnish employment and a place of employment which were free from recognized hazards that were causing or likely to cause death or serious physical harm to employees: (a)Date of Violation:01/26/10 Location:Redline, Track A2, at Chain Marker A2 852+28, One Mile North of Rockville Metro Station Condition:The employer did not ensure that employees of an Automatic Train Control (ATC) crew performing work on a railroad track, maintained a constant lookout in both directions of travel to warn of approaching trains on all rail maintenance vehicles. Among other methods, one feasible and acceptable abatement method to correct this hazard is to ensure that work crews working within the rail right-of-way maintain a constant lookout in both directions as established in the Metrorail Safety Rules and Procedures Handbook. Abatement documentation (photographs, receipts, copies of programs, training certification, etc.) is required for this item.
Recent events (2)
- · F (S)
- · Z (S)
1904.40 A
- Issued
- Jul 22, 2010
- Abate by
- Jul 25, 2010
Recent events (2)
- · F (O)
- · Z (O)
More inspections at Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
View Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority's full OSHA safety record →
More inspections in this industry (NAICS 485112)
More inspections in MD
Source
This record is reproduced from the U.S. Department of Labor Open Data API (OSHA inspection dataset). OSHA publishes its own view of this case as inspection number 314068289.
Look up any company's OSHA accident reports by company, or browse severe injury reports by year, state, and company.